Name that Equation.
1
Name:
Anonymous
2007-10-15 23:12
z=(x-μ)/σ
This is an easy one. GO.
2
Name:
Anonymous
2007-10-16 0:49
that's Fred
3
Name:
RedCream
2007-10-16 4:21
You're correct. That is indeed Fred ... Mr. Fred T. Equation.
4
Name:
Anonymous
2007-10-16 11:15
thats the equation that changes a probability distribution that seems to be "normal" isnt a normal distribution that can be used for sums and put in a graph and other such things,
Y/N?
5
Name:
Anonymous
2007-10-16 18:37
ax^2 + bx + c = 0
guyse whats that one?
6
Name:
Anonymous
2007-10-16 19:46
>>5
I believe that's called the Pithagoriss Theory.
7
Name:
Anonymous
2007-10-16 21:11
δg/δy + d/dx(δg/δy') = 0
where g=(g(y,y',x) and y'=dy/dx
8
Name:
RedCream
2007-10-16 23:19
>>6
No, that's the formula used to measure how long it takes for piss to land on balls, hence, the Pissonballs Theory. Shit, any of you could have googled that one!
9
Name:
4tran
2007-10-16 23:54
>>7
Euler Lagrange equation. You're also missing a negative sign.
10
Name:
Anonymous
2007-10-17 0:41
1+1=1
11
Name:
Anonymous
2007-10-17 0:43
12
Name:
Anonymous
2007-10-17 0:45
≡
13
Name:
RedCream
2007-10-17 3:47
≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡
≡≡-----≡---≡≡----≡≡----≡≡≡≡≡---≡≡-≡≡≡-≡≡≡≡----≡≡≡---≡≡-≡≡≡≡-≡≡≡≡≡----≡≡
≡≡-≡≡≡-≡≡-≡≡-≡≡≡≡≡-≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡-≡≡≡-≡--≡≡-≡≡≡≡-≡≡≡-≡-≡≡≡-≡-≡≡≡≡-≡≡≡≡-≡≡≡≡≡≡
≡≡-----≡≡-≡≡≡---≡≡≡---≡≡≡≡≡-≡≡≡-≡-≡-≡-≡≡≡≡----≡≡-----≡-≡≡≡≡-≡≡≡≡≡---≡≡≡
≡≡-≡≡≡≡≡≡-≡≡≡≡≡≡-≡≡≡≡≡-≡≡≡≡-≡≡≡-≡-≡≡--≡≡≡≡-≡≡≡-≡-≡≡≡-≡-≡≡≡≡-≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡-≡≡
≡≡-≡≡≡≡≡---≡----≡≡----≡≡≡≡≡≡---≡≡-≡≡≡-≡≡≡≡----≡≡-≡≡≡-≡----≡----≡----≡≡≡
≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡≡
14
Name:
Anonymous
2007-10-17 4:29
I see what you did there.
15
Name:
Anonymous
2007-10-17 8:15
>>1
It's a side view of a guy thrusting his right fist forward while winking at me.
16
Name:
Anonymous
2007-10-17 15:43
>>10
A Boolean Algebra identity. :)
17
Name:
Anonymous
2007-10-17 17:20
x + y = x - y
18
Name:
Anonymous
2007-10-17 20:05
∫a->b f'(x)dx = f(b) - f(a)
19
Name:
Anonymous
2007-10-17 20:10
>>18
Fundamental Theorem of Calculus??
20
Name:
Anonymous
2007-10-17 22:03
21
Name:
Anonymous
2007-10-17 22:27
22
Name:
Anonymous
2007-10-17 22:38
(x∈⋂S)↔(∀C∈S,x∈∀)
23
Name:
Anonymous
2007-10-17 22:39
x∈∀lol
that should be x∈C
24
Name:
Anonymous
2007-10-18 7:40
25
Name:
Anonymous
2007-10-18 17:05
>>21
incorrect, (mod 2).
x - y = x + y
if x = y,
0 = x + y => 0 = 2x, in mod 2 that's 0 = 0
1 4
-3
5
if x != y
x - y = z
if z is even, both x and y are either odd or even, which means in mod2 = 0, their difference would be even as well, 0 = 0
If z is odd, either x or y is what the other is not (odd/even), so 1 = 1
26
Name:
Anonymous
2007-10-18 18:01
i(dfz/dy-dfy/dz)+j(dfz/dx-dfx/dz)+k(dfy/dx-dfx/dy)
with f=fx*i+fy*j+fz*k
27
Name:
Anonymous
2007-10-18 18:27
>>25
x + y = x - y
2y = 0
y = 0
28
Name:
Anonymous
2007-10-18 18:51
>>25
x - y = x + y
-y=y
Only works for 0...
29
Name:
Anonymous
2007-10-18 22:38
>>25
Humor for matematicians: Instead of appending '… in bed.' to fortune cookies, append '… (mod 2)' to formulas.
e.g.
e
iπ + 1 = 0 … (mod 2)
30
Name:
Anonymous
2009-07-24 15:40
>>13
RedCream, you faggot, go back to anusland.
31
Name:
Anonymous
2009-07-24 18:11
I(\mathfrak{c})/P_{\mathfrak{c}} \mathfrak{N}(\mathfrak{c}) \cong G
32
Name:
Anonymous
2009-07-24 18:15
>>31
oh ffs fuck this and this thread
33
Name:
Anonymous
2009-07-25 15:10
[math]
\nu _{o} = \frac{\nu _{max}[S] }{K _{M} + [S] }
[/math]
34
Name:
Anonymous
2009-07-25 15:11
[eqn] \nu _{o} = \frac{\nu _{max}[S] }{K _{M} + [S] }[/eqn]
35
Name:
Anonymous
2009-07-25 15:14
how do you type this shit
36
Name:
Anonymous
2009-07-25 22:58
like
>>33, but all on the same line.
[ math]\nu _{o} = \frac{\nu _{max}
[S] }{K _{M} +
[S] }[/ math]
gives
[math] \nu _{o} = \frac{\nu _{max}
[S] }{K _{M} +
[S] }
[/math]
37
Name:
Anonymous
2009-07-25 23:00
>>36
Huh, does it need to be a backslash on [\math]?
[math] \nu _{o} = \frac{\nu _{max}
[S] }{K _{M} +
[S] }[\math]
38
Name:
Anonymous
2009-07-25 23:00
wtf?
Forward slash: 1+1=69
39
Name:
Anonymous
2009-07-25 23:01
I dunno lol. ¯\(°_o)/¯
40
Name:
Anonymous
2009-07-26 17:32
silly troll, normal distributions are for kids.
41
Name:
Anonymous
2009-07-26 20:36
tsee equals open parenthesis ecks minus lower-case mu close-parenthesis divided by lower-case sigma
42
Name:
Anonymous
2009-07-28 4:43
43
Name:
Anonymous
2009-07-28 4:45
\nabla\times H = \frac{\part D}{\part t} + j
\nabla\times E = - \frac{\part B}{\part t}
\nabla\cdot D = \rho
\nabla\cdot B = 0
D = \varepsilon_0 \, E + P = \varepsilon\,E
B = \mu_0\,(H + M) = \mu\,H
Beautiful.
44
Name:
4tran
2009-07-28 7:23
>>43
D, P, H, M fields... bah. Maxwell's original equations made reference to these fields, but they're rarely used nowadays.
45
Name:
Anonymous
2009-07-28 14:49
>>44
>>rarely used nowadays
Yeah, no.
46
Name:
Anonymous
2009-08-03 6:35
[math] \nu _{o} = \frac{\nu _{max}[S] }{K _{M} + [S] }[/math]