I CHALLENGE YOU!

prove to me that 1>0

Consider 1 = 0 + 1
Thus 1 > 0

>>2
when you sum 0+1 and say that it is =1 you are already considering that 1>0
fail

>>1
i challange you to prove otherwise...

>>4
same thing to saying god exists because you cant prove otherwise
fail

…………….\llllllllllll,-~*…………………)_-\..*`*;..)…………………….
……………..\,-*`¯,*`)…………,-~*`~.………….../……………………..
……………...|/.../…/~,…...-~*,-~*`;……………./.\……………………..
……………../.../…/…/..,-,..*~,.`*~*…………….*...\……………………
…………….|.../…/…/.*`...\...……………………)….)¯`~,……………...
…………….|./…/…./…….)……,.)`*~-,……….../….|..)…`~-,………….

. . . . . . . . /,-',' :: : : : : : : : : :: :: :: : '-, ;; ;; ;; ;; ;; ;;|
. . . . . . . /,',-' :: :: :: :: :: :: :: : ::_,-~~,_'-, ;; ;; ;; ;; |
. . . . . _/ :,' :/ :: :: :: : : :: :: _,-'/ : ,-';'-'''''~-, ;; ;; ;;,'
. . . ,-' / : : : : : : ,-''' : : :,--'' :|| /,-'-'--'''__,''' \ ;; ;,-' /
. . . \ :/,, : : : _,-' --,,_ : : \ :\ ||/ /,-'-'x### ::\ \ ;;/
. . . . \/ /---'''' : \ #\ : :\ : : \ :\ \| | : (O##º : :/ /-''
. . . . /,'____ : :\ '-#\ : \, : :\ :\ \ \ : '-,___,-',-`-,,
. . . . ' ) : : : :''''--,,--,,,,,,¯ \ \ :: ::--,,_''-,,'''¯ :'- :'-,
. . . . .) : : : : : : ,, : ''''~~~~' \ :: :: :: :'''''¯ :: ,-' :,/\
. . . . .\,/ /|\\| | :/ / : : : : : : : ,'-, :: :: :: :: ::,--'' :,-' \ \
. . . . .\\'|\\ \|/ '/ / :: :_--,, : , | )'; :: :: :: :,-'' : ,-' : : :\ \,

Fap fap fap

>>3
wrong,
1 = 0 + 1 assumes nothing about 1 being greater or less than 0
a = b + a
0 = b
a could be anything.  i.e. -2 + 0 = -2, -2 is not greater than 0
but the argument does fail if 1 doesn't have to be positive, which is what the proof is attempting.

but 1 is the smallest positive integer, so it is > 0 by definition.

http://au.metamath.org/mpegif/lt01.html

Now SHUT UP.

>>10
someone translate that please

>>11
Huh in English like this?
Step 1 - 1 does not equal 0.
Step 2 - 1 does not equal 0 if and only if not 1 equals 0.
Step 3 - Using Step 1 and Step 2, not 1 equals 0.
Step 4 - 1 is an element of the real number set.
Step 5 - Using Step 4, not 1 equals 0 implies 0 is less than 1 multiplied by 1.
Step 6 - Using Step 3 and Step 5, 0 is less than 1 multiplied by 1.
Step 7 - 1 is an element of the complex number set.
Step 8 - Using Step 7, 1 multiplied by 1 equals 1
Step 9 - Using Step 6 and Step 8, 0 is less than 1

The proof is rather simple.  Originally when I saw the problem I thought that you would go to go back to logical definitions of the natural number set and the ordering operator, potentially messy.

didnt get it... why not 1 equals 0 implies that 0 is less than 1x1?

>>13
See link:
http://au.metamath.org/mpegif/msqgt0.html

Haha dumbasses, mathematics is simply a model of real life occurances. 1 > 0 is something that has to be observed to be understood, or it is an "a posteriori" concept in unneccesarily complex speak.

1 > 0 is all about axi-oms,

what aboot 24623572457^468 being bigger than 0,000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001 then?

probably a consequence of 1 being greater than 0

What is the smallest positive number

0={} is contained in 1={{}}, but {{}} is not contained in {} therefore 0<1. qed.

0 = |{}| = |{{}}|

0 = |{0 = |{}| = |{{0 = |{}| = |{{}}|}}|}| = |{{0 = |{}| = |{{}}|}}|

Hai guys is this a regular expression?

>>23
Fails at set theory.

>>21
genuine question here, is |{{}}| actually 0, or 1?

>>25
I'd say it's 1.

>>25
1

>>25
What the hell does |{{}}| mean anyway?  I assume || defines a set, and not the absolute value of something... but what are the {{}}?

{} is set, || cardinality. probably. who knows what these deluded freaks come up wth.

Oh, in that case it is 1. (I think I actually learned this in school once!)

>>23

I lawl'd