Isn't "scientific socialism" a little like "military intelligence" or "jumbo shrimp?"
Name:
Artificialist2005-01-18 22:29
I read so many posts all over the net about Scientific people backing socialism.
Here is a thought, you guys: Things don't always happen as planned. When a socialist wants to end the class warfare, he instead creates two classes, separated by a huge divide. Government and gov't aids have most of the stuff, and all the people who can't get along with the gov't have a tiny share of resources.
I'm a realist. I understand that shit just gets fucked up sometimes.
Name:
Artificialist2005-01-18 22:30
I read so many posts all over the net about Scientific people backing socialism.
Here is a thought, you guys: Things don't always happen as planned. When a socialist wants to end the class warfare, he instead creates two classes, separated by a huge divide. Government and gov't aids have most of the stuff, and all the people who can't get along with the gov't have a tiny share of resources.
I'm a realist. I understand that shit just gets fucked up sometimes.
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-21 0:49
dicks
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-22 19:35
Scientific socialism isn't "scientific" people backing socialism. It is more like taking "Socialism works" as a hypothesis and use the scientific method with it. That is, taking data on experiments with socialism.
Name:
Anonymous2007-01-23 19:12
>>8
So it's just like "Intelligent Design" as it is a bunch of idiots incorrectly applying the scientific method?