Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

What's so great about math?

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-21 11:10 ID:VxgCW9Uo

Analysis kind of stuff and rings and fields. How completely useless.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-21 11:54 ID:iOx9jMN2

>>1
Everything you use today exists because of math.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-21 14:34 ID:9rFlmF3/

>>2

liar liar pants on fire! i buy everything from IKEA or the grocery store, not my math teacher!

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-21 15:35 ID:CGYpnRTN

Math lets boring people be accountants, and very boring people be actuaries.  The exquisitely dull dwell in the abstracted realms of 10-page proofs for their PhD in Dullebian Boringitorics.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-21 20:12 ID:z9XH9zto

>>4

These are the people who defined the universe you know and love.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-21 21:40 ID:/Jaj+eBF

Math is everything.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-21 22:51 ID:0cRChZ0z

Everything is math.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-22 0:08 ID:qggO1pZ+

We are Devo.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-22 7:30 ID:kJCea5W7

Stuck on maths homeworks I'm guessing?

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-22 15:56 ID:P44i32r/

>>9
lol true.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-22 16:18 ID:gaVJVxEV

We all use maths everyday

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-23 6:49 ID:cpg37n4B

>>1

If it weren't for the math that's applied to the domain of computers, we wouldn't have 4chan.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-23 7:41 ID:RTRqac9i

We wouldn't have anything 'without math', but then again math always is.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-23 7:44 ID:Z5JrplDo

No assholes bring their opinions to the field (except major assholes that nobody takes seriously)

I love math because among all the subjects I've ever had to study, it's the only one I haven't disagreed with or found flaws with. I've been troubled by it, but of course, it's very complex.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-23 16:58 ID:RTRqac9i

>>14
You've found flaws with everything you've studied, EH?

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-23 17:41 ID:rPJ/DQ1l

>>15
Excuse me? Can you read? He says he HASN'T disagreed OR found flaws with. God!

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-23 18:52 ID:6by8/w09

>>16
Excuse me? Can you read? He says he HASN'T disagreed OR found flaws with math, but he has with everything else.  God!

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-23 19:01 ID:RTRqac9i

Thanks >>17
for sticking up for my reading comprehension skills :)
>>16
You jerk!

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-23 23:28 ID:1x8uKAz5

I disagree.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-24 4:05 ID:Heaven

>>16 here, easy misconception anyone could have made. Haha.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-26 16:22 ID:6/h9DS2l

What mathematicians do today will probably come in handy in the future.  Medieval farmers probably would have thought that calculus was retarded and pointless, but it's pretty useful now, and it would have been back then had they used the appropriate technology.  Moreover, it would have aided them in developing that technology, so a good mathematician in the 800s could have done some amazing stuff.

There are many modern applications of algebra (e.g., cryptography, computer science, physics) and analysis (e.g., PDEs with applications in mechanical, chemical, and electrical engineering as well as in chemistry, biology, sociology, and physics, functional analysis with applications in computer science, physics, etc.), but the coolest applications are usually what comes after several generations-worth of seemingly unappliable mathematics.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-27 23:01 ID:S+fmso0U

>>21
Agreed, I mean look at the areas of math used in string theory.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-28 3:34 ID:nCyCZn0x

lolz

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-02 23:43 ID:3MMhZfp/

>>14
math has it's limits and flaws
a mathematician ironically proved it

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-03 0:04 ID:EPrNt9Wy

>>24
Limits, yes. Flaws? Not so much.

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-03 0:06 ID:W+7wCpnI

>>24
fail for misinterpreting godels incompleteness theorem, or maybe you were talking about tarski's indefinability theorem.

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-03 3:32 ID:B2QWimJn

1+1≠2

Name: FrozenVoid 2007-03-03 6:18 ID:Co+6yq4d

Mainstream mathematics is comparable to religion.

Name: namefaggot 2007-03-03 7:51 ID:i+S1D3wb

>>28
not really.

Name: FrozenVoid 2007-03-03 8:29 ID:Co+6yq4d

>>29
Defending their equations and theorems from a neutral point has never been the case with math or physics.
They are committed to the theory,as if it was a religious scripture.

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-03 8:49 ID:Heaven

x is comparable to y holds for all x,y

Name: FrozenVoid 2007-03-03 9:16 ID:Co+6yq4d

>>31
Its disallowed in mathematics.
Consider infinity.Every mathematician i seen argues until the bubbles come out of his mouth that infinity cannot be compared,manipulated or
operated on.WHILE HAPPILLY USING x/infinity=0 and infinity*-1=-infinity.

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-03 9:20 ID:Heaven

>>32
Nobody uses x/infinity = 0. -x means -1 * x, so the second one kind of makes sense, if infinity is to be treated as a signed number.

Name: FrozenVoid 2007-03-03 10:54 ID:Co+6yq4d

>>33
I refer you to wikipedia article on infinity.

Name: Anonymous 2007-03-03 11:54 ID:i7yeVX31

>>34
Wikipedia isn't a valid argument

Name: sage 2007-03-03 14:39 ID:Heaven

>>35
That is a tautology.

Name: FrozenVoid 2007-03-03 14:47 ID:Co+6yq4d

>>35
Its known that x/infinity=0 is false,but wikipedia and math books use it.
They don't consider the result is ranging from non-zero infinitesimal to 1
(when x=infinity).

Name: Anonymous 2013-10-29 3:18

Name: Anonymous 2013-11-20 4:23

Even numbers are like bricks, odd numbers are like clay, mathematics - child's play.

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List