Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

0.9999 = 1?

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-02 16:52 ID:EsIu42f3

is  0.999999999999999999 = to 1?

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-02 16:57 ID:q8JidKxt

No.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-02 16:59 ID:Heaven

I'm sick and tired of seeing threads on this.

OP, do some research, stay the fuck off this board until you are convinced that 0.9~ is exactly 1, and never ever consider ever asking if 9999/10000 is 1, or even if 999999999999999999/10000000000000000000 = 1

wikipedia/0.999...

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-02 17:19 ID:zSY5ncPz

wtf kind of question is that?

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-02 17:24 ID:EsIu42f3

"wtf kind of question is that?"

It is one that demands an answer, young padewan.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-02 18:02 ID:OSeDWSBs

EVERYONE agrees it is both true and false. It's a question of philosophy if you believe it or not.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-02 18:12 ID:gpNZM1mk

>>6

Idiots who don't understand maths agree it's both true and false.

People who aren't retarded know that 0.999~ is defined to be exactly the same as one in the construction of the real numbers.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-02 18:41 ID:gLgqD5TD

1/3 is 0.3333333333..., RIGHT?
and

3*1/3 is the same as 1, RIGHT?

and if 1/3 is 0.33333333333...,
3*0.3333333... is 0.99999..., RIGHT?

therefore

0.99999999... = 1

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-02 18:41 ID:gLgqD5TD

OH I CAN SEE IT NOW

Name: sage 2007-09-02 18:44 ID:Heaven

x = 0.9~
10x = 9.9~
9x = 10x - x = 9.9~ - 0.9~ = 9

qed

Name: chris 2007-09-02 18:52 ID:o6N1T5au

wow i was honestly convinced that .99999999999... is one because there are an infinite number of nines.  if you disagree you simply dont understand the concpet of inifnity, lol

Name: chris 2007-09-02 18:53 ID:o6N1T5au

very nice proof by the way... best one i've seen

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-02 19:11 ID:z3exrY2z

Unfortunately, one of the worst there is, as far as rigor goes.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-02 19:11 ID:d2euCQCI

>>11

it's really more to do with a limit, i'd say, but whatever

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-02 19:49 ID:gpNZM1mk

>>13

True dat.

A proof is not even necesary, there's nothing to prove. By definition they're equal.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-03 0:17 ID:6vqbKWCg

>>1
>0.999999999999999999 = to 1?
No, because you have specified a finite number of nines.

An infinite number of nines, yeah. Finite number, no.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-03 4:27 ID:ZCF1AJi5

come on what happen to giving up on measuring those lonely quantities that are less than 1 but more than 0.999999999999999999999999999999999999999999

Name: RedCream 2007-09-03 12:45 ID:kGkSCUKA

Notation Correction? : 0.999... = 0.9 = 1

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-03 14:21 ID:Heaven

commie lies

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-03 22:34 ID:cp/xQUsY

1-(1*10^-∞) where (1*10^-∞) ≠0 , so 1-(1*10^-∞)≠1-0, so 1-(1*10^-∞)≠1 and finally 0.9~≠1
The fact on experimental measurement 0.9~=1 its just because it doesn't matter, they are NEARLY the same and theres infinitesimal difference between them. But mathematically they are not the same for obvious reasons.

Name: 4tran 2007-09-03 23:23 ID:Heaven

>>20
Infinitesimals are not real numbers.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-04 0:43 ID:Heaven

>>21
that's racist

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-04 1:57 ID:028Nhn1B

look at it this way.

Say you have a perfectly round pie. You take an infinitely small slice from that pie. Is it still a whole pie?

Here's an easier one to grasp, using exponentials. Say you have two graphed points, point A and point B. You move point B half way closer to point A, to shorten the distance between them by half, so they are %50 as far from each other as before. Say you take away half the distance between them once more...and once more...and once more...and so on. The points will keep getting closer to each other each time, but they will never meet, no matter how many times you divide by half. And, as the distance between the points will never reach zero after dividing the distance in half infinity times, 0.9~ will never equal 1. It will keep getting closer, but never get there.

Name: nurr 2007-09-04 3:08 ID:AwkU5fof

>>23
we have this thing called infinity in math.. and the proof of this uses exactly your argument, plus infinity. The idea is that of a limit. We say that .999... approaches 1. That is to say, the distance from .999 to 1 decreases to 0 as n goes to infinity. There's no number less than 1 that is greater than .999... Just try to think of one.

We say that the series 9/10^n converges to 1 as n goes to infinity. When we write down an infinite series like 1/3=.333... or 1=.999..., what we are expressing is the limit, that number that the series converges to.

To use your pie example, let's say we had a pie of area 1 and somehow broke it into an infinite number of pieces, with each piece's area equal to 9/10^n, where n goes from 1 to infinity. Do the areas of all those pieces add up to 1?


This isn't up for argument. It follows logically from accepted axioms.

Name: RedCream 2007-09-04 3:50 ID:y9v14J1C

0.999... + Δ = 1

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-04 5:13 ID:oyvkm/06

>>25
you blatant, blatant faggot.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-04 9:03 ID:e9SSdnTe

hai guise
0.999... + 0 = 1

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-04 9:24 ID:Heaven

Wikipedia article explains this.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-04 10:36 ID:tCgBHRsr

hey guyz is 0.998... = 0.999... ?

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-04 11:40 ID:Audl73IF

>>29
No, it is 0.001... short

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-04 11:48 ID:xII7a4FX

>>30

We don't know what he's intending after the 8, actually.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-04 12:06 ID:OW7E7eGB

>>1
No.
It is proved that between two real numbers (like
0.999999999999999999
and
1
in this case) there is an infinite amount of numbers.

after 0.999999999999999999000... there's
      0.999999999999999999100...
      0.999999999999999999200...
and so on.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-04 15:33 ID:028Nhn1B

>>23 here...

after sleeping on the matter, my mind is basically changed. I wasn't countering in genuine infinity before (it is, after all, very difficult to conceptualize).

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-04 15:41 ID:IDQS41rs

>>31
We don't know what >>30 is intending after the 1, actually.

Name: Anonymous 2007-09-04 18:54 ID:xII7a4FX

>>34
Haha, ok.

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-08 6:23

leave here with your witchcraft and devil prophecies

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List