Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

burden of proof

Name: Anonymous 2007-08-01 2:55 ID:NrqcfiTS

excuse for debate club fags and defendents in court, amirite?

Name: RedCream 2007-08-15 3:05 ID:4mOdejvx

>>77
This nonexistent "Satan" character is a derivative of the same nonexistent Judeo-Christian semi-pantheon.  By using a divine power to disprove a divine power, you'd still be fulfilling the requirement for proof.  However, there are no examples of divine power, so all that's pointless anyway.

Seriously, are you 14 years old or something?  What you said isn't even a point of argument.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List