0=1=∞

this is an interesting one, and i know its not correct but it still interesting

i hope the ∞ turns out ok, had to go to the bloody character map to get it

greatest post ever

signed

lol what

what is this faggotry. if you're going to try to start a number theory debate at least do it right

mathematical induction is crying

I thought asians were good at math, I guess they are only good at improving on other people's ideas. The entire of asian culture is derived from Hinduism, they have created nothing of their own! Perhaps they should all be killed, or just the japanese since they are the only ones without souls and that would be more humane. However Japanese are the only asians who don't suck.

Tricky.

What's the solution 4 chan?

If you want to turn this into a philosophical debate, you could use the Zen meditation on the idea that even nothing is something, and that everything is something. That's fun, but it has no place in /sci/.

I studied set theory and recursion a few semesters ago. Correct me if I'm wrong, anyone. Here is what I remember of using recursion to define the natural numbers in terms of set definitions. Using @ as null-set symbol), and using the Generator function n+1 = {n}, I get:
0 = @ (as explicitly defined. Zero is null.)
1 = {0} (using Generator defined as n+1 = {n}
2 = {1} = {{0}}
... und so weiter.

So then, to restate what the OP said, using the integers' representations:
0 = {0} = {...{0}...}

This is wrong. x =/= {x}. Watch those brackets, they're tricky.

niggers

jews

kikes

>>7

The solution is your death. You know too much.

>>12
The post you replied to is over two years old.

>>13
The post you replied to is over three hours old.