Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

1=0

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-22 13:39 ID:iHQLwGhu

prove me wrong.

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-22 13:45 ID:aIvoLJZM

NO U

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-23 2:58 ID:Heaven

1 != 0

qed

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-23 8:48 ID:qztrpqqS

   1. 1 is a natural number.
   2. Every natural number is equal to itself (equality is reflexive).
   3. For all natural numbers a and b, a = b if and only if b = a (equality is symmetric).
   4. For all natural numbers a, b, and c, if a = b and b = c then a = c (equality is transitive).
   5. If a = b and b is a natural number then a is a natural number.
   6. If a is a natural number then Sa is a natural number.
   7. If a and b are natural numbers then a = b if and only if Sa = Sb.
   8. If a is a natural number then Sa is not equal to 1.
   9. For every set K, if 1 is in K and for every natural number x in K, Sx is also in K, then every natural number is in K. (It makes no difference here whether all elements of K are natural numbers.)

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-23 10:38 ID:f4lZ0h7T

>>4
Prove axioms 1 to 9 are correct.

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-23 11:12 ID:RDs1YRgu

>>5
Look up 'axiom' in a dictionary.

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-23 11:14 ID:YwTshg1W

>>5 You made me lol.

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-23 11:40 ID:eU9T9xxp

>>4
What is Sa, Sb etc?

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-23 14:17 ID:K2iuZ5Wz

>>8
Successors

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-23 14:24 ID:UUEBRBqU

ITT the peano axioms copy-pasted from wikipedia and a guy who doesn't understand logic or math arguing with them.

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-23 14:55 ID:Heaven

>>10
Please enlighten us then.

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-23 16:45 ID:5ffgGNlv

>>6
needs to grow a sense of humour

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-23 18:33 ID:eU9T9xxp

>>9
Ok but I don't see how >>4 proves that 0 is not 1.

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-23 19:21 ID:UUEBRBqU

>>11
he already gave the axioms.  i mean, i guess you could say 0 = 1 if you really want, but then you'll need another symbol to represent the additive identity, as you'll be using a different definition of 0 than the one thats usually implied.  (or a different definition of 1, depending on how you want to look at it)  as far as youre concerned, we just consider them different quantities for the sake of making them useful.

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-23 19:23 ID:K2iuZ5Wz

>>13
>>4 isn't proving anything.

If you use the Peano axioms (starting at 0 for convenience, otherwise you would need a bijection etc blahblahblah), you can just use the axiom that if a is a natural number, then S(a) is not 0. Since S(0) = 1, you can conclude that 0 is not equal to 1.

If you use the set theoretic construction you can say 0 is not 1 since {{}} is a proper subset of {{}, {{}}}, so the two can't be equivalent.

Or you can give your own construction of any number system you wish, but that's no guarantee it'll behave how you want.

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-24 9:22 ID:QildAsNi

>>3
GREAT WIN!

Name: Anonymous 2007-06-24 23:25 ID:2cweKY1q

>>1
Is that 1 equals zero, or 1 is assigned to zero?

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-18 3:03

I feel the need, the need for weed!

Marijuana MUST be legalized.

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List