Kabbala and modern "Science"

Concerning the present emphasis on the assumptive basis of all modern cosmology, the following summary of the deceptive role of Talmudic /Kabbalic Judaism masquerading as "science" supplies an indispensable framework for understanding not only how the majority of the Jewish people, but the entire world has been deceived about the size and nature of the universe and the nature and plan of the God behind all of it:

1) All of the three props holding up the present cosmological Paradigm-- Relativity, Big Bang, Expanding Universe--represent the fulfillment of a "Creation Scenario" of Rabbinic writings in the anti-Christ Mystic Kabbala "holy book" of Pharisaic Judaism from the 1st, 12th 13th, and 16th centuries particularly. There are three possible explanations for those documented facts:

a) A handful of Pharisaic Rabbis (Rebbes) were supernaturally gifted to lay out a cosmological plan that would destroy the credibility of the Biblical "Creation Scenario"...and hence the credibility of the Biblical Jesus as the revelator of God’s Plan for mankind. These "sages" envisioned a cosmology that would progressively make the universe so vast and old, and the stars so distant that they could never get around the Earth nightly. This vision would destroy in one blow the Biblical Model of a non-moving Earth and lay the foundation for putting the stars so far away that only Kabbalist Big Bang Kosmology could explain it all...(but the explanation was to always be called "science" and never "religion", especially anti-Christ Phariseeism) ; or:

b) Impartial, purely altruistic truth-seeking secular-minded scientists have--with no religion-connected agenda influencing them--coincidentally and unwittingly brought to pass all the necessary elements of the Rabbinic evolutionary "Origins Scenario" from Copernicus through Darwin ,Einstein, Penzias, and NASA’s Sagan and Goldin

Big Bang hypothesis comes straight out of the Kabbala (Cabala) which is found in the anti-Christian "holy book" Zohar.

The Big Bang hypothesis--which is now the keystone of virtually all modern astronomical musings-- incorporates at least these four features (in addition to the Copernican Model) which cannot be altered lest NASA's plans (along with all of modern academic astronomy and physics) fall flat. These four features are:

    A tiny bit of exploding energy, not God, created the universe and all that is in it.

    That exploded energy and all it allegedly created is still receding from the blast at great speed and provides a central plank in modern cosmology referred to as the expanding universe.

    The Big Blast occurred 15-20 billion years ago.  Some of this gas/matter formed the Earth 4.6 billion years ago (give or take a couple of months). All the points of light called stars which we can see with our eyes and with normal telescopes are said to be many light years away. The invisible but technology-manufactured galaxies of stars are said to be hundreds, and thousands, and millions, and billions of light years away...and on and on and on and on and on....

    Einstein (named "Person of the Century" before '99 ended) still dictates the parameters of cosmology from the grave. The speed limit he put on light travel, the ether he removed so his calculations would work, the elasticity of time in space travel, the dogma that all motion is relative (the train and the train station nonsense), etc., is all cosmological gospel in the textbooks.

Since the Big Bang is the capstone of this gargantuan edifice of evidence-free hypotheses, discovering its roots should be of particular interest not only to those who hotly maintain that "Real Science" must be free of any kind of religious contamination or manipulation, but also to all folks anywhere who prefer Truth to deception regardless of any severe jolts to their personal beliefs and training which might result.

Nuclear physicist, Dr. Gerald Schroeder, lets this cat out of the bag in his 17 page Web article entitled: "The Age of the Universe". Schroeder--formerly on the MIT staff, a member of the Atomic Energy Commission, author, lecturer in Jerusalem, etc., does not challenge the Big Bang cosmology and all that rests upon it in this revealing article. He supports all of it. Indeed, the thrust of his article is to demonstrate that hundreds of years ago the Kabbala set forth a clear description of what is now called the Big Bang explanation for the origin of the universe. In other words: Big Bang cosmology has its roots in the Kabbala.

The evidence Schroeder presents is two-fold: A) That the Jewish Torah word for "the first day" in Genesis is really "day one", and the Hebrew meaning of that allows not only for the Big Bang's 15 billion year odyssey, but that it also accommodates Einstein's Relativity in all of its space, matter, and time hypotheses.

But, not to worry, the Kabbalist (Cabalist) Nachmanides (Rabbi ben Nachman: 1194-1270) does provide Dr. Schroeder (and all of modern physics and astronomy!) with the "Scriptural", Spiritual foundation that he (and how many others?!) are using to justify and establish Big Bangism and all that goes with it...all the while presenting Big Bangism as a purely secular "scientific" concept.

"Nachmanides was the foremost halakist [rabbinical discussions of purely legal matters in the Talmud] of his age. Like Maimonides  before him, Nachmanides was a Spaniard who was both a physician and a great Torah scholar. However, unlike the rationalist Maimonides, Nachmanides had a strong mystical bent. His biblical commentaries are the first ones to incorporate the mystical teachings of kabala."

There is mention also that the kabbalah teaches a "belief in reincarnation"; that "kabbalah was widely considered to be the  true Jewish theology between 1500 and 1800, and almost no one attacked it"; that "in recent years, there has been an upsurge of interest in kabbalah, and today it is commonly studied among Hasidic  Jews, and among many non-Orthodox Jews WHO ARE PART OF THE COUNTERCULTURE."

"Nachmanides the kabbalist...says that although the days [of Genesis One] are 24 hours each, they contain 'kol yemot ha olam'--all the ages and all the secrets of the world.... Nachmanides says: There's only one physical creation, and that creation was a tiny speck.... In that speck was all the raw material that should be used for making everything else.... As this speck expanded out, this substance--so thin that it has no essence--turned into matter as we know it.... The moment that matter formed from this substanceless substance, time  grabs hold.... Einstein's...E=MC2, tells us that energy can change into matter. And once it changes into matter, time grabs hold....  This moment of time before the clock begins for the Bible lasted about 1/100,000 of a second. A miniscule time. But in that time, the universe expanded from a tiny speck to about the size of the solar system. From that moment on we have matter, and time flows outward."

[c.3pp. further along...] "Let's look at the development of time, day by day, based on the expansion factor [1 million times 1 million from start till now].... The calculations come out to be as follows:

    The first Biblical day lasted 24 hours...But...from our perspective it was 8 billion years.

    The second day of 24 hours...was 4 billion years.

    The third day...was 2 billion years.

    The fourth day...1 billion years.

    The fifth day...1/2 billion years.

    The sixth day...1/4 billion years.

"Then you add it up [Schroeder continues] and you get 15 3/4 billion years... the same as modern cosmology allows...."

Well, in sanforized form there you have the Kabbalist basis for the Big Bang, the expanding universe, the Einsteinian clock, and key aspects of modern textbook cosmology.

Rabbi =/= Rebbe

Dumbfuck.

tl;dr

but I guess this is about a Jew conspiracy to take over science

If modern cosmology is wrong, then what is right?  The Bible tells us very little about cosmology.

>>2
The big bang is not a prerequisite to all modern cosmology/physics.  It is a model that best fits with the data we have of the stars (and hence its consequences are researched in great detail).  There does exist metrics that do not have a big bang singularity, and are infinite in duration in both directions.

It was never impossible that God created the big bang.

This area of cosmology is definitely not evidence free; many efforts are currently under way to find moar evidence.

>>4
Each of these segments are 24 hours in which reference frame?  Earth didn't even exist for much of that time; how can you possibly say what "our perspective" is?

By changing the initial "8 billion years", you can have the series sum to any number you want.  This proves nothing.