Moon hoax conspiricies

Why do people keep falling for this nonsense?  Every argument the hoaxers can come up with has been soundly blown out of the water, yet thousands of people still buy all the books and videos and what not.  In the end the more fanatical ones can only resort to arguments that God wouldn't allow us up there and He would smite us down loke the Tower of Babel.  Come on. Is this really the best you can do?

i watched one of those videos

besides all those image analyses measuring shadows and whatnot..
they claim there is a belt of radiation that would nuke humans pretty bad... did any of those astonauts get cancer? i dont know actually

http://spider.ipac.caltech.edu/staff/waw/mad/mad19.html
is well researched... and in my mind the only possible hard evidence against the moon landings(all moon landings)

some say only the first landing was faked for national interest reasons and time constraints... they achieved low earth orbit and then played some trick with the camera to make the earth look further away

too many conspiracy nuts in this space to get a straight bead on the reality of the issue....

telescope at the moon, find the flag

proof incontrovertible

>>2 In spite of what the hoaxers say, the Apollo spacecraft did have radiation shielding, it was some kind of fiberous substance like loft insulation material.  The hoaxers seem to think that lead is the only viable radiation shield but you only really need lead shielding when dealing with intense gamma radiation.  Alpha and Beta sources are blocked more easily (in fact a 6 cm thickness of air is enough for alpha usually). 

Jack Swigart, Apollo 13 CMP died of leukemia so at least one Apollo astronaut did contract cancer.  I don't know if this is just chance or if it's down to the radiation dose he took during his flight (Even with shielding the astronauts would have taken a radiation dose.  Nobody pretended landing on the moon would be risk free). 

3>> The flag would be just a pole and some nylon ash by now.  The unfiltered UV light from the sun would have crumbled the flag to dusk years ago.  Besides, there's no telescope that could resolve an object that small from so far away.

once a 25meter optical telescope is built, we will be able to identify the lunar lander on the surface of the moon

that will be the only way to convince the conspiracists

The hard conspirists are unconvincible.  They'll just go "ZMOG its a lam3 fotoshop job!".  They're never gonna say "Oh, yeah, you're right. Sorry".  All that lovely income they get from the books and videos will dry up.

I believe there to be people who finace these sort of conspiracies for a purpose. My example is Area 51, widely regarded by conspiracy nuts as UFO crash site, when it is quite obviously a military testing ground. Their opinions are manipulated just as much as anyone who believes the mainstream media.

FLOOD

WE LANDED ON DA MOON YEAH MRN