NSA similies

If someone shits in your drinking water, and you don't notice, it's okay because it doesn't affect you..?

A police officer complains of being arrested
A soldier of being shot

NSA smilies? You mean those free downloads that come with a bunch of spying adware?

Heh. I remember you.
Welcome back, ya dumb crazy bastard!
I look forward to ignoring your posts again.

^^

=)

It would affect you if you drank the water

NSA's phone surveillance program probably unlawful, US judge rules

Mr Leon argued that American founding father James Madison, one of the authors of the US constitution, would be "aghast" at the government's breach of citizens' rights to privacy.

But Mr Leon said the appeal process would take at least six months and delayed his order "in light of the significant national security interests at stake... and the novelty of the constitutional issues."

"This is analogous to a hostage-taker taking 50 people hostage, shooting 10 and then say, 'You give me full amnesty and I'll let the other 40 go'," General Alexander told US television.

In a stinging rebuke to President Barack Obama’s surveillance policies, a federal judge on Monday branded the National Security Agency’s mass collection of Americans’ telephone data “almost Orwellian” and likely a violation of the Constitution. Former NSA contractor Edward Snowden cheered the ruling.

“The Government does not cite a single instance in which analysis of the NSA’s bulk metadata collection actually stopped an imminent attack, or otherwise aided the Government in achieving any objective that was time-sensitive in nature,” he wrote.

Among Leon’s other flourishes, he warned that the so-called war on terrorism “realistically could be forever!” He expressed concerns about the “almost Orwellian technology that enables the Government to store and analyze the phone metadata of every telephone user in the United States.” And he said modern-day surveillance tactics would have been “the stuff of science fiction” at the time a precedent ruling was issued.

"This is analogous to a hostage-taker taking 5 billion people hostage, shooting 1 billion and then saying, 'They were terrorists!'," General Alexander didn't told US television.

But Mr Leon didn't said the appeal process would take at least six months and delayed his order "in light of the novel national security interests at stake... and the significance of the constitutional issues."

>>9
And the judge rules, "it's probably unlawful"...

911? bah! Al queda has no obligation to uphold human rights In other countries!

The Al Queda Constitution does not apply outside Al Queda! ^^

But the Al Queda Jurisdiction is Global, Baby!

Maybe they all went to the highest high court..
...the one in the sky..

summon (someone) with a subpoena.
"the Queen is above the law and cannot be subpoenaed"

^^ the Queen?

which one?

..You do not even know of the queen?

hmm...
So national security is a bit like fluoride?

^^ It makes everything okay?

I wonder what General Alexander's thoughts would be on releasing his own communication meta-data to the public?
We need to check for National Security purposes... =)

Focus on `suspiciously encrypted' coms...

"in light of the significant national security interests at stake... and the novelty of the constitutional issues."

So, your Constitution is a 'Novelty' now? ^^ Gold, that is...
And you base all your authority in a novelty document...? =)

Inheritance states that your authority itself is ruled 'Novelty'..

here's a line from the australian constitution:

Right to just compensation – Section 51(xxxi) creates a right to compensation "on just terms" for "acquisition of property" by the Commonwealth from any state or person. The "acquisition of property", itself, is not restricted, but the High Court has understood the expression broadly so as to give a broad entitlement to compensation.

Isn't privacy a property? ^^

You think my privacy belongs to you?

I've sworn no oaths...

>>21
It was novelty at the time of James Madison.

Sister: Father?
Father: Yes, sister?
Sister: I'm confused...
Father: Me too..

The Eleventh Amendment (1795), in part, clarifies judicial power over foreign nationals.

The Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State, or by Citizens or Subjects of any Foreign State.

>>25
She is a nun.

I find it curious that nsa news pop up almost every day. Seems like someone is forcing them in order to divert everybody's attention from something much more interesting.

>>28
No, Luke, nooo!
Hating the NSA is fine, but don't go full conspiracy nutjob on us.
Would break my heart

(̷̶̡͙̬̝͖͕͓̱͇̦͈̪̰̜̝̗̮ͦͬ͌̆͑́っͩͨ̇̽̑͐̂ͩ̔̓̇̆҉̷̳̭͙͇̝̺̪̝͢͝λ̧̨̬̼̞̥̲̤̺̯͙̬͍̱̥̺̊́̊ͮ͡♡͙̗̦̦̜͖͖̠̻͎͚̾͌̂̀̍̆̎̈̔ͧ̎͒͊͟͢͟Д̂ͦ̉͒ͥ̅̓ͬ͝҉̴̤͖͍͉͜͟♡̝̯̣̲͈͇̒̀̅͑ͬ̔̃͢͢͡)̊̽ͤ͑̊̌̏̈́ͮͧͯͬ͊̅̏ͭ͏̵̢̫̬͚̩͝っ̷̸̨̪͇͍͓̼͙̩̖̬͈̝͚̯̺̱̹͉̼̓ͬ́ͬ͋ͪ͌͂̆͋̓̔ͪ̓̎͡ᕦ̴̞̯͇̺͈͔̩͖̜̝̮̓ͩ̊̈́̆̉̑ͧͮ̑ͣ̿ͮ͊́͡(̬̪͎̰͚̜̯͇̻̥͍̮̬͕̯͖͙ͤͣ̾͛͠ͅ`̲̦̞̯͎̻̰̉̏ͦ̉̾̍̅̾̑͊̑͗ͬͩͪ̚͟ಠ̒̊͌͋̇̽̋̽̉ͥ̔̑ͭ͘͟͝҉̰̮͍͍͈̼͍̙̤͍͕̤̱͎͍͕̲̞̪ω̈́͆ͨ̔̐ͬ̒ͦͥ̽̆͑͑ͨ̌͏̀҉̣͉̖̲̻̫̥̥̝̻̱ಠ̧̩̦̬̯̲̹̊ͫ͋͊́͊̅̓̆̑̂͛̀̚͜)̸̷͇̭̟̞̮͉̺̋ͥͪͨ̋̓́ͫͩ̑̚ͅᕤ͊̃ͩͪ҉̵̨̱̤̗̘̘̖̀)̛͙̙͍͎̖̪ͦ͋̆̋̒̎ͫͬͩ̈̇͆ͣͬͥͨ̑̔͘͝)͎͙̮̺͙̠̟̘̹̙̟͈͂̆̾̿̀͘͟͝)̗̗̺̠̰̖̹̙̞̃͌̎̐ͦ͑̀ͥͭ̍̉̅̽̄͌͋̃̆͡͡★̴̵̧̢͕̲͙͇̳̻̙̤̲̞̫͔͈̖̠̪̪̤̆ͤ́͗͡ͅ≦̛͈̦̟͙̰̦̞̫̖͇ͪͣͪ̽̌̆̇̃̾̋̚͜͢⁎̉̉ͫ͊̄ͩͯͫ͑̍̇͌̇̆͊͟҉̧̩͇͈͎̪̪̝͈̮͕͈̮̣̻̳̺̖͔̕*̛̳̝͙̖̲͚̣̤̮̺̼̝̱̻̣̻̟͊̑͑̎̈̀ͧ̌͒͛̑ͦ̂̆̈̿̅́̚ͅ☠̬̗̜͙̪̜̘̭̥̰̱͉͍̠̼̮͗̂͐͐͒ͯ̃̈͂ͮ̓͗̑̊ͫ̓ͣ̀̀͡⁎̸͒̏̈́̓̏͛̾͑̑͗̊̿̇ͥ͞҉̵̧͖͍̻̰͓ꂚ͍̣͉̟̯͉̰̹ͥ͗͆ͬ̿͊̆͆ͯ͋ͯ̊͆ͧ͒͌̇̾͗͘*̶̷̣͈̝̣̲̟̩̌͗̌ͧ͋͑̈̃̽̊͑̇̑ͦ̿͜͢͝ͅᵎ̴̧͍̱̯̺͙̥̥͎̞̬̩͔͉̅ͫ̅̾̂ͤ̌ͅ=̶̛̱͈͎̘̥̒ͭͯ̋͐̅̓ ͤ̏̿̊̄͒͆͂̏ͯ̈́̇̎̓ͤͬ̍ͫ͟҉̡̦̫̤͎̼͙̣̻̳̤̤͉̩̭ͅ ̸̨̫͉̥̙͔͇̞̼̳̪̬͖̣͊̆͐͐͊̎͑ͯͩ̚͝ ̨͊͋ͪͮ̈̉̏̾̈́̉̋̈̄ͣ͆̏ͫ̚͏̟̩͈͕̥̤̘̯̼͚͚͘ ̸ͩͣ̓͑͌͠҉͈̯̼͍̭̤̘͈̫̝̣̙̱̦̫ ̶̜͕̯̮ͨ̐ͫͬ̐͂͛̄̉̽̐̓̕͢ͅ ̛̹̬̤͔̫͖͇̮̗̟͕̗̼̜͚̥̫̙͒͌̀͗̄ͯ̆͛͟ ̛̍ͨ̃̀ͣ̓ͩͣ̿̔̌͊ͦ͂͢҉̨̜̺͉̙̣̼̼̥͍͚̗͍̯̪̗̱ ̷̛ͧ̈ͮͧ͘͜͏̲̘̳̫̣̪̺̯̘̘ ̴̸̶̘̦̭̞͕̲͇͎̙̩̗͍͙͉̠ͭ̇̈́ͮ̌̐̆́̉̾̾̃̔̏ͭ͗̋̚͟ ̧̡̼͉̠̜̰̞͇̜̥̠͓̦͓͎͉̝̖̹͙̏͛̽ͮ̔͂͊́ ̶̴̡̛̣̗̗̳̪̫͖̥̘̻̳̦͕͇͚͕͕͑ͣ̈́̇ͬͭ̚̚͠ͅ ̵̷̛͎͍̙̩̘͐ͥͫ͐ͦ͆̾̊̐̓́ ̢̧̇̓ͫ̇̄̋̀ͬ͊̀ͧͦ͌͌̓҉͇̱͚̠̪̖͙͓̙̀ ̶̅͗̏ͣ̽ͤͣ͏̸̻̻̲̦̟̳̟̖̯͖̯̥̣͍̙̘̦Ψ̡̩͓͉̞̲̤̼̱̤̥̪͚̥̦͚̱̣̎ͭ̍̎̾͐͠_̴̡̛̝̫̻͖͇͎̳̯̗̟̜̬̤͚̻̠̗̇̽̈́͐̂ͪ̂̌͗̋̍͋̂̈́̈̇͒̈̉͞͝(̷̷̬͈̬̮̤̠̩͈͇̠͑̊ͬ͗̾͂͛̒̄̋̃̒͠Ò̴͔̰̠̫̠̞̜̬͉͓͍̜͊̈̑̽ͩ͢͠ ̷̸̧͖͔͙̞̂̿ͮ̽͊ͫ͋‸̲̼͚̳̀͒ͤ́̑ͩͭ͛͆͌̿̕͠ ̸̶͕͎̳̻̯̥̜ͥ̄̽̊ͪ͐́̋̈ͧ̋̎ͣ͛̾͊ͫͯ̀̕͢Ớͬͣ͆ͯͧͤ̌̌ͩͫ̐ͪ̄ͨͦ͊͢҉̵̛̦͙͍͉̫̯͉̳͓̼̹̬̦̰╬̢̛͕͓̣͉͎̟̰̜̣͍͓̹̭͋͒̐̇́̓ͪ̀ͯ̉̒͌̑͒ͬͯ͊́̚̕͘)̴̖̘̹͓̯̹̯̤͎̻̝͊ͪ͊̑̀̌̈͆ͬ͗͆̚͘
    ̶̷̨̡̰͈̼̤̟̘͉̬̹̤̯̹̯̣̬̺̲̯ͫͯ̈͗͒͌̊̎ͬ͘(̂̃̈́͐̀̎̉́̓ͮͨ͏̸̬͕͉̭͚̜̫̪̝̮͈̺͔̬͔͓̕͝ͅっ̨̲͕̳̗͐͗ͫ͗̉̈́̐̊̒͋͠λ̨̛̟̬̹̗̲̟͉͉͈̘̲͕̼̼̃ͮͦͥ̊̈̓ͬ͑ͨͭ̓̉͟͠♡̎̀ͣ̊̓̋ͭ͑̇ͫͤ͋͊ͧͬ̈͏̢̦͖͍̲̥̖̞͇͖ͅД̗̘͉̳̭͔͖͕̣̦̱̟͔̹̝̝̠̲ͣ̇͌̒͗ͯ̔ͦͧͩ͗͜♡̶̨̪̰̫̫͇͈̭͔̠̬̦̝̲̝̱̗͊̃͐̏̀̃ͪ̌̈ͫͥ̓͌̇ͥ͐̚͢͡ͅ)̴̨̥̫̩͎̥̮͓͚̘̜̪͍ͥ̃̓̉̑ͮ͊̋̇̆̎̚͟͞ͅっ̸̛͕̫̜̥̿̽̀̚ᕦ̸̷̬̭̭̜͉̂ͤͨ̆̽ͫͥ̇ͩ͐ͫ͌̐̌͝͡(̴̛̲͖̩͖̦̲̳͚̯̰̜̟͖ͧ̒̌̀͑͛͑̎̑ͦͩͨͧ̿̆͟͞`͓̦̝̘̗̗̰̥̩͉͉̣͖̲͕̻̣̞ͫͤ͐ͦ̆͗ͨͩͬ̍̿̉́͘ಠͩ͂̈́͡͏̶̼̪̩̺̟̰͇̯̼͈̥̣̗̞̀͡ὠ̢̡̗̜͔̰̮̫̟̪͎̙̯̼̥͚̣͕ͤ̉́ͪͦ́͑́͆ͧ̃ͬ́ͪ̋́̎̚͠ಠ̸̻̦͙͍̞͖̖̠̲̘̗̥̹͓̼͛͐̇̽ͤ̏̂ͫ̊ͮ̃ͨ͐͒͟ͅ)̶͚͉͙̪̱ͣ͒̒͗̉ͨͪ͟͡͝ᕤ̴̸̡̨̗͕̥̮̯̞̤̩̞̤̦̟̜̝̃ͨͧ̊͑͋ͯͫ̿ͬ́̚̚)̙̮̮̫͚̙͙̙̌̾͊ͬͤͬ̏͐̎͛ͯ̀͢ꂚ̶̛̪̝͚̯̫̪̹̻͍̯͖̣̜̜̘͎̮̈̉ͧ̐͗ͨͥ̈́́̂̆ͯͯ̿͊͛͝*̵̍̾ͣ̏̉̉ͪ̍͛ͦ̽ͨ͠҉̺͉̝̺̲̤̟̳̺̗̞̹ᵎ̫̼̳̟̘̮̟̦͚ͪ͊͗͂͑ͬͩ̈́͛̒̿ͤ́ͥ́=̢̨̞̟̻̳͈̪̩̗̳͓͓͉̜̻̍̒ͪ͑͗̌̅͋ͩ͛̆͢͠ ̶̰̱̻̣̝ͩ́̓͋͝ͅ ̡̌ͦ̍ͫ͛ͦ́͡͡͏͓͈̲͈̰̝͇̠ ̰̻̞̪̽́̆ͭͧ͜͜ ̮͓̟̬͔̬̰̯͕̻͙̫͇̫͖͉͌ͫ̃̄ͤ̓͘͟͡ ̷̨̢̥̜̘̥̲̪̻̞̰̠̻̥̣͙͕̲̹̿ͭ̐̾̄͒͌̉͛̋͌ͥ̓̂̌ ̷̜̯̹̻̜̫̭̪̙̹͍̙͉͊ͪ̑ͪ̇ͣͫ̈͌́ ̱̫̮̮̲̯̺͆͐ͨ̐̾̂̽ͩ̒ͧ̄̂ͨ̀̕ ̴̵̵̨̗͖̤̗͔͕̯͉̤̮̻̬̩̫̘̲̹̳͌̾̋ͯ̍̿̂̀͗ͅ ͂͒̀͌͛̈́̈͊͛̽ͣ̄̄̐̿̚͞҉̹͙̮̯͉ ̶̷͙͓͓̟̰͈̫̣̱͇̝̙̤̘̟̏̅̇͗̃ͫͦ̚̚͢͡͝ ̷̡̥̘̰̘̝̃͆̆̄̅͘͝ ̶̡̨̞̺̱͖̌̒͐ͦ͘͝ ̷̛̔ͭ̏ͫͯ̓͒̈́̅ͧ̂ͧ͑ͨ̄̌͂ͤ̅҉̮̮͇͈̗͓̞̻̰͚̬͇̩͙̭̩̭͔́ ̌̓̐ͤͭ͏̴̨͉͓̰̺̟͎̞̠͎̘̤͚͡ͅΨ̷̵̷̛͓̺̙͔̯̯̮̣̫̼́ͦ̔ͥ̄̄̓͋̾̂̄ͣ͐͠_̨̛̛̞̰̖̗͓͍̭̥̮̘̱̘͕͗͒ͥͣ̀ͩͩ̽ͣ̊̄ͧ͌ͥ̆͘͟ͅ(̥̥͍̬̲̣͖̱̟̌̆̊̃̑ͥ́̎̓ͧ͋̊ͮ̆̈̚͡͝ͅỜ̱͍̭̬̼̲̝͓̯̻̬͙ͬ͒͑ͦ̈̃̀̈́̚͝ͅ ̡̢͉̦͍̙̐ͯ̃ͮͤ̈́͌ͥ͌̽ͪ͝‸̧̩̙̹̼̙̠̱̮̦͙̦͖͖̈́́͐̈ͨ̀̊͑̒̈̎̔̔ͣ͒͋̕͡ ̨̧̨͎̦͎̼͚ͤ͋͛ͥͥ͊ͦ͆͛͌͆̍͆ͮ͝ͅÓ̷̷̙͈̗̤͖͙͇͇̗̳̬͙͍̖̥̮ͥͧ͂ͬͪ̑ͩ̄̍ͧ̍ͪ̚╬̸̴̨̍ͦͭͫ̽͗̾͆͟͏̣̮̭̗̦̣̭̗̪͖̖̻̼̭̥ͅ)̴̻͇̟͇̠͛͂̀̿́̏̇ͫͨ̽̉̊̊̍͢ ̢̼̟̯̞̻͈̭̠̬̝̪̗̟̔̎̓̍ͤ̅̒̀̎ͧͩ̎̊̓ͪͩ̔̕͠͡

lol
yes, the christmas comet... but that's another story.. kinda..

We recommend that the decision to keep secret from the American
people programs of the magnitude of the section 215 bulk telephony meta-data program should be made only after careful deliberation at high levels of government and only with due consideration of and respect for the strong presumption of transparency that is central to democratic governance.
A program of this magnitude should be kept secret from the American people only if (a) the program serves a compelling governmental interest and (b) the efficacy of the program would be substantially impaired if our enemies were to know of its existence.

Merry christmas nsa-tan

mmm money is very compelling ^^

Louis Brandeis famously described as “the right to be let alone — the most comprehensive of rights and the right most valued by civilized men.” ^^

In a free society, one that is genuinely committed to self-
government, people are secure in the sense that they need not fear that their conversations and activities are being watched, monitored, questioned, interrogated, or scrutinized. Citizens are free from this kind of fear. In unfree societies, by contrast, there is no right to be let alone, and
people struggle to organize their lives to avoid the government’s probing eye. The resulting unfreedom jeopardizes, all at once, individual liberty, self-government, economic growth, and basic ideals of citizenship.

Unnecessary or excessive surveillance can create risks that outweigh any gain. Those who do not live within our borders should be treated with dignity and respect, and an absence of such treatment can create real risks (such as comets ^^).

The purposes of surveillance must be legitimate. If they are not, no amount of “balancing” can justify surveillance. For this reason, it is exceptionally important to create explicit prohibitions and safeguards, designed to reduce the risk that surveillance will ever be undertaken for illegitimate ends.

Insufficient....

Congress should establish a “scheme which will afford effective
redress to people who are injured by improper federal intelligence
activity.

^^ we can call it the christmas scheme..

In general, the federal government is prohibited from intercepting the contents of private telephone calls and e-mails of any person, except in three circumstances..

1. If a federal judge issues a warrant based on a finding that there is probable cause to believe that an individual is committing, has committed, or is about to commit a federal crime and that communications concerning that crime will be seized as a result of the proposed interception.

2.  judge of the FISC issues a warrant based on a finding that the purpose of the surveillance is to obtain
foreign intelligence information, the interception takes place
inside the United States, and there is probable cause to believe that the target of the surveillance is an agent of a foreign power (which includes, among other things, individuals engaged in international terrorism, the international proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, and clandestine intelligence activities).

3. (skip 30 pages of bullshit..) Although section 702 has clearly served an important function in helping the United States to uncover and prevent terrorist attacks both in the United States and around the world (and thus helps protect our allies), the question remains whether it achieves that goal in a way that unnecessarily sacrifices individual privacy and damages foreign relations.

Recommendation 12
We recommend that, if the government legally intercepts a
communication under section 702, or under any other authority that
justifies the interception of a communication on the ground that it is directed at a non-United States person who is located outside the United States, and if the communication either includes a United States person as a participant or reveals information about a United States person:

Wholly apart from the Fourth Amendment, how should the United
States treat non-United States persons when they are outside the United States?

Well i dunno, how would you like to be treated? ^^
obviously you Don't want to be left alone.... I shouldn't really have to hold your hand though, that's why i got you a COMET for christmas.. =D

=) i can just imagine the look on little obama's face...
don't forget to wake up early ^^

Well, these words are at least as good as your best...
The worst they can be is true.... =)

Probably 50/50 though... neither is much better or worse =D

I'd still like my privacy back though ^^

As a result of changing technology, key distinctions about
intelligence and communications technology have eroded over time: state vs. nonstate, foreign vs. domestic, war vs. non-war, military vs. civilian, legal vs. illegal, classified vs. corrupt, democracy vs. dictatorship, war vs. terrorism, terrorism vs. political opinion, terrorism vs. whistleblowing, terrorism vs. breathing, life vs. death, and freedom vs. comet....

As a result of changing technology, ideals, key distinctions about [/s]
intelligence and communications technology[/s] ideals have eroded over time...

In an ideal world, IAD could form the core of the cyber capability of DHS. DHS has been designated as the lead cabinet department for cyber security defense. Any effort to transfer IAD out of the Defense Department budget, however, would likely meet with opposition in Congress. computers would be secure from snoopy the snake...

In an ideal world, governments would constantly reaffirm their authority by allowing people to say No...

In an ideal world, it wouldn't take a comet to fix things.... ^^

Necessary and Proportionate? =)

What else might end the war of terror?
and bring Peace to America?

Two birds with one whopper ^^

If only your words meant anything..
Then they might mean something...

You and your right to bear arms... you missed a clause or two mancow..

Even when you aren't allowed to digitally rape people in your own country... that doesn't stop you..

I heard politicians calling for snowden to be shot...
Now if that is for One thumb-drive worth of information, physically plugged into a machine directly... What do you think you get if you scale that up to acres of storage, stolen remotely? A very big bullet?
And let us remember that the whole point of spying is 'Breaking the law in order to find larger breaches'.. isn't it?
Like a kind of Harm Minimization?

You realise that people saying no isn't you losing authority, it's when they can't say no that you've lost it...
Maybe your just a bit over-sensitive..?
Much prefer Unchecked and Unwarranted Privilege, isn't it?

T̶̡͆͊ͨ̈́͋̅̀͌͑͛͐͏̹͍͖̞͉̳̺̪̫̙̰̀͘ͅͅH̸̦̖̳͙̺̼͍͔̼̳̼͍̘̥̜̍͛̿̒͌̊ͦ̔̑̊̒́Ể͉̼̞̦͉͕̞̖̲̮̠̼̖̤͎̬̗ͦ̔̄̍ͪͣ͜͝͡͠ͅ ̷̴͉͚̱̦̦̝̹̭̳͍̪̺̻̗͑ͥͮ̽͂̍̊͗̊̿̾͒ͬ͛̓̽ͅN̑ͪ̏̊͏̟͙̺̝̹̳̞̯͓̩̖͓̀ͅS̨̽͒ͮ͗̍ͫͮ͊̑̂̑̍ͧ͆͂̌͋̀̚̚͜҉̜̺̝̖͓̲͔̺͍̼̮̜̼̙̪̻̯Ä̢̤͎̪̙̤͉͙͉̠̼͉̘͓̰́ͭͪ̄ͭ̋̈ͯͪ͞͞
̴̴̢̹̫͍̤͎̻̹͍͉͎̪̣̭̩̻ͤ̓͐͂̐ͯ͑̇ͤͭͭͩ͆I͈̪͖͙̰̣͙͎ͬͬͫͮͦ͛͊ͣ̈́͛ͥ̉͐̕͡Ș̸̖̝̼̰̠͔͇͔͔̜͕̲̪̹͇ͫ̓͌̑ͤ̉ͮ͆̾ͤ͂ͤ͐́ ̶͗̂̈́ͭ҉̵̧̞̤̲͉̹̖̘̦̘̗͍͠ͅW̶̡̹͓̰̮̼͇̠̺͖̰̹̘̙ͮͤ̀͐͗ͦ͋͆ͧ͝͞Ą̛̠̱̪͕̪̣͔̰̣͕̫͉̮̬̝͍̰́ͫ̐͌ͧ̈ͪ̉̂ͭͣ̀͘T̷̨̫͕̯̙͚̦̯̹̰̞̻̠ͪͤͪ͗̇͆̊͗ͬͤ̅͒̓͛̂͐̏̆͘̕͞C̸̻̲̪͚̾̿͛̊͆͗̍̒̅͐͋̓̀H̢̼̼̤͖̳͇̬͚̦͔̆͋̆͌ͭͧͧ̈́ͤ̂ͤͧ̾͋̀͢͝ͅI̘̰̦͖̦͉̱̮͈̫̞̥͕̺̜̟ͯͦ̋̎̇͂̆͛̊ͨ̅̊͂̈̀̉́N̏̑̓͂͟҉̦̝̟̻̠͎̰͠G̴̾͒͐ͧ҉̩͍͕̙͔̲̙̦̬ͅ
̢̽ͪ̾͌́ͮ̾́͐́̾ͣ̀̈́̅͡͏͕̩͈̱͕͍̮̜͓̙̰̯͝Y̢̘̦̙̩̗̜͆̍̈̍ͬ̈́ͥͥ͋ͪ͑ͬͧ͒̌̆ͦͭ͠Ỏ̷̸̧ͣͨ͌̋̇̐ͪ̚҉͚̼̙̩̝̮̱̲͍͙͉͞ͅU̸̹͓̬͚̫̠̹͍͗̌̽̊͆ͭͫͣ̓̍ͯͧ͗̽͊̚ ͂ͩ̾̄̽͝͏̸̻͈̺͙͈;̨̨͓̗͙͈̓ͯ̽͐ͬͨͣ̋̐͢͢-̈́͂̃̀ͫ̄̾ͮ̃҉̴͈̬̤̳͇̝̠͕͎̩͇̣͙͈̀͘̕)̧̧̜̜̹͈̙̜̙̖͚͍̝͚̥̬̤̮̦ͪ͛͊̚͡ͅ

>>56
Oh no!
^{I pooped a little}