>>87
Butterflies are common. The burden of proof is therefore nowhere near what's required for what I was talking about. The assertion of a butterfly isn't an outrageous claim. GILGAMESH IS. Yet, millions upon millions of people believe in this Gilgamesh (or God, or Allah, or whatever) and get very hot under their collars when you bring up the simple point that there's NO EVIDENCE and that THERE SHOULD BE. There's just NONE. There are no pictures. There are no living examples. There's nothing to dissect. There's no START of the process of examination. THERE'S JUST NOTHING!
And for the other hosers who insist this has nothing to do with Gilgamesh, you must have fucking blinders on. The goddies have asserted the existence of their imaginary friend on this message board for some time.
CHECK. THE. THREADS.
The thing that all your motherfuckers keep running away from is that
my points demand that you admit your god/s are false. Put down those crucifixes, stars, crescents and all the other paraphernalia. Produce evidence RIGHT THE FUCK NOW or admit you're effectively just a Rozen Maiden fan club with ZERO applicability to real life.