Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

Gilgamesh does not exist

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-04 9:51 ID:onjmW/9t

Gilgamesh was king of Uruk right? Then how do you know that Uruk existed? Written in the books or gasp wikipedia? I say without proof that Uruk existed, Uruk does not exist. Therefore, Gilgamesh does not exist.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-04 13:06 ID:0N5T47Vp

Uruk exists because the site has been excavated by archeologists. Are you telling me that because I have not personally seen Uruk, that it does not exist? By that logic, I declare that (along with Gilgamesh) Abraham Lincoln, Albert Einstein, and Australian people do not exist either.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-04 14:01 ID:onjmW/9t

Unlike Australian people, there's no other proof that Uruk or Babylonia existed other than archaic scribes and tablets. Even how cuneiform was translated into language we can understand is not that credible.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-04 14:49 ID:0N5T47Vp

Are you stupid, or just very dense? Aside from the tablets and scrolls, IT IS A PHYSICAL PLACE, YOU CAN TRAVEL THERE FOR YOURSELF AND FIND OUT.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-04 14:51 ID:0N5T47Vp

Are you stupid or something? This is not like Sodom and Gemorrah, URUK IS A PHYSICAL PLACE, YOU CAN TRAVEL THERE(to the ruins) FOR YOURSELF AND FIND OUT.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-04 14:52 ID:0N5T47Vp

Pardon me for the double post.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-04 16:28 ID:UCPR57kV

OP, are you stupid or something? This is not a fucking fairytale book, URUK IS A FUCKING PHYSICAL PLACE, YOU CAN TRAVEL THERE (to the ruins) and SEE FOR YOURSELF YOU DOUCHE.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-04 22:46 ID:Heaven

URUK IS A FUCKING PHYSICAL PLACE IT IS THE SAME PLACE YOU READ IN YOUR FUCKING FUCKITY TABLETS GILGAMESH IS REAL OP YOU MOTHERFUCKING STUPID DENSE NIGGER

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-05 1:13 ID:Heaven

Hurr hurr 0N5T47Vp you sound so smart!

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-05 6:35 ID:SYbcpwx3

But have you been there? How can you even tell that it's indeed the fabled Uruk that "existed" 2000 years ago? You accept every little bit of shit that's fed to you don't you?

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-05 6:43 ID:Jr7gq90w

Wait a minute, are you telling me you don't trust the carbon dating process? If that is the case than there is no hope for you. Arguing that Gilgamesh is not real is one thing, but it is a fact that Uruk existed. And yes, I have been there, its definitly Uruk, no doubt about it.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-05 6:47 ID:p14qriST

>>10
Have you ever detected a neutrino?

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-05 13:03 ID:OvliKETI

>>10
4000+
2000 gregorian years+ 2000+ pregregorian years

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-05 23:23

>>10
FUCK OFF.  Uruk is proven to have existed.

Name: RedCream 2008-01-06 1:43

Did somebody say "Gilgamesh"?

Name: sage 2008-01-06 10:23

sage

Name: RedCream 2008-01-06 14:01

I could have sworn that somebody said "Gilgamesh"!

Name: RedCream 2008-01-06 17:32

Honeslty, there's some Gilgamesh going down here.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-06 20:43

this is a question of history, not science/math... learn to read a fucking board title

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-07 9:59

>>19
are you stupid or something? Gilgamesh IS science! Gilgamesh IS math! Gilgamesh is ta∵∴s∵∴n!

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List