Name: Anonymous 2005-09-02 13:58
What if aspects of society were routinly filmed and monitored, and then footage was reviewed to evaluate effectiveness, corruption, or other aspects of a given system. For example, high school classrooms, employment, board room meetings, etc. It wouldn't be in a majority of organizations, just a small sample like 1-2%. Not enough to be big brother, but enough to measure the effectiveness of an organization, rate it, and improve it or look for what it's doing wrong.
How could such a system work effectively, if it were ok'd by the government? If the subject is aware they are being monitored, they will obviously try to meet some standard rather than act natural. Think of it like National Geographic, where the subject isn't fully aware, rather than The Real World where the subject knows cameras are everywhere. Of course, you wouldn't be able to capture everything.
How could such a system work effectively, if it were ok'd by the government? If the subject is aware they are being monitored, they will obviously try to meet some standard rather than act natural. Think of it like National Geographic, where the subject isn't fully aware, rather than The Real World where the subject knows cameras are everywhere. Of course, you wouldn't be able to capture everything.