- there would be no war
- there would be no poverty
- there would be more understanding and hapiness and open discussion
- the military-industrial complex (a product of MALE thinking) would crumble
- there would be no pollution, because men make smokestack because it reminds them of their penises.
- no one would be trapped in boring, inefficient office jobs, becuase skyscrapers are just big penis
- there would be no violence, becuase guns and knifes are just violent metal penises (what is it with the male obsession with the penis ??! it must have to do with there egotism, being insecure because Womyn are better)
- instead oft he penis intruding everything, the vagina is loving and welcoming (Womyn truly DESERVE to run the world after millenia of hypocritical male opression !!
And because of artificial insemination this is possible!
1) likely
2) unlikely
3) unknown
4) see 1)
5) smokestacks are designed to send pollution away from the employees, not as phallic symbols
6) unlikely
7) unlikely
8) doesn't make sense
Name:
Anonymous2007-07-06 3:36 ID:9Sg+vH+T
>>1
I don't think you understand what artificial insemination is. In artificial insemination, you inseminate semen. Hence "inseminate".
Is it just my imagination, or are the noisiest proponents of feminism in fact female supremacists?
I mean, don't get me wrong, I'm all for feminism, assuming it's about females fighting to be treated as equals to males, it's just that all the feminist rhetoric that I've been seeing and hearing lately borders on -- and even equates to -- female supremacist rhetoric, which I'd argue defeats the whole purpose of their initial goal. Being arrogant is not a good way to get people to listen to you, and neither is generalising about them.
Name:
Anonymous2007-07-06 9:59 ID:JI6KICGt
>>6
No war is likely? I think you're giving them too much credit.
Name:
Anonymous2007-07-06 10:13 ID:Us5d7QUO
>>1
all of these are extremely unlikely
+you misspelled women
+you suck
+you smell worse than the fat guy that lives down my street that smokes 12 packs of siggarettes and drinks 9 bottles of beer every 3 hours, he uses perfume that smells like shit as well
Many will die because Womyn loves creating holes like their vaginas. surely the street will be littered with potholes
Name:
Anonymous2007-07-09 8:44 ID:KJbH+f8O
there would still be war, it would just be over stupid stuff, like someone being pissy when its PMS time
and before I get slapped with the sexist label, I wanna say that I'm not sexist, I'm an equalist, which is why feminists piss me off, thinking females are better is just as bad as thinking men are better...
freaking morons
Name:
Anonymous2007-07-11 0:10 ID:sU5Nt3/h
>>18
Many will die because Myn loves creating cones like their penises. surely the street will be littered with traffic cones
It appears that by #1's definitions, Margaret Thatcher was not a woman. Has the Learned Egalatarian Sisters' Benevolent Order (i.e. L.E.S.B.O.) actually yanked Maggie's gender title, yet?
Wassamatta, #23 (skidoo!)? Does it bother you when someone brings up women in some sort of comparison basis? Doesn't it strike you that that is at least FAR more valid then people trying to insist (WITHOUT ANY EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER) that their imaginary friend (i.e. giant alien space monster) is real? At least we know women are real, since as a pervasive element of Human society they leave evidence all over the fucking place, which produces ready confirmation.
#25, do you mean moi? If so, how can you even make a sensible comparison since I'm being compared to something that doesn't exist? At least have the intellectual decency to compare me to something that lives and is seen and heard by other Humans.
>>24
Imaginary space/sky man/friend/monster is totally unrelated to the subject of the thread. Given your similar rants in other threads, you must have been thoroughly traumatized by some earlier experience with theists. My condolences.
With regards to your question, gender comparison is more valid than asserting the existence of imaginary man, but that doesn't make the subject any moar related to /sci/
>>26
Comparisons do not require physical existence. It only requires both items and the comparison itself to be well defined. You're obviously larger than an atom, yet atoms do not live, and are not seen/heard by other humans. To be sure, comparing non existent things constitutes little moar than philosophical wankery (just in case you're concerned about the utility of such endeavors).
#27, I said "sensible" comparison. Comparing me to Harry Potter, for instance, would be fairly insensible since I'd only be held to the standard of an imaginary person, who even though modeled on other Humans, still doesn't exist and has no real modes of behavior which I can make use of.
As for the atom, well, there's no rational doubt about atoms. Even tossing all the other strong evidence aside, scanning electron microscopes have imaged the bumps that compose the surface of solids, hence ATOMS. Since such microscopes (in reality, nanoscopes since they are getting down to that scale) use electrons as the "working particles" to feel out atoms and make the image, the we also know electrons exist (again, even if you toss out the mountains of other evidence).
Name:
4tran2007-07-22 23:14 ID:Qc4nfK5Q
>>29
I see what you mean now. I don't think >>25 meant the comparison in any sensible manner. He's probably just exasperated with you.
I worded that badly; I was not questioning the existence of atoms. It was just a remark that "lives and is seen and heard by other Humans" is probably not the best indicator. There is indeed mountains of evidence suggesting atoms (hence the existence of the periodic table).
Name:
Anonymous2007-07-28 0:36 ID:PW1FDhw+
Anon, war would be waged at every shopping center. The Battle For Capris On Sale will go on for many decades.
1) Margaret Thatcher, bitch!
2) Yes there would be. Women, by their very nature, refuse to work, therefore there would be no money.
3) Sure, because women sure love to listen to other people's problems rather than bitch about their own shit.
4) Once again, Margaret Thatcher, bitch!
5) There would still be pollution. Women would just dump their used tampons on the side of the road and then bitch about how filthy the ditches are becoming.
6) True, nobody would work since women are lazy bitches
7) Bullshit. Women are far more likely to become violent than men. Men just tend to do a better job when they get angry.
8) Fucking Georgia O'Keefe wannabe.
Name:
Anonymous2009-03-26 2:09
Actually, if womyn ran the world, man would go extinct because of his inability to evolve himself, whereas womyn understand this and practice it since the day they were born. Men are rigid.
I know this because I am a man, and I am rigid; knowing this means I can take the steps to adapt and evolve myself into something different than I am now. That is my choice, womyn usually believe more in choice than in necessity, but necessity cannot be ignored; hence the importance of choice.
Choice; prepare before the necessity becomes a requirement.
Recovery; to choose to take care of one's own situation.
That is the true nature of womyn. I do my best to introduce many qualities of womyn into my life. Only a womyn can understand my reasonings for making this choice.