They cannot comprehend the idea that some things they may never find an answer to.
For example.
How old is the earth? I don't know. All I can say is "there is evidence to suggest how old it is".
Religions aim to find people who are stupid enough to believe in things without evidence, so they claim to have the answers to such questions and when someone shows interest it means they are impressionable and can be used.
Name:
Anonymous2006-08-26 2:55
Protip human kind nearly 300,000
earth=3,650,000,000 years
universe=70,000,000,000 years*
Good created human as is own images and since humans has barely 300,000 years in the earth
The human god dosent exist and is not in any way the creator of the universe, earth or anything
Name:
Anonymous2006-08-26 3:09
>>1
So religion's prime flaw is that it is.... religion?
>>3
No religion's prime flaw is...
"They cannot comprehend the idea that some things they may never find an answer to."
Name:
Anonymous2006-08-26 16:04
>>6
That's a defeatist attitude. YOU ARE NOT FIT TO BE A SCIENTIST. GOOD DAY TO YOU.
Name:
Xel2006-08-26 16:37
If gay comes from nature, it is made from the devil and there is a cure. If it comes from nurture, then it's proof that gays were all raped by their parents and they'll continue the cycle because they can't have kids on their own. Nevermind that monogamous heterosexuality is the least common relationship in the animal kingdom or that if homosexuality is banned we may also ban all esthetical preferences such as liking wine or E Nomine.
Name:
Anonymous2006-08-27 21:13
>>7
Better than assuming something is true when it is not.
>>8
So men shouldn't have to pay their wives all their hard earned cash if they commit adultery?
Name:
Anonymous2006-08-31 23:30
I am gay, I am a nigger -- I am proud :')
Name:
Anonymous2006-09-01 1:35
>>2
So, you have come to these figures all by yourself?
Unless this theory has been proven in the last 400 years (it hasn't), you are making shit completely up.
Religion--Encouraging people to make their own decisions, but that decision better not be anything other than what the church tells you to do.
Name:
Anonymous2006-09-01 2:42
>>9
That statement didn't say anything about assuming. To me, it said to give up trying to understand something when it's too hard. Also, religious constructs, like mathematical constructs, can be fun!
Name:
Anonymous2006-09-01 7:08
>>12
Oh yes, haha, the religion of maths. MATHS IS A HUGE FRAUD 2+2=5!!
>>14
So you admit you believe maths is a religion?
Name:
Anonymous2006-09-03 19:05
>>15 >>16
You know, religious constructs like God and let's see God being a benevelent being or vengeful. God as a man in the sky versus God being everywhere. Or paradoxes like "How would God build something he can't destroy". I am not a theolegen, I think that's what it's called, so I don't know any more examples that are more interesting. Anyway it's fun shit and it has nothing to do with the real world, sort of like non-applied math.