Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

imposible question

Name: ozzer 2007-02-22 20:01 ID:4ngZpUfK

If it is 0 degrees celcius today, and it is twice as cold tomorow, how cold is it?

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-22 20:43 ID:JdzeDLhv

Twice as cold implies a measuring point in the past that the first  temperature is relative to. Without that past temperature to judge by, this question is unanswerable.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-22 21:05 ID:t6ITZw9L

you have to use an absolute scale like Kelvin.

0 C = 273.15 K

i.e tmr will be 136.575K = -136.575K

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-22 23:02 ID:+WFVWlJy

>>3
So much win on the science, yet so much fail on the math.

273.15ºC. We will all fucking burn to death.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-22 23:52 ID:D5z0Pni3

>>4
twice as cold, not twice as hot.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-23 0:02 ID:MusP8Me3

>>1
-1 deg C

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-23 0:41 ID:H/6vTO87

>>5
Right you are. Massive fail for me on reading comprehension, then. :P

Does 'twice as cold' really make sense from a scientific standpoint? After all, cold doesn't actually exist.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-23 0:57 ID:Heaven

Sage for trying to destroy /sci/

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-23 7:45 ID:pGeSYSdG

You can only have cold relative to another thing, usually freezing, boiling, or absolute zero

Name: AIDS 2007-02-23 16:45 ID:UxbryDYQ

given that by twice as cold you mean half as hot on an absolute zero scale:
0C = 273K
/2= 136.5K
change it back to C = 136.5 - 273 =
-136.5 C
just like >>3 said

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-23 17:03 ID:Wm1L4HZv

Do people actually say twice as cold, thrice as cold, etc?

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-23 19:02 ID:H/6vTO87

>>11
By people, do you mean the masses (most of whom still need to be convinced that cold does not exist) or scientists?

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-24 18:47 ID:bx2F6yXi

>12

scientists are not people.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-24 21:44 ID:Heaven

>>13
fail for leaving out a >

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List