Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Ask me any question about science.

Name: Mr. Science !/sdw8f7Aa6 2007-01-08 1:01

There is a high likely hood that you will be answerred.

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-08 1:11

what is science

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-08 2:28

/r/ human genome plz

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-08 3:51

psy-ants?

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-08 5:19

Saians? Are they still on Namek?

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-08 5:40

how many e's how many i's how many n's and how many c's in science?

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-08 8:49

2 OF EACH ZOMG

Name: Mr. Science !/sdw8f7Aa6 2007-01-08 9:57

>>2
An inherant element of prediction and knowledge is the noticing of properties of objects and the patterns that occur between them. Science is essentially the documentation, study and analysis of these patterns.

>>3
http://www.gdb.org/

>>5
If by "saian" you are referring to the Saiyans from the fictional Korean cartoon Dragon Ball Z, then they can neither be or not be on the fictional planet Namek.

>>6
There are 2 "e"s, 1 "i", 1 "n and 2 "c"s in "science".

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-08 13:10

>>8


Korean? You failed to answer correctly, end of thread.

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-08 16:38

Why are anthropologists always saying humans are all equal when clearly IQ tests say that black people are stupid?

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-08 17:37

>>10
not OP, but from a research standpoint, tests would be meaningless in this respect unless you could guarantee equal social influences from birth until the test

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-08 20:00

Why are anthropologists always saying humans are all equal when*,* clearly*,* IQ tests *show* that racists are stupid?

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-09 0:14

>>12

Saying that racists are different is funny.

Name: Mr. Science !/sdw8f7Aa6 2007-01-10 6:12

>>9
As I am human I did not guarantee that I would not make any mistakes. It is highly likely that all questions asked will be answerred and provide insights into the subject and many of these will be correct and useful. This is safe to assume.

>>10
This is an ambiguous statement. I would classify such anthropologists into 4 groups all of which believe the environment is an important factor and that differences in appearance caused by genes (black skin, white skin etc..) have had an effect on culture throughout history as a default.

Anthropologists who believe genetic difference between human demographic groups...

1: Affect performance strongly and thus affect the development of civilisation strongly.
2; Affect people medically in a significant manner due to population's resistance to local disease and traits evolved during the stone age, but the differences have little effect on performance.
3; Exist, but only affect people in minor medical instances such as a higher prevalence of allergies and that races are all equal in terms of performance, particularly intelligence.
4; Do not exist.

The mainstream view appears to be 2. Some theories leaning towards views 1 or 3 within their scope are considerred seriously with view 3 theories tending to be more popular than view 1 theories. Some fringe anthropologists hold a more universal approach to views 1 and 3, which in their totality are generally unnaccepted by the mainstream. View 4 is generally considerred absurd, but exists amongst anthropolgists who are more politically motivated than historically motivated.

IQ tests may be useful sources, but alone do not give any clear indication of the effects of genes on a demographic.

>11 is correct.

>>12
I believe I have coverred this issue already in my response to >>10. If you feel I have not done enough to answer your question please be more specific.

>>13
Dehumanising people for dehumanising is hypocritical. The answer is not to dehumanise them, but to use it as evidence to prove that they are ignorant and cannot be trusted with positions where ignorance is a vice.

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-10 13:01

Why will my head asplode?

Name: Mr. Science !/sdw8f7Aa6 2007-01-11 11:19

>>15
After consulting urbandictionary.com and finding that "asplode" translates to "explode" I would safely assume that your head will never explode.

However it is still physically possible for your head to explode, shockwaves from explosions, bullets or a sudden boiling of a sufficient amount of fluid in your head may cause your head to rapidly expand in a manner that could be described as an explosion.

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-11 12:55

Prove/Disprove to me that Astral Projection is a phenomenon that occurs entirely in the subject's mind

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-11 17:13

what can i do to make a project i had 1,5 year to do on lorentz law that i can do in 2 days and will be interesting
i have to write about 4000 words, not much but content needs to be  there since a "had 18 months of research"

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-11 17:35

>>17
Not the OP, but take the dumbassery elsewhere. No one has yet to show in any scientific manner that it is anything but a hallucination; therefore, no one need prove that it is not.

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-12 6:28

>>1
I have a question about antinoise (also known as Active noise control (ANC) noise cancellation,  or active noise reduction (ANR))

Can antinoise occur in nature? If so could you give me some examples of it?

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-12 15:13

>>20
Still not the OP. Hardware that does that inverts the wave 180º and plays that over the original, cancelling them. 'Antinoise' is not fundamentally different from 'noise'.

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-12 16:23

>>21

You sure answered the question there, boss.

Name: yo mama 2007-01-12 16:44

how is a black hole different from an Asshole

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-12 17:30

>>22
I think so. I explained what the thing he dubbed 'antinoise' actually is and why it's not a particularly difficult question to answer on his own in light of that.

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-12 18:02

>>24

Actually, I think he meant if a noise hit some sort of object would it automatically create antinoise.

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-12 18:52

>>25
That doesn't make any sense. Why would it?

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-12 19:14

>>26

I don't know, I didn't ask the question. Where's Mr. Science when you need him?

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-12 19:50

>>26
because theoretically bouncing off a perpendicular wall is like making the same sound from the opposite direction

thats not how noise cancelling works though, you have to line up crests and troughs of the wave, noise cancelling headphones technically send extra sound toward your ear, it just lines up with the sound outside in a way that cancels both.

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-13 2:19

Mr Science, you spelt SSCIIIEEEEEENNCNCCEEEEEEE wrong, but so did I, that's why I was asking you how many there were, I guess I'll have to ask VIPPER.

But while you're here, tell me about what happens to an area of space/time contained within a polygonal black hole field, with thin walls and shit, does the space inside fall out of sync with space/time around it, does it fall out of the universe forever?

Name: Mr. Science !JcP0OSZ5xQ 2007-01-15 22:00

HELO WELCOME TO MY WEB SIGHT

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-15 22:44

Dear Mr. Science,

If you cross two vectors, you get a new vector orthogonal to the plane created by the first two.  My question is:
A) Can vectors exist in the temporal dimension.
B) Is it possible to perform some kind of multiplication or addition of vectors that includes both the spatial and temporal dimensions?

Thanks,

Anonymous.

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-17 15:12

What would happen is superman entered a black hole?

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-17 21:30

>>32
He (should) die.

That entirely depends on how many drugs the writer's been smoking, though. It's entirely possible he's somehow live.

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-19 23:40

If I buy a hot dog for $2.98 and my friend buys another one just like it for $3.10 at another location how much of our life (in seconds) has been kike? (Given that porch monkey)

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-20 9:13

>>34
2 niggers and a beaner

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-20 11:33

>>35
HE SAID TO GIVE THE ANSWER IN PORCH MONKEYS YOU FOOL!!!

seven porch monkeys by the way

Name: Mr. Science !/sdw8f7Aa6 2007-01-20 13:47

>>17
There are many examples on the internet, but not all are trustworthy and the trustworthy accounts are purely sujective and often occur in conjunction with psychotropic drugs suggesting the experiences are due to hallucination. The subjective evidence for astral projection that there is does not suggest that specifically astral projection is occurring.

>>18
If you are already familiar with the lorentz law I would structure the essay around the equation and the timeline leading to the acceptance of the lorentz law. Starting with a brief on the lorentz law, leading from previous knowledge of electric and magnetic fields to how it was derived by Lorentz from his experiments and how it explained the generation of electromagnetic radiation.

>>19
Be specific.

>>20
"Anti-noise" is essentially destructive interference and this occurs frequently in nature. Though as sound usually expands spherically, it usually cannot be distinguished with the human ear from noise which echos indirectly. Some animals may utilise destructive interference as part of their vocal communication in order to create an easily recognised unusual set of sounds.

>>23
An asshole is the area between the sphincter of the anus and in fact does consist of material. The amount of matter in the asshole can range from a few milligrams of bodily fliuds to several grams of fecal matter or some other object. A black hole is structurally very different, it is a singularity bounded in our space-time by an event horizon. Black holes can theoretically contain any amount of mass and black holes containing the mass of elementary particles have been created in particle accelerators. These black holes were very unstable and did not exist for more than a few quantum seconds. Stable black holes contain substantially more mass than that which could be considerred part of the asshole.

>>29
There is no such thing as a black hole field and black holes are singularities, points in space, not polygons. If by field you are referring to the "volume" within the event horizon, then the answer is uncertain. Stephen Hawking postulated that matter and energy which enters the event horizon does eventually escape in the form of Hawking radiation and as a result of this slow loss of energy in 10^50 years the black hole will become unstable and collapse releasing the remaining energy. You may also be interested in black hole thermodynamics.

>>31
If you are using minkowski space in the scale in which special relativity applies, yes for both. From another vector with another direction it would be observed as a moving point in space and slowly changing relative velocity. Google "light cone".

>>32
If superman can travel so fast he can go back in time he must be able to generate more than infinite kinetic energy and would have the energy needed to exit the event horizon. Whether this means he could make contact with the singularity or exist in the event horizon is unknown.

>>34
My best estimate would be between 0.5 seconds and 5 minutes as this is the usual time it takes to purchase a hot dog to a reasonable extreme. If this is a trick question it could be anywhere between a quantum second and 150 years.

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-20 14:14

occulting

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-20 18:33

>>37
 >>18 here
Please elaborate
I've started it, but have no content lol
i'm so screwed

Name: Mr. Science !/sdw8f7Aa6 2007-01-22 13:57

>>39
I require a more specific question in order to elaborate. Copy paste what you have done so far. Are your 2 days up?

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List