no neutrino emission has come out of cold fusion ever. What's much more likely to be possible is sonicular fusion which is tricky as shit and seems to possibly show signs of neutrino emission.(one of the signs of fusion occuring)
Name:
Anonymous2006-05-01 13:57
Is there some metyhods to meshure small amounts of neutrinos?
Or did you mean neutrons?
Name:
Anonymous2006-05-01 17:02
Fuck cold fusion (for the time being). We're closer to making fusion possible through heat, in fact we've already created temperatures of 15 billion degrees Kelvin-and only 10 billion is needed to perform nuclear fusion.
Name:
Anonymous2006-05-01 19:43
there has been microfusion found in superheated gas of some sort.
Name:
Anonymous2006-05-07 3:42 (sage)
>>4
Do you know what neutrinos are? Yes, we can measure small amounts, even though there are trillions passing through the earth at any given moment -- but we things like a 50,000 tone Cherenkov water detector to even see a few.
Name:
Anonymous2006-05-08 22:14
haha. >>1 comes in trying to make a joke topic, and people are educated on the shit.
Name:
Anonymous2006-05-08 22:17
>>7
my university has a neutrino detector that is a 2 to 3 square meters wide. it detects about 20 neutrinos daily.
Name:
Anonymous2006-05-11 14:41
I was going to troll this thread with something stupid but I'll abstain from it, it's fine enough and people actually know what they're saying.
Name:
Anonymous2006-05-11 16:17
we've had fusion for years. the problem is that it doesn't break-even.
Name:
Anonymous2006-05-11 18:29
We need to a paradigm shift. Fusion 2.0 will scale to our needs through producing electricity in XML format.