>>9
As I am human I did not guarantee that I would not make any mistakes. It is highly likely that all questions asked will be answerred and provide insights into the subject and many of these will be correct and useful. This is safe to assume.
>>10
This is an ambiguous statement. I would classify such anthropologists into 4 groups all of which believe the environment is an important factor and that differences in appearance caused by genes (black skin, white skin etc..) have had an effect on culture throughout history as a default.
Anthropologists who believe genetic difference between human demographic groups...
1: Affect performance strongly and thus affect the development of civilisation strongly.
2; Affect people medically in a significant manner due to population's resistance to local disease and traits evolved during the stone age, but the differences have little effect on performance.
3; Exist, but only affect people in minor medical instances such as a higher prevalence of allergies and that races are all equal in terms of performance, particularly intelligence.
4; Do not exist.
The mainstream view appears to be 2. Some theories leaning towards views 1 or 3 within their scope are considerred seriously with view 3 theories tending to be more popular than view 1 theories. Some fringe anthropologists hold a more universal approach to views 1 and 3, which in their totality are generally unnaccepted by the mainstream. View 4 is generally considerred absurd, but exists amongst anthropolgists who are more politically motivated than historically motivated.
IQ tests may be useful sources, but alone do not give any clear indication of the effects of genes on a demographic.
>11 is correct.
>>12
I believe I have coverred this issue already in my response to
>>10. If you feel I have not done enough to answer your question please be more specific.
>>13
Dehumanising people for dehumanising is hypocritical. The answer is not to dehumanise them, but to use it as evidence to prove that they are ignorant and cannot be trusted with positions where ignorance is a vice.