Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

Calculus isn't true

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-07 23:30

OK, let's look at [f(x + h) - f(x)]/ h, now let h = 0

[f(x + 0) - f(x)] / 0 = 0/0

Calculus fails

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-08 0:04

lol you dont realy let h=0 you let it =0.0 repeting then dump a 1 at the end of that. man your sily.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-08 0:36 (sage)

>>2
oh fuck

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-08 19:11

>>2
FUCKIN EPSILONS IN MY HYPERREALS
.000000000000000000000000000000000000...1

Name: Pepe 2007-02-09 7:14

You do realize that you're gonna have to simplify the equation...

Loser...

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-09 7:50

the answer is 458932456,090764684534680754434567888765544343

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-09 16:46 (sage)

>>6
Is that supposed to be funny somehow?

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-10 0:51

>>7
the thread itself isn't funny

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-10 0:53

>>8

math is cool!

Name: Paul 2007-02-10 13:57

You fail to understand the basis of calculus.
You lose!  Good day sir!

Name: DoubleAW 2007-02-11 16:37

>>1

You fail at limits.

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-11 20:08

>>11
limits are imba imo
they should be removed to give other operations a chance. Like composition. Come on, who really uses composition? x.x

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-12 0:36

ROFL
looks like somebody needs to learn calculus
maybe ill teach you if you stop fucking MY DOG EVERY GODDAMN DAY MOTHERFUCKER
i know its you after i leave for work you snaek in my HOUSE NA FCUK HIM!

Name: Matt !#9xOeHH75cFXshTH 2007-02-12 13:45

That's a calculus problem (if you want plausible answers)

You used arithmetic to solve it. Therein lies your problem

What is the limit(x->4) of 1/(4-x)?
We can't evaluate it at 4, because it is asymtotic (I think, it's been a while), so we look to find out where exactly the hole is, and it ends up being infinity from the left, negative infinity from the right. Technically that means no limit exists, but it's the best problem I could come up with off the top of my head.

Name: sage !ccqXAQxUxI 2007-02-12 14:09 (sage)

>now let h = 0

Review definition of derivative.

Also sage

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-12 14:51

>>13
lolololololol I LOL

Name: Anonymous 2007-02-12 20:01

>>12
me.  all the time.  in mah mappings.

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List