WHILE IT'S IMPORTANT 2 NOTE DAT CHAR_BIT==8 AINT REQUIRED BY DA STANDARD, IT AINT NECESSARILY UNPORTABLE EITHER. ONLY DIRTY OLD JOSEPH DA UNIX HACKER USES SHIT FOR WHICH DAT, AND OTHER REASONABLY PORTABLE ASSUMPTIONS LIKE ASCII, R FALSE.
WITH DAT SAID, IN GENERAL U SHUD STICK WITH DA STANDARD WHEREVER POSSIBLE. IN SITUATIONS LIKE DATA SERIALISATION DEY TEND TO BE GOOD ASSUMPTIONS, BUT IN DA SITUATION PRESENTED BY
>>29 DEY AINT, AND DATS COZ
>>29 IS A FUKIN STAK BOI.
IN DIS SITUATION, unsigned char, IS DA APPROPRIATE TYPE, EVEN IF CHAR_BIT!=8. THOUGH U SHUD PROBABLY CHUCK IT IN A union WITH AN OBJECT DAT HAS DA STRICTEST ALIGNMENT REQUIREMENTS, IF U WANT TO STORE LARGER SCALARS. 8.7 OF K&R2 4 MORE INFORMATION.
>>24
NO CHALLENGES 2DAY. IM ON VACATION FROM HAVING 2 BABYSIT ALL U RETOIDS
>>26
UR A BIT OF A HERMIT CRAB ARENT U?
>>27,28
WHY DA FUK WUD DEY CALL IT A "REGULAR EXPRESSION EINGINE" IF DEY'VE EXTENDED IT TO HANDLE CONTEXT-FREE GRAMMARS? DATS WAT I WANNA KNO. I BLAME DA FUCKIN BUSINESS BOIZ WHO WONT USE SOMETHING UNLESS IT'S ASSOCIATED WITH A FUCKIN BUZZWORD LIKE "REGEX".