>>7
I'm sorry but I'm just going to save you loads of trouble by saying..
It's no use arguing that here.
There are three type of people here, on this particular board:
A) Failed mathematicians who need to rely on their e-cock not to kill themselves.
B) People who come here to laugh at A.
C) Mindless Trolls.
Note that A are usually C as well. So my advice is to just stop sitting on the fence, join group B, and laugh at >>6 who is C, and >>2 who is blatantly A.
Name:
Anonymous2006-03-02 10:22 (sage)
>>7
So, you are fat. I feel for you, it is a sad fact that intelligence is inversely proportional to body fat.
As for different types of smart, there sure are. I wouldn't even know where to start if I wanted to get fat... I am quite sure my genes would burn any excess fat though.
Name:
Anonymous2006-03-02 10:23 (sage)
>>9
Actually, two of the leading british NLP researchers aren't exactly thin, but they're pretty damn smart. Fail.
>>11
lolol did you forget that USA came behind Korea and most of the other European countries and Britain in that test which is reposted in /b/ all the time? Enjoy your obesity and heart failure stupid american pig.