Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

testing

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-09 16:51

testing

Name: Pasis 2007-10-09 17:03

Hi guys, I'm new. I'm somewhat limited on my mathematical terms, so please go easy on me(I referred annular circles(or whatever it is called) as donut circles before actually knowing what is it called).

Eh, I found this somewhere, tried it, but it got irritating after a while(2 weeks, that is). The equation is obvious, but I am missing something.

Given that a>0, b>0 and a+b=1, prove that

(a+(1/a))^2 + (b+(1/b)^2 is greater or equal than 25/2

From the conditions and equation given, one can pretty much see that the equation is correct. But I tried proving it through algebriac means(Calculation, also known as 'hammering' the problem)... and umm... well... x_x

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-09 17:30

Tried replacing b with 1-a yet?

Name: Pasis 2007-10-09 17:36

>>3

Yes. It's the first thing I did. 2 weeks. I can't miss that.

I even tried arranging them into a+b forms for each part area, in all but rapid failure.

Name: Pasis 2007-10-10 13:01

No ideas, anyone?

Or nobody is trying/people did not notice/people ignored this thread? ._.

Name: tasi 2007-10-10 13:53

Wait? can't you do like
f(x)=(a + 1/a)^2 + (a-1+1/(a - 1))^2

f'(x)=-2/a²(a+1/a)-2/(a-1)²(a-1(a-1+1/(a - 1))

(-2/a²)*(a+1/a)-(2/(a-1)²)*(a-1+1/(a-1))=0   ->  a=0.5

Yeah and if you look at the graph of the function (f(x)=(a + 1/a)^2 + (a-1+1/(a - 1))^2) you can see that 0.5 is a minimum, therefore no other value of a can make the y-value drop lower than 25/2. Problem solved :D Hope you understood me, english maths is not my favourite.

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-10 14:12

I've got a feeling you're not supposed to use calculus.

Name: Pasis 2007-10-10 15:07

>>6

Eh, maybe. Because I still have a little flaw in understanding the solution... I have an idea of what you're doing, but I'm a little fuzzy in the morningtime.

What is the form of the graph for the function? I just can't plainly imagine it. How does a quadic over quadic graph look like(Straight line? Lollerskates)? 0_o

Unless you are plotting points(middle of early morning, not doing it)... =_=ZzZ...

Try showing it in algebraic notations after you explain a bit further on your solution. Prove it by using both a and b in the inequality.

Name: tasi 2007-10-10 15:08

:( But it's the only way i know, except for just looking at it and just seeing that anything different from .5 makes it greater than 25/2 :P
You could draw it too, that's not calculus is it?^^

Name: tasi 2007-10-10 15:32

well it got 2 poles, one at 0 and one at 1 to +infinity , and between them is the minimum at exactly 0.5 , left and right of the poles the graph just looks like some missshaped parabola :D
hope you can post links on here (http://img115.imageshack.us/img115/9877/123cv2.gif)
This is what it looks like. And as neither b nor a can get lower or higher than 0 and 1. So i was just calculating the extreme values of the function. And as it has to be between 0 and 1 , i chose 0.5 of the three possibilities.

uhm, you could just replace all the a's with b's and it would still be the same :)

with f'(x) i meant the derivative.

The extreme value of the function is a minimum located at 0.5 / 12.5 , thus no lower value than 12.5 is possible.

Hope you understand what I'm trying to say, english isn't my first language and i never did maths in it before :D

Name: Pasis 2007-10-10 15:46

I tend to just imagine the graph than to write it in paper. I do the planning first in my mind before doing the work on paper. This is something I cannot do at 3 am now.

Even straight out 0.5 as values for both a and b could work, I guess.They will add up to a number greater than 12.5. In fact, I know that any decimal numbers that a and b will add into one will produce a greater number than 12.5. That, I am well aware.

What does one mean by "It's the only way you know"?

Have your tried it in algebriac calculation already?

I guess I already have a grip on your solution... but the aim of me looking about is to see if it can be solved by algebriac means. Just to see a clearer form in which one can explain to an even slightly mathematically inclined person so he/she could understand.

Name: tasi 2007-10-10 16:18

Well, everything i do is to calculate the derivative, to prove that 0.5/12.5 is the minimum of the function. That is all by using algebraic rules.
(a+(1/a))^2 + (b+(1/b)^2 >=12.5
a+b=1
b=a-1
Now replace the b with (a-1) -> (a + 1/a)^2 + (a-1+1/(a - 1))^2
This is the function i'm using: f(x)=(a + 1/a)^2 + (a-1+1/(a - 1))^2

Now i calculate the derivative:
f'(x)= -2/a²(a+1/a)-2/(a-1)²(a-1(a-1+1/(a - 1))

And then I calculate the extreme value:

-2/a²(a+1/a)-2/(a-1)²(a-1(a-1+1/(a - 1)) = 0

a=0.5

f(0.5)=12.5

The minimum of the function is 0.5/12.5 , so it's impossible that you get any y value lower than 12.5.

Name: Pasis 2007-10-11 1:00

*scratchscratch*

Umm... I do not know how to convey what I want to you...

Can you do it without using calculus, then? Just plain old moving about unknowns? Never mind if that can't be done. I just want a confirmation that one is screwed if one does that.

Your solution is already plausible. I am sure of it already. ._.

Name: tasi 2007-10-11 4:50

I don't think it's possible with just moving the unknowns, you'd get an equation with a^6...And i have no idea how to solve that one.
The only way i know is doing it by using calculus. And I think it's the only way to really prove it.

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-11 6:43

Fuck's sake.
Minimum of (a+1/a) is 2.5, when a = 1/2 (for a > 0).
a+b=1, so the minima of (a+1/a)+(b+1/b) coincide at a=b=1/2.
What more do you want?

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-11 8:14

>>15

Proof of the statement beginning "Minimum...", i.e. the actual crux of the problem.

Name: tasi 2007-10-11 13:13

But you can only calculate the minimum using calculus. :S

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-11 13:31

I don't get it, if not calculus than what do you want?

Name: 4tran 2007-10-15 5:03

>>11
All real numbers between 0 and 1 have a decimal expansion, and thus, are decimal numbers.  "Feeling" that something is right isn't the same as a rigorous proof.

Furthermore, calculus is a subset of algebra.

>>15
Phail.  The minimum is 2 at a = 1.

>>1
The arithmetic mean - root mean square inequality states that for any x,y >0,
[(x2 + y2)/2]1/2 >= [x+y]/2, with equality iff x = y.

Thus,
(a+1/a)2 + (b+1/b)2 >= 2[(a+1/a+b+1/b)/2]2 = (1/2)[1 + 1/a + 1/b]2 = (1/2)[1 + (b+a)/(ab)]2 = (1/2)[1 + 1/(ab)]2

ab = a(1-a) = a - a2 = 1/4 - (a - 1/2)2 <= 1/4

(1/2)[1 + 1/(ab)]2 >= (1/2)[1 + 1/(1/4)]2 = (1/2)[1 + 4]2 = (1/2)52 = 25/2

Name: 4tran 2007-10-15 5:15

>>19
Oops, I was referring to >>2, not >>1

For more information, see
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generalized_mean
(with p = 1,2 for AM, RMS respectively)

Name: tasi 2007-10-27 7:11

isn't that exactly what i said :S

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-27 9:10

>>19
(1+1/1)^2+(0+1/0)2 = 2?
What the fuck are you taking?
I mean, seriously, how could you even think that that is the case, especially when you have damn well proved it below.

Name: Anonymous 2007-10-28 9:59

>>22

Can you read?
I'm not >>19 btw

>>15 claimed (a + 1/a) ( and hence (a + 1/a)^2 ) was minimised at a=1/2 with (a + 1/a) = 2.5

This is obviously untrue as a = 1 gives (a + 1/a) = 2 < 2.5

Name: tasi 2007-10-29 11:57

But a can't equal 1, it's out of the given limits of a+b=1 and a and b being greater than 0

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List