Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

Is SICP actually a good book?

Name: Anonymous 2014-03-27 3:05

Or are you being ironic?

Name: Anonymous 2014-03-27 4:41

pknsytall NES/Jentoo

Name: Anonymous 2014-03-27 4:41

toacp

Name: Anonymous 2014-03-27 11:52

sicp is great

Name: Anonymous 2014-03-27 14:41

I tried reading it but got stuck because of the exercises
Shits pretty hard

Name: Anonymous 2014-03-27 15:08

It's a good book, but unless you're pretty decent at math you might not get a lot of what it's in it because most of the examples and exercises are math.

Name: Anonymous 2014-03-27 15:17

>>6
And where can I learn math?

Name: Anonymous 2014-03-27 16:02

|  BλNK OF SICP
|
|      >>Abel-san why is my balance zero? It was just...
|∧,,∧
|´・ω・)     ∧__∧
|o旦o     (´・ω・)   >>Sussman you fool. Is user's temporal existence that
|―u'     .(っ/ ̄($) ̄ ̄/   imposes balance on the account. Is not 0. Is stream!
       (´\/______/ )
       [i=========i]

Name: Anonymous 2014-03-27 16:03

>>7
From doing the exercises in SICP

Name: Anonymous 2014-03-27 19:26

                                   `
>2014
>reading SICP

Name: Anonymous 2014-03-27 20:54

>>10
how u do greentext

Name: Anonymous 2014-03-27 21:49

>>11
#rect

Name: Anonymous 2014-03-28 1:18

READ - SICP CH.5 BBCODE.

Name: Anonymous 2014-03-28 12:48

>>13

(define (expert x)
  (and (bold x)
       (italic x)
       (underline x)
       (overline x)))

(display (expert "Is this Satori?"))


Is this Satori?

Name: Anonymous 2014-03-28 13:15

>>14
LISP
(define (expert x)
  (and (bold x)
       (italic x)
       (underline x)
       (overline x)))

(display (expert "Is this Satori?"))


Haskell
main :: IO ()
main = putStrLn . expert $ "Is this Satori?"
  where expert = bold . italic . underline . overline

Name: Anonymous 2014-03-28 13:20

>>15
The two code fragments are not equivalent. Please try again.

Name: Anonymous 2014-03-28 13:52

Is SICP actually a good book?
I've read SICP, and it looks like a good beginner book. Although you can skip SICP, if you already got through writing a Scheme compiler and understand how lazy evaluation, continuation passing and monads work.

Name: Anonymous 2014-03-28 13:57

>>17
I would also recommend TAPL and ATAPL, because it introduces unification algorithm and provides a lot of type modeling examples. Sometimes is a good idea to model your domain with types.

Name: Anonymous 2014-03-28 14:07

>>15-16
even if they were equal the haskal one seems horrible

Name: Anonymous 2014-03-28 15:32

>>16
suuuck my diiick

Name: Anonymous 2014-03-28 17:51

>>20
Gimme!

Name: Anonymous 2014-03-28 19:26

>>21
*whips out cock*

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List