Negro Anthropology

My political opinion is based on the facts which are used to develop utilitarian policies. I am also a meritocrat, so I do not discriminate based on race. I have been informed by a liberal that I should not look at anthropological facts involving the differences between different genetic groups of humans as I am subconsciously racist and will go out and commit hate crimes if I were to look at the facts. This illogical opinion was done with sincerity so I am sure that the liberal was not a troll. I believe it is the individual's responsibility to do his bit for ideas which are collective in nature so as a result I am going to take interest in anthropology and compile facts that liberals do not wish me to see as a form of resistance against extremism. This is my motivation, if liberals were not such ass wads I would be doing something else.

Observably negro skulls are much more different than caucasian and mongoloid skulls.

Sub-saharra Africa is barren of any archaeology until 1000 AD, whereas caucasians and mongoloids began to leave substantial evidence of civilisation during the bronze ages, even in central america which was completely cut off from the rest of the world which can be contrasted with africa which was influenced by arabs since early history.

The civilisations on the coast of the indian ocean and the Nile were all heavily influenced by the arabs and despite their substantial influence, civilisation never spread further than the arab trading posts and the Nile until around 1000 AD.

The out of Africa theory is correct and it means that the evolution of sub-saharran humans has remained closer to equilibrium than those humans who left africa who had a stronger impetus to evolve to the new environment. This is congruent with the scientific fact that the caucasian and mongoloid race are much more closely related to each other than either are related to negroes and their similiar skull shapes and cranial cavities.

While there are no sub-species (races) within humanity, there are wide genetic differences which are congruent between groups that are socially considerred to be races. And it has been genetically proven that mongoloids and caucasians have diverged from negroes by around 5000 generations, whilst asians and whites have diverged by 2000 generations from each other and of course had the impetus to evolve due to the new environments they were facing.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_and_multilocus_allele_clusters

So what exactly is your political opinion?

>>2
I'm assuming it's something about all the races not being equal due to evolution and genetics.

>>3
That's not really an opinion, nor is it really political.

I suppose I'm asking what he thinks should be done with that knowledge.

>>1 Sub-saharra Africa is barren of any archaeology until 1000 AD

Well this sentence alone is enough to sink your image of not making up bullshit. There is a wealth of Archeaological evidence dating back to almost 40,000 years ago. Weather it be the Australopythicus Afarensis, or the latter Homo sapiens. There is ample evidence of dwellings, flint tools and other tools of similar materials....lurk moar.

Also the mean Negroasian braincase is in fact almost identical to Caucasian and asian brains. Aside from the fact that a recent study by the University of Brisbane has found that Brain size has no correlation to IQ, the gene coding for brain size has no causal link to IQ either.

>>5
"There is ample evidence of dwellings, flint tools and other tools of similar materials"
People have been building rudimentary dwellings and using stone tools since the first humans evolved, I believe it was obvious that I was not referring to this primitive level of technology, but to things like this. Why did you intentionally ignore the fact that it is was obvious I was not talking about prehistoric archaeology?

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/88/Peru_Machu_Picchu_Sunset.jpg

The Incas lived in a comparable environment to that of Africa, except they built a complex civilisation whilst isolated from the rest of the world and during their bronze age.

"Also the mean Negroasian braincase is in fact almost identical to Caucasian and asian brains. Aside from the fact that a recent study by the University of Brisbane has found that Brain size has no correlation to IQ, the gene coding for brain size has no causal link to IQ either."
Correct, whales are not as intelligent as humans. Specifically the weight and size of the neo-cortex determines intelligence.

The neo-cortex is in the frontal lobe of the brain.

Negroes have sloped foreheads.

>>6
winn4r

>>6
Flawless victory.

Negroes do in fact have smaller (Actually almost the same size, just less dense (read weight) ) neo-cortex's. This in theory limits their ability to control actions (Read: Self-Control).

>>6
Specifically the weight and size of the neo-cortex determines intelligence.
Negroes have sloped foreheads.
I'll put 2 and 2 together that negroes have smaller neo-cortices and therefore less intelligence. References?

>>6

You moron,
         Do you even know what a neo cortex is. It is a layering of neurons (rougly 23% of total) and "grey matter" that covers the cerebrum. It is a part of the cerebral cortex...which is credited as having a causal link to intelligence, and the entire thinkness of the cerebral cortex (and thus the neo cortex) is approx 23 mm's but varies. This applies to all members of humanity. Having a sloped forehead refers to the slighlty lower mass of the FRONTAL LOBE, which is related to our emotions and actions, including hand eye co-ordination. The fact that a  negro might have a sloped forehead has nothing to do with theyre neo cortex, which in turn has nothing to do with theyre cerebral cortex.

Learn brain anatomy you idiot. Seriously you are one dumb fuck.

Also the idea that all negroes, or even a majority have sloped forheads is generalisitic and moronic.

>>8

The frontal lobe is causally linked to self control, not the neo cortices. Dont just make shit up on the net plz.

>>10
what the flaming fuck are you talking about?  The frontal lobe is linked to forethought and planning out the future.  You think the frontal lobe is related to emotions? You've got it confused with the limbic system.  Looks like your nigger education didn't pull through.

>>10
14 year old nigger making up words.

Like...
|with theyre cerebral cortex.
and
|neo cortices.


You must be a great science man, with your lack of grammar or spelling. Moron.

hay guys stop being racist lol and lets do this scientifically

>>12
Definition cortex  
noun [C] plural cortices

>>12
Ignorant red kneck yelling at niggers for what he see's as a spelling mistake...even though he never went to school and doesnt know how to spell...get out of my /sci/.....thats right i own it....my names al gore!

>>15
gb2 canada

>>10
Your knowledge of the neo-cortex is encyclopedic.

Since the neo-cortex fills up the area beneath the forehead and the front-top of the skull, a smaller neo-cortex would mean a sloped frontal lobe.

Like teeth and other bones, the skull shape is not genetic and is influenced by the growth of the brain. This would mean that unless a child has had boards tightly strapped to their heads for the majority of their infancy their skull shape represents the growth and shape of the brain.

Humans have a massive neo-cortex compared to animals, this means that the neo-cortex is not as vital for the functionning of the body as other regions of the frontal lobe. Thus a smaller frontal lobe implies either a serious deformity or a smaller neo-cortex.

The amygdala is next to the neo-cortex and is the part of the brain which involves emotions. The neo-cortex was originally part of the amygdala which is the major decision making part of the brain in lizards.

>>14
"The frontal lobe is causally linked to self control, not the neo cortices. Dont just make shit up on the net plz."

The poster overlooked the fact that the neo-cortex is part of the frontal lobe. This implies a poor understanding of the terminology used to describe the structure of the brain.

>>12
>>15
Your bigotry implies you have nothing to do with my beliefs and are attempting to inflame and embaress my cause of eliminating the galileo effect concerning negro anthropology that exists in society.

>>8
Back up your hypothesis with facts. For the sake of forcing critics to address the facts it is often better not to compose a hypothesis.

>>19

Although i disagree with your idea (if you are the op), i do agree with the fact that you have sought to present them in a semi-objective way. This is the one shining example among alot of other racist tripe...i can accept you idea's but you must have evidence. i personally favour the research that shows that although race is linked to a difference in IQ, it is usually environmental factors that can be attributed to this ie. nutrition.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_and_IQ

gay and fake

gay and fake

>>18
oops, I meant frontal lobes are part of the neo cortex (Latin new bark, evolutionarily the neo cortex is more recent than other parts e.g. limbic system or "reptillian brain")

Nigga wut?!

[b][u]MP