>>78
HUMOR, do you speak it?
The point of the humor was to question the accuracy of whatever evidence is used, even if you do get some. Is what you see really what is there? Is what you hear accurate? Is everyone within a mile of you simultaneously hallucinating the same thing? You constantly demand proof/evidence, but how do we know the proof or evidence we get is proof/evidence?
I claim butterflies exist. You demand proof. I give you a picture of a butterfly. You claim it's shooped. I give you a living butterfly. You claim it's a mechanical imitation of something that doesn't exist. I dissect the creature. You claim it's a genetically engineered monstrosity. I show you 1000 butterflies. You claim it's mass production... The uncertainty continues infinitely.
Nothing is ever certain.