>>1
i consider myself open minded, and if ever i was shown convincing evidence of drastic differences between the races, i wouldn't outright deny it, but a propaganda video on youtube isn't convincing evidence in the least. also, i'll admit that the fact that the majority of proponents of these sorts of ideas are retards with failing logic has crafted a bias against it within me.
again though, I would be open to the idea of racial differences, since there are apparent physical differences, in things like bone structure, and muscular growth, that are quite observable and documented. so, i couldn't rule out the possibility of other sorts of differences. even given that though, it would be a whole other moral question about how to react to that. and furthermore, i wouldn't have justification to believe that the differences were as pronounced across the entirety of the population, or even necessarily whether the differences were better or worse.
Name:
Anonymous2007-06-19 20:23 ID:Jv6ihYHM
>>7
Yes it is a moral question. The question is either white people survive within their own geographically separate state from non-whites or they will become minorities in all their own historic homelands.
PS: If white people are so bad at maintaining control of their own historic homelands, why do you think they're _better_ than other races? That pretty much indicates the opposite.
There are certainly racial differences. How that produces the result of "therefore we can kill the nignogs" is beyond my understanding. If you're really superior than your fellow man, then demonstrate that by living well and keeping your powder dry. Living well was always the best revenge.
Robots are superior to you all. Besides, why not use behavior to determine someone's race instead of the other way around?
Name:
Anonymous2007-06-22 0:34 ID:VAPqe5ny
>>14
Ad hominem attacks, it is as if I was talking to a child.
Name:
Anonymous2007-06-22 4:32 ID:GiEZ6fhk
>>13
actually, the "cure" would be either massive interbreeding or genocide, as these would remove diversity rather than just distance the diverse, as yours would do.
Correlation is not causation. You need to specify exact genes and how they determine nervous system function. Even then, gene therapy, or even chemical supplements, could probably "fix" any of these "problems" you're talking about.
He didn't say it was. His point was that the fact that the European civilization has been more successful it doesn't mean that the white race is mentally superior.
European civ has been more successful for the reasons well stated by Jared Diamond in his seminal work "Guns, Germs and Steel". No racial differences were required to create the dominance of the White man in those situations.
Look how the White march down Africa stalled and collapsed. White success in Africa was only created by leapfrogging via the ocean onto coastal areas of similar climate to Europe.
LATITUDINAL GEOGRAPHY is what creates successful cultural expansions, not longitudinal ones. The White Power chumps will never admit that, however. They just hate n1ggers.
#25, I hate to repeat myself, but I'm right. Some wiki can't compare to the decades of data collection performed by Jared Diamond, which you must now read since you sound like a reactionary goofball:
>>26
I saw the guns germs and Steel Flim on PBS, Awhile ago.
I think the main point of it is that it tells the viewer;
Europeans were and are the best race and most succesfull throughout history. Thats all I need to hear.
#28, RedCream = geophysical realist. The Indo-Europeans had the singular geographic advantage that quite simply allowed successful spreading ALONG LATITUDES. Their land routes were workable and their crops were largely successful in new lands. In addition, the lack of tropical vegetation and climate gave them food storage and variety not possible in most of Africa.
Now STFU. You're just a demented idiot who likes to needlessly politicize a purely geographic argument.
Name:
Anonymous2007-06-28 0:17 ID:2ZkXdFEN
>>29
I don't mind non-whites, as long as they stay away from me, my country, and I.
#30, what's your country? If it's the USA, all the non-Whites born there are also citizens. If anything, a proper claim to the prairies and forests of North America belongs to the Red Man.
Name:
Anonymous2007-06-28 22:31 ID:2ZkXdFEN
>>31
They should have had better immigration laws and they would be better off.
#32, a nation that doesn't bother to enforce their immigration laws is a nation in severe trouble in the first place.
Name:
Anonymous2007-06-29 7:59 ID:1gmDb0sh
>>12 >>24 >>26 >>29 >>31 >>33
PROTIP: click on the post number to automatically reply.
PROTIP: recream=disgruntled geophysical realist who thinks he know something cause he took a few college courses on culture.
>>34
Did any of the other posters take college courses on culture? If not, then redcream's statements are more valid.
Redcream: I buy your argument that geography/climate had a lot to do with the supremacy of white man, but what about the native americans? Most of them lived in a temperate zone, yet they didn't have nearly the technology of the Europeans.
Name:
Anonymous2009-03-18 3:08
The word pirahna, is all I can think of that rhymes with marijuana