>>5
how do i strawman?
you're right, that sounds like an anti-semitic argument, which is why that's not a non-anti-semitic argument. one would be something more like, "why was a group of immigrants granted sovereignty in this region?".
additionally, the rest of what you said isn't relevant, both because no one mentioned anything about that, and the question is whether or not the state should be there in the first place, not whether they've behaved since establishment.
you're rather irrational.