Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

2+2=4...?

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-08 8:36 ID:KIHEzout

I'm asking in all seriousness, but what level/area of mathematics is needed prove simple statements like 2+2=4 and what not? Can it be proved with elementary math, or do you have to get into axioms and other crazy shit?

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-08 8:54 ID:RKFV/Tz0

Genesis 34:15

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-08 8:56 ID:rey0ob/x

Any powerfull formal system with arithmetic axioms. See Calculus of Inductive Constructions : http://coq.inria.fr

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-08 10:20 ID:oM6GsRcn

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-08 10:40 ID:KIHEzout

>>3
>>4

Thanks, exactly what I was looking for. Math is awesome :)

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-08 16:30 ID:zIClJCnt

I didn't know it was possible to need proof for something like 2+2=4. I mean I can fucking prove it with my fingers.

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-08 16:39 ID:oM6GsRcn

>>6
You're expanding the expression to (1+1)+(1+1)=(1+1+1+1), which is true because addition is associative. That's not too different from what's done in a formal proof.

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-08 18:32 ID:KIHEzout

>>6
You can't just prove shit with your fingers in math man, everything has to be rigorous.

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-08 23:55 ID:8n3gzQEw

2+2=4 Addition Postulate


Easy i proved it

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-09 11:48 ID:65mmoBSo

Yeah, the fact that 2+2=4 is simply true because we have defined addition. We simply understand +, in that case, to mean "the usual addition", sort of a mathematical connotation, and the fact that two plus two actually does equal four is true because that's how we've defined addition.

Alternatively, you could define addition so that 2+2=5, but that definition of addition isn't quite as useful :P

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-09 19:49 ID:GaVUrf06

or you could define 5 such that 2+2=5

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-10 5:37 ID:Gi/UYuAe

>>6
I can prove my fingers into your face.

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-10 13:56 ID:Sa4wyc9r

>>12
ill prove my wang into your noggin

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-10 14:30 ID:OejVzP/Y

>>6
you should probably get out of math if youre in it.

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-10 14:55 ID:0Ul495Uh

this thread is full of retards.

the correct answer is "depends on how anal you want to be about it."

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-18 4:11 ID:fYxIjABF

>>4
This is very interesting. Thanks.

Name: yay 2007-03-18 4:50 ID:ecU0WrxU

set theory.  you start with nothing and prove elementary mathematics

Name: Sponge 2007-03-18 7:19 ID:191+E4zG

We did that kind of stuff in my number theory class using axioms integer axioms.

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-18 8:48 ID:VHqk0bxt

take 2 apples and count them, write it down
write the + symbol as you are going to get another 2 apples and see what they make
take another set of 2 apples and count them, write it down next to the + as this set of apples is the one you are going to put with the others
write equals as you are finnished getting the apples
place thew apples together and count them...

1,2,3,4

2+2=4

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-18 8:53 ID:i47MTEaf

>>19
fail.

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-18 9:30 ID:fYxIjABF

>>19
Define 2. Define apples. Define count. Define write it down. Define see what they make. Define equals. Define place them together.

Etc.

Also, fail.

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-18 22:27 ID:tQt69nd8

>>21
Define define. Define fail.  :P

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List