Retards have no place to go on the Internet. They are everywhere mocked and oppressed. 4chan used to be that haven where they were allowed to socialize with their kins.
Fuck you, PhD faggots. You have access to paywalled networks and repositories we couldn't dream to have a glance at. You have dozens of high-quality communication channels at your disposal where you can have the most exquisite and exclusive discussions about PhD things with your peers.
But no, you use all those PhDs you have to post in a shithole and bully the retarded residents just to feel better about yourselves. Fuck you.
Don't say that.
As both Luke's biggest fan and biggest hater I'd like him to stay.
Name:
Anonymous2014-01-09 22:37
>>2
Sometimes we want to slum it with the normal folk.
Go to the zoo and point and monkies as it were.
Being part of the PhD illuminati isn't as cushy and fun as it seems to outsiders.
You know once a dirty non-PhD-holder actually had the audacity to use the same elevator as me.
I ofcourse set her straight and pointed out all her flaws until she burst into tears and her mother took her away.
1.
a thing consisting of a number of different and distinct parts or items that are grouped together.
"the Earth is a specialized conglomerate of organisms"
synonyms: mixture, mix, combination, mingling, commingling, amalgamation, amalgam, union, conjunction, marriage, merging, compound, alloy, fusion, meld, composite, concoction, synthesis, homogenization;
miscellany, jumble, hotchpotch;
informalmash-up
where is the real luke?
guise can we have a luke thread going on please?
Name:
Anonymous2014-01-10 0:05
If they used subliminal programming on enemies in iraq... would they stop at enemies in congress?
Name:
Anonymous2014-01-10 0:09
luke can you send me some grass pls :))))))
Name:
Anonymous2014-01-10 0:09
Who's going to know? ^^
Name:
Anonymous2014-01-10 0:12
first thing i thought when obama organized a private meeting with all the NSA's opposition...
ready for them all to start endorsing 'National Security'?
Name:
Anonymous2014-01-10 0:15
second thing i thought when obama organized a private meeting with all the NSA's opposition...
they were murdered and replaced with brainwashed clones
Name:
Anonymous2014-01-10 0:16
Compromise or just Compromised?
Name:
Anonymous2014-01-10 0:20
or even... Comprised?
Name:
Anonymous2014-01-10 0:22
luke do u wanna meet me on irc
Name:
Anonymous2014-01-10 0:26
Has the meeting already happened? oh yep... it's too late for them to cancel the operation now.. ^^
Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., a prominent critic of current NSA surveillance policies, said after the meeting that it's clear Obama and his aides "are wrestling with the serious issues surrounding the disclosures of the last six months." ?
You mean like snowden being exiled?
Name:
Anonymous2014-01-10 0:26
luke do u wanna meet me on irc?????????
Name:
Anonymous2014-01-10 0:27
>>28
Luke, I'm reasonably sure this man wants to take your innocence from you.
If you do decide to IRC with him make sure to connect via Tor and don't tell him your name or where you live.
Name:
Anonymous2014-01-10 0:34
Why not say Obama is "wrestling with the serious issues surrounding the surveillance policies of the last decade" ?
Is there really an issue with the disclosures?
Name:
Anonymous2014-01-10 0:37
i'm right here, speak if you want...
it's not like anywhere else is going to be any more private ^^
Name:
Anonymous2014-01-10 0:41
Washington, DC
Friday 12:00 am
Overcast
1 Degree Celcius ^^
Name:
Anonymous2014-01-10 0:42
I'm happy for you, because you like being cold, no?
Name:
Anonymous2014-01-10 0:53
Look at how warmly you speak of 'foreigners'...
It's a wonder they didn't call us 'aliens'... yet who is invading?
Name:
Anonymous2014-01-10 0:56
Planet America (aka Pluto) wants it's frozen heart back
Name:
Anonymous2014-01-10 0:56
>>36
No, Luke. No.
Don't go /pol/ on me. Don't start bitching about foreigners.
Stay in /prog/ and /x/ territory.
Name:
Anonymous2014-01-10 1:10
Aww... but that's the whole point.. =D
What is these NSA foreigners problem with foreigners? ^^
Hypocritical? No, because i'd quite like them if they'd keep their 'dirty foreigner' hands to themselves...
Name:
Anonymous2014-01-10 1:18
99.9% of foreigners can manage it... actually there's barely a need to manage it, it's the default state...
just a few people of the few shittiest nations have managed not to... And now you know your place..
Name:
Anonymous2014-01-10 1:26
Isn't that what 'National Security' is?
Not having to worry about 'foreigners'?
I'm just defending mine ^^ like all terrorists
Name:
Anonymous2014-01-10 1:29
What can you do, i'm non-violent at least =D
Name:
Anonymous2014-01-10 1:38
how many foreigners have you killed this year america?
Name:
Anonymous2014-01-10 2:44
Lets hold a foreigner referendum, to decide how much authority NSA has over us?
Mind your own affairs demon ^^
Name:
Anonymous2014-01-10 2:48
What use could you be here in not-america?
Name:
Anonymous2014-01-10 2:53
Planet not-america even?
Necessary and Proportionate? =)
Name:
Anonymous2014-01-10 2:57
You will be evicted, squatter!
Name:
Anonymous2014-01-10 3:02
Be grateful it was only seven days of ice ^^
I would've gone with fire
Name:
Anonymous2014-01-10 3:05
but i suppose it is only winter =D
Name:
Anonymous2014-01-10 4:37
>>2 have the most exquisite and exclusive discussions about PhD things with your peers.
I have a PhD in internet shitposting from an online diploma mill.
/prog/riders are my peers.
Even after the developers of THINTHREAD left NSA in October 2001, I kept trying to get it authorized to go operational – in vain. However, I was able to acquire enough funding to complete a THINTHREAD Content Evaluation of NSA databases that contained huge amounts of collected data.
Pre-9/11 Intelligence
“That’s where I found the pre- and post-9/11 intelligence from NSA monitoring of some of the hijackers as they planned the attacks of 9/11 had not been shared outside NSA. This includes critical pre-9/11 intelligence on al-Qaeda, even though it had been worked on by NSA analysts. I learned, for example, that in early 2001 NSA had produced a critical long-term analytic report unraveling the entire heart of al-Qaeda and associated movements. That report also was not disseminated outside of NSA.
“Make no mistake. That data and the analytic report could have, should have prevented 9/11.
“Top NSA management knew that. They knew that I knew that. I was immediately shut down. In spring 2002, the remnants of THINTHREAD were unceremoniously put on the shelf in NSA’s ‘Indiana Jones’ data warehouse, never to be seen again.
Cover-up
“Hiding the worst: In December 2001, Senator Saxby Chambliss, chair of a House Subcommittee on Homeland Security announced a preliminary investigation into 9/11. At a SIGINT Leadership Team meeting in February 2002, SIGINT chief Maureen Baginski directed me to lead a NSA Statement-for-the-Record effort for a closed-door hearing scheduled by Sen. Chambliss for early March to discuss what NSA knew about the 9/11 hijackers and their plotting before 9/11.
As indicated above, the highly embarrassing answer was that NSA knew a great deal, but had not shared what it knew outside of NSA.
“After a couple of weeks Baginski rejected my draft team Statement for the Record report and removed me from the task. When I asked her why, she said there was a ‘data integrity problem’ (not further explained) with my draft Statement for the Record. I had come upon additional damaging revelations. For example, NSA had the content of telephone calls between AA-77 hijacker Khalid al-Mihdhar in San Diego, CA, and the known al-Qaeda safe house switchboard in Yemen well before 9/11, and had not disseminated that information beyond NSA.
“In short, when confronted with the prospect of fessing up, NSA chose instead to obstruct the 9/11 congressional investigation, play dumb, and keep the truth buried, including the fact that it knew about all inbound and outbound calls to the safe house switchboard in Yemen. NSA’s senior leaders took me off the task because they realized – belatedly, for some reason – that I would not take part in covering up the truth about how much NSA knew but did not share.
“When the 9/11 Commission hearings began, Director Hayden chortled at executive staff meetings over the fact that the FBI and CIA were feeling the heat for not having prevented 9/11. This was particularly difficult for me to sit through, for I was aware that NSA had been able to cover up its own culpability by keeping investigators, committees, and commissions away from the truth.
Name:
Anonymous2014-01-10 23:31
Why would the NSA stop 9/11?
Their top priority is getting more funding so they can buy more spying tools.
9/11 was payday for them.
Name:
s Fated Chance2014-01-11 0:08
I think we're done here...
Name:
Anonymous2014-01-11 0:18
I thought i saw hope with obama promising 1974 privacy protections for foreigners...
You couldn't save yourselves in 2001, why would 2014 be different..?
Name:
Anonymous2014-01-11 0:52
luke meet me on irc pls
Name:
Anonymous2014-01-11 5:02
Maybe this will be the american civil war people have been talking about..?
All this crying about Al Qaeda, and you are just as guilty as they are?
Killing your own people for national security purposes..
And then broadcast it around the globe?
Such proud murderers you have for a government..
Name:
Anonymous2014-01-11 22:12
Or maybe... maybe you're not killing your own people at all.
Maybe the US government really is populated by lizard people
Name:
Anonymous2014-01-12 3:40
lol, cold-blooded certainly..
I guess they found a new way to make money out of war...
I think it's fair to suspect anyone who uses the 'National Security' Defense as Utterly Corrupt. What other purpose does it serve?
Name:
Anonymous2014-01-12 3:46
>>61
To give politicians a way of saying "look at all this great protection I've given you! I've saved all your lives a thousand times over!" without having to provide any actual proof of anything, since that would be revealing state secrets and therefore treason.
Name:
Anonymous2014-01-12 15:47
>>60 Or maybe... maybe you're not killing your own people at all. Maybe the US government really is populated by lizard people
Or maybe it was real people killing lizard people working in WTC. Think about it.
That the individual shall have full protection in person and in property is a principle as old as the common law; but it has been found necessary from time to time to define anew the exact nature and extent of such protection. Political, social, and economic changes entail the recognition of new rights, and the common law, in its eternal youth, grows to meet the new demands of society. Thus, in very early times, the law gave a remedy only for physical interference with life and property, for trespasses vi et armis. Then the "right to life" served only to protect the subject from battery in its various forms; liberty meant freedom from actual restraint; and the right to property secured to the individual his lands and his cattle. Later, there came a recognition of man's spiritual nature, of his feelings and his intellect. Gradually the scope of these legal rights broadened; and now the right to life has come to mean the right to enjoy life, -- the right to be let alone; the right to liberty secures the exercise of extensive civil privileges; and the term "property" has grown to comprise every form of possession -- intangible, as well as tangible.
Name:
Anonymous2014-01-12 20:06
... Recent inventions and business methods call attention to the next step which must be taken for the protection of the person, and for securing to the individual what Judge Cooley calls the right "to be let alone" [10] Instantaneous photographs and newspaper enterprise have invaded the sacred precincts of private and domestic life; and numerous mechanical devices threaten to make good the prediction that "what is whispered in the closet shall be proclaimed from the house-tops." For years there has been a feeling that the law must afford some remedy for the unauthorized circulation of portraits of private persons;[11] and the evil of invasion of privacy by the newspapers, long keenly felt, has been but recently discussed by an able writer.[12] The alleged facts of a somewhat notorious case brought before an inferior tribunal in New York a few months ago,[13] directly involved the consideration of the right of circulating portraits; and the question whether our law will recognize and protect the right to privacy in this and in other respects must soon come before our courts for consideration.
Name:
Anonymous2014-01-12 20:10
The common law secures to each individual the right of determining, ordinarily, to what extent his thoughts, sentiments, and emotions shall be communicated to others.[16] Under our system of government, he can never be compelled to express them (except when upon the witness stand); and even if he has chosen to give them expression, he generally retains the power to fix the limits of the publicity which shall be given them. The existence of this right does not depend upon the particular method of expression adopted. It is immaterial whether it be by word[17] or by signs,[18] in painting,[19] by sculpture, or in music.[20] Neither does the existence of the right depend upon the nature or value of the thought or emotions, nor upon the excellence of the means of expression.[21] The same protection is accorded to a casual letter or an entry in a diary and to the most valuable poem or essay, to a botch or daub and to a masterpiece. In every such case the individual is entitled to decide whether that which is his shall be given to the public.[22] No other has the right to publish his productions in any form, without his consent. This right is wholly independent of the material on which, the thought, sentiment, or emotions is expressed. It may exist independently of any corporeal being, as in words spoken, a song sung, a drama acted. Or if expressed on any material, as in a poem in writing, the author may have parted with the paper, without forfeiting any proprietary right in the composition itself. The right is lost only when the author himself communicates his production to the public, -- in other words, publishes it.[23] It is entirely independent of the copyright laws, and their extension into the domain of art. The aim of those statutes is to secure to the author, composer, or artist the entire profits arising from publication; but the common-law protection enables him to control absolutely the act of publication, and in the exercise of his own discretion, to decide whether there shall be any publication at all.[24] The statutory right is of no value, unless there is a publication; the common-law right is lost as soon as there is a publication.
Name:
Anonymous2014-01-12 20:25
1. The right to privacy does not prohibit any publication of matter which is of public or general interest. In determining the scope of this rule, aid would be afforded by the analogy, in the law of libel and slander, of cases which deal with the qualified privilege of comment and criticism on matters of public and general interest.[42] There are of course difficulties in applying such a rule; but they are inherent in the subject-matter, and are certainly no greater than those which exist in many other branches of the law, -- for instance, in that large class of cases in which the reasonableness or unreasonableness of an act is made the test of liability. The design of the law must be to protect those persons with whose affairs the community has no legitimate concern, from being dragged into an undesirable and undesired publicity and to protect all persons, whatsoever; their position or station, from having matters which they may properly prefer to keep private, made public against their will.
Name:
Anonymous2014-01-12 20:31
This development of the law was inevitable. The intense intellectual and emotional life, and the heightening of sensations which came with the advance of civilization, made it clear to men that only a part of the pain, pleasure, and profit of life lay in physical things. Thoughts, emotions, and sensations demanded legal recognition, and the beautiful capacity for growth which characterizes the common law enabled the judges to afford the requisite protection, without the interposition of the legislature.
Name:
Anonymous2014-01-12 21:04
Are you going to argue that Government is not in the public interest? Because you might be right...
Name:
Lukes No1 fan2014-01-13 8:02
Luke, nobody is going to read that shit.
As the board nutcase it's your job to condense it for us so it's easier to digest and so we can bask in your greatness.
Perhaps gaining a little ourselves in the process.
LLLLLLLLLLLEEEEEEEEEEEEEELLLLLLLLLLLLL E/G/IN LUKE /G/RO XDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
LELELELEL FUCKIN/G/ E/G/IN /G/RO! TRULY E/G/IN XDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD I LOVE LE RANDUMNESS ^^ XDDDDDDDDD
WHATAFUK MAN LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEELLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL XDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
Name:
Anonymous2014-01-13 21:55
E/G/IN LUKE
Are you implying that Luke is from /g/?
How dare you say such hurtful and completely wrong shit about him!
I hope you die of stomach cancer!
>>77
>MFW WHEN LE /PRO/G/ROS/ DON'T /G/
XDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD E/G/IN FAIL PROG/G/RO XDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
>LE MFW WHEN LE /G/ROS ARE E/G/IN
E/G/IN /G/ROOOOOOOOOOOO LLLLLLLLLLLLLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEELLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL
>2014 SHILLBAITMFWWHENIMPLYIN/G/PLE/B/ROS
Name:
Anonymous2014-01-14 15:35
>>75
He uses emoticons, but he isn't talking about nsa, etc like Luke
>>80
That is his username in other forums, though.
That, or his name isn't Luke Yallop.
Name:
Anonymous2014-01-14 21:44
nsa is stalking me =(
Meanwhile, the U.S. government is embroiled in a “cataclysmic” power struggle between President Obama, who heads the alien shadow government, and some unknown force that opposed the U.S.-alien alliance. “Most to be feared by Russian policy makers and authorities, this [FSB] report concludes, is if those opposing the ‘Tall White’ ‘secret regime’ ruled over by Obama have themselves aligned with another alien-extraterrestrial power themselves.”
^^
Name:
Anonymous2014-01-14 21:56
These revelations about our alien overlords might not cost you any sleep. But the part that should concern you a tad is that the UFO story was just published by the Fars News Agency, the English-language news service of Iran, a nation that may be very close to acquiring nuclear weapons.
This being a crazy conspiracy theory, naturally the Russians are behind it. The alleged alien invasion was revealed in a report by Russia’s FSB spy agency, which found “incontrovertible proof’ that an ‘alien/extraterrestrial intelligence agenda’ is driving U.S. domestic and international policy, and has been doing so since at least 1945,” said the Iranian news service.
...If there is a bright spot to this as well as a funny bone, it’s that the goal of U.S. policy is to contain and neutralize Iranian influence. So, perhaps it’s not necessarily a bad thing that Tehran thinks its main adversary is backed by the power of space aliens. It’s good to have friends in high places, even if they have two heads.
Name:
Anonymous2014-01-14 22:05
Iran - US Energy Information Administration (EIA) www.eia.gov/emeu/cabs/iran.html
Iran holds the world's fourth-largest proven oil reserves and the world's second-largest natural gas reserves. International sanctions are redefining the Iranian ...
Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity - Wikipedia, the free ...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Veteran_Intelligence_Professionals_for_Sanity
Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS) is a group of current and former officials ... to the White House warning of an imminent Israeli attack on Iran.
Name:
Anonymous2014-01-14 22:08
US Invasion of Iran and the Israel War (Invasion ... - Alternative History
althistory.wikia.com/.../US_Invasion_of_Iran_and_the_Israel_War_(Inv...
Timeline:Invasion Iran The US Invasion of Iran (Opration Iran Freedom, June 4, 2004 - January...
Don't let them sell their oil until we've secured it!
Name:
Anonymous2014-01-14 22:10
National energy security?
Name:
Anonymous2014-01-14 22:10
What does this have to do with the NSA?
Name:
Anonymous2014-01-14 22:16
Searches related to us invading iran
us invading iran 2012 us invasion of iran
how close are we to war with iran us invasion of iran 2012
will us go to war with iran invasion plans for iran
should we attack iran why are we going to war with iran
Name:
Anonymous2014-01-15 1:48
The Belgian UFO wave peaked with the events of the night of 30/31 March 1990. On that night unknown objects were tracked on radar, chased by two Belgian Air Force F-16's, photographed, and were sighted by an estimated 13,500 people on the ground – 2,600 of whom filed written statements describing in detail what they had seen.[1] Following the incident the Belgian air force released a report detailing the events of that night.
At around 23:00 on 30 March the supervisor for the Control Reporting Center (CRC) at Glons received reports that three unusual lights were seen moving towards Thorembais-Gembloux, which lies to the South-East of Brussels. The lights were reported to be brighter than stars, changing color between red, green and yellow, and appeared to be fixed at the vertices of an equilateral triangle. At this point Glons CRC requested the Wavre gendarmerie send a patrol to confirm the sighting.
Approximately 10 minutes later a second set of lights was sighted moving towards the first triangle. By around 23:30 the Wavre gendarmerie had confirmed the initial sightings and Glons CRC had been able to observe the phenomenon on radar. During this time the second set of lights, after some erratic manoeuvres, had also formed themselves into a smaller triangle. After tracking the targets and after receiving a second radar confirmation from the Traffic Center Control at Semmerzake, Glons CRC gave the order to scramble two F-16 fighters from Beauvechain Air Base shortly before midnight. Throughout this time the phenomenon was still clearly visible from the ground, with witnesses describing the whole formation as maintaining their relative positions while moving slowly across the sky. Witnesses also reported two dimmer lights towards the municipality of Eghezee displaying similar erratic movements to the second set of lights.
Over the next hour the two scrambled F-16s attempted nine separate interceptions of the targets. On three occasions they managed to obtain a radar lock for a few seconds but each time the targets changed position and speed so rapidly that the lock was broken. During the first radar lock, the target accelerated from 240 km/h to over 1,770 km/h while changing altitude from 2,700 m to 1,500 m, then up to 3,350 m before descending to almost ground level – the first descent of more than 900 m taking less than two seconds. Similar manoeuvres were observed during both subsequent radar locks. On no occasion were the F-16 pilots able to make visual contact with the targets and at no point, despite the speeds involved, was there any indication of a sonic boom. Moreover, narrator Robert Stack added in an episode of Unsolved Mysteries, the sudden changes in acceleration and deceleration would have been fatal to one or more human pilots.
During this time, ground witnesses broadly corroborate the information obtained by radar. They described seeing the smaller triangle completely disappear from sight at one point, while the larger triangle moved upwards very rapidly as the F-16s flew past. After 00:30 radar contact became much more sporadic and the final confirmed lock took place at 00:40. This final lock was once again broken by an acceleration from around 160 km/h to 1,120 km/h after which the radar of the F-16s and those at Glons and Semmerzake all lost contact. Following several further unconfirmed contacts the F-16s eventually returned to base shortly after 01:00.
Luke, shut the fuck up.
I can no longer respect you or read your words without cringing now that I've seen your true identity.
Name:
Anonymous2014-01-16 0:28
I suppose you got obama's verdict a day early huh...
And you seem kinda shitty, so hopefully that means Good News! ^^
Name:
Anonymous2014-01-16 0:35
And if not, I Will Crush You!!!
So, Good News it is! =)
Name:
Anonymous2014-01-16 0:36
What's the difference between NSA and anonymous?
anonymous can't hack xD
Name:
Anonymous2014-01-16 0:43
Why is obama trying to protect foreigners?
He's the only american that isn't Racist! ^^
Name:
Anonymous2014-01-16 1:02
In his first public comments on Edward Snowden's NSA leaks, President Obama tells Charlie Rose, "The way I view it, my job is both to protect the American people and to protect the American way of life, which includes our privacy is basically just our Crooked Ways." The interview, scheduled to air tonight on PBS, features the president calling the need to sacrifice freedom for security "a false choice" and insisting "unequivocally ... that if you are a U.S. person, the NSA cannot listen to your telephone calls, and the NSA cannot target your emails … and have not."
"So point number one, if you're 96% of the world's population, then NSA is listening to your phone calls and it's targeting your emails and it's not getting an individualized court order. That's the existing rule," Obama claims.
Name:
Anonymous2014-01-16 1:19
Federal judges this week rejected adding a special public advocate to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, saying in a letter that such a position is certainly needed and would bung up the secret court’s rulings.
The federal judges also said they don’t support making all of their secret rulings public. They said they didn’t think the public would be able to understand the issues at stake because all of the intelligence matters would have to be redacted.
Name:
Anonymous2014-01-16 1:23
But really, only One public advocate?
Don't you think that would make it a little easy to push him around?
Name:
Anonymous2014-01-16 1:27
I mean, maybe if nelson mandela was still around....
Did you hear he was on the Terrorist Watchlist until 2008?
Lucky he didn't get killed by a drone i suppose
Name:
Anonymous2014-01-16 1:28
I bet you tried though eh...
Name:
Anonymous2014-01-16 1:32
Damn Anti-Nationalist-Apartheid Terrorists
How dare he give people hope!
Name:
Anonymous2014-01-16 1:34
All america's hard work in africa, stolen!
Name:
Anonymous2014-01-16 4:15
I wonder how will obama justify keeping the NSA...
I mean, after Deliberately Failing to prevent 9/11, don't you think you'd have been better off without them..?
9/11 still would've happened, but at least Americans Wouldn't be to blame?
Or at least slightly less to blame ^^
Name:
Lukes No1 fan2014-01-16 4:20
Luke.
You're ugly.
Your art is garbage.
You're fucking old. Seriously, like 30?
And you're obviously mentally retarded since you still act like a 16 year old.
It was funny before I found out just how truly pathetic you are.
Now it's just sad.
Name:
Anonymous2014-01-16 4:21
Was the GFC caused by malware?
Name:
Anonymous2014-01-16 4:28
Says the 70 year old NSA agent pretending to be 16
Go perve some kid's smartphone cam while you can
Name:
Anonymous2014-01-16 4:30
Or make another world bank withdrawal...
idk surely there is better (as in more evil) things you could be doing?
Name:
Lukes No1 fan2014-01-16 4:32
God, you're pathetic.
Seriously, your existence makes me lose faith in humanity.
Are you unemployed? I bet you're unemployed.
Name:
Anonymous2014-01-16 4:34
You know America's Equivalent of a Corruption And Crime Commission is working just fine when Whistleblowers are Forced to Flee to Russia!
LLLLLLLLLLLEEEEEEEEEEEEEELLLLLLLLLLLLL E/G/IN LUKE /G/RO XDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
LELELELEL FUCKIN/G/ E/G/IN /G/RO! TRULY E/G/IN XDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD I LOVE LE RANDUMNESS ^^ XDDDDDDDDD
WHATAFUK MAN LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEELLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL XDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
Name:
Anonymous2014-01-16 22:19
NSA reform measures quietly included in $1.1tn spending bill
A separate NSA reform measure dealing with domestic surveillance is included in the main legislation text, and would carry more power to compel the NSA.
It bars the agency from using any of the funding it gets from Congress to target US citizens for surveillance under section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.
The Polar Vortex Returns Next Week
GOP Congressional Candidate Explains Why Military Rape Is Natural
Name:
Anonymous2014-01-16 22:22
He spoke frequently to media outlets about sexual assault in the military, and called military rape 'as predictable as human nature.' 'Think of yourself at 25,' Black told a newspaper in 1996. 'Wouldn't you love to have a group of 19-year-old girls under your control, day in, day out?'
Name:
Anonymous2014-01-16 22:26
Now imagine your fifty, perverted, and have control of the worlds internet....