Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

Minimum IQ needed for a CS

Name: Anonymous 2013-10-09 12:49

I scored a 136 (FSIQ) on the WAIS-IV. Am I good enough for CS or should I go into biology?

Name: Anonymous 2013-10-09 13:02

Your IQ is fine.
You thinking IQ is significant suggests that you're not smart enough though.

Name: Anonymous 2013-10-09 13:07

congratulations, you're smarter than Richard Feynman

Name: Anonymous 2013-10-09 14:48

OP here. That's good to hear. I'm also considering a math degree, but the cutoff point for math is 140.

Name: Anonymous 2013-10-09 15:08

You have a promising career as a burger flipping with an iq that low

Name: Anonymous 2013-10-09 16:28

>>4
I have CS and math degrees and my IQ is 110.

The IQ test is basically just a test of how long you can look at colorful patterns before you stop giving a fuck. In my case is was well less than 10 minutes.

Name: Anonymous 2013-10-09 17:50

>>6
So IQ is basically autism quotient?

Name: Anonymous 2013-10-09 22:35

rounds corners

Name: Anonymous 2013-10-09 22:58

>>6
>>7
>le pedophile sage

Name: Anonymous 2013-10-10 0:50

>>7
Its worse, it measures the specific "autistic" ability to discriminate arbitrary patterns(Ravens typically) which is not even present in all autists. In the process of evolution, how hard would be the selection pressure to distinguish abstract, monochromatic patterns? Thats why sub-saharan Africans score so low, they haven't been exposed to the concept of such patterns at all. IQ tests are so culture bound its not even funny. We think that "simple patterns" should be something universal but in fact the patterns been absent for most part of our history.
It would be better to replace such abstract patterns with more universal/realistic pictures(and make them more unique looking):e.g. photo of a tree, photo of a sun, photo of a pyramid/cat/fish,etc and compose tests from such photographs(replacing the small elements with photos). I bet IQ scores will skyrocket and people would pay more attention to tests.
 The other problem with such tests is that they don't provide anything "fun" to solve. Any third-rate puzzle game has better graphics and gameplay. The general public view IQ tests as esoteric "logic/math abstract bullshit" and doesn't have any motivation beyond finishing the test as soon as possible. The same exact public would memorize the patterns and perfect any puzzle flash game they play a for a couple of hours. Even your mom could learn to play such a puzzle perfectly, despite not being an "IQ genius". Forcing oneself to take an IQ test is equivalent to playing a puzzle with no gameplay, no feedback, no graphics and no reward(beyond a score). Who would waste time training to solve IQ tests all day? Who would want to analyze abstract, primitive patterns all day? Obviously not anyone normal. That leaves only those types you could describe as autistic or pathologically dedicated to such tasks(an effort to "improve their IQ" by solving abstract, meaningless puzzles). What this leaves out is creative intelligence and lateral thinking/thinking out of the box, which is replaced by primitive linear, multiple-choice patterns which require only the ability of pattern recognition and basic analogical reasoning. You can't call that "Intelligence".

Name: BIOLOGY 2013-10-10 1:19

GO INTO MY ANUS

Name: Anonymous 2013-10-10 1:20

░░░░░░░░░▄░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▄
░░░░░░░░▌▒█░░░░░░░░░░░▄▀▒▌
░░░░░░░░▌▒▒█░░░░░░░░▄▀▒▒▒▐
░░░░░░░▐▄▀▒▒▀▀▀▀▄▄▄▀▒▒▒▒▒▐
░░░░░▄▄▀▒░▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒█▒▒▄█▒▐
░░░▄▀▒▒▒░░░▒▒▒░░░▒▒▒▀██▀▒▌
░░▐▒▒▒▄▄▒▒▒▒░░░▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▀▄▒▒
░░▌░░▌█▀▒▒▒▒▒▄▀█▄▒▒▒▒▒▒▒█▒
░▐░░░▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▌██▀▒▒░░░▒▒▒▀ ▌
░▌░▒▄██▄▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒░░░░░░▒▒▒ ▌
▀▒▀▐▄█▄█▌▄░▀▒▒░░░░░░░░░░▒▒ ▐
▐▒▒▐▀▐▀▒░▄▄▒▄▒▒▒▒▒▒░▒░▒░▒▒ ▒▌
▒▒▒▀▀▄▄▒▒▒▄▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒░▒░▒░▒ ▐
░▌▒▒▒▒▒▒▀▀▀▒▒▒▒▒▒░▒░▒░▒░▒▒ ▌
░▐▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒░▒░▒░▒▒▄▒▒
░░▀▄▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒░▒░▒░▒▄▒▒▒▒
░░░░▀▄▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▄▄▄▀▒▒▒▒▄▀
░░░░░░▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▀▀▀▒▒▒▒▒▄▄▀
░░░░░░░░░▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒ wow

Name: Anonymous 2013-10-10 2:22

>>10
Back to progrider, please.

Name: Anonymous 2013-10-10 3:07

>>13
Name one thing progrider does better than my forum

Name: Anonymous 2013-10-10 3:11

░░░░░░░░░▄░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▄
░░░░░░░░▌▒█░░░░░░░░░░░▄▀▒▌
░░░░░░░░▌▒▒█░░░░░░░░▄▀▒▒▒▐
░░░░░░░▐▄▀▒▒▀▀▀▀▄▄▄▀▒▒▒▒▒▐
░░░░░▄▄▀▒░▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒█▒▒▄█▒▐
░░░▄▀▒▒▒░░░▒▒▒░░░▒▒▒▀██▀▒▌
░░▐▒▒▒▄▄▒▒▒▒░░░▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▀▄▒▒
░░▌░░▌█▀▒▒▒▒▒▄▀█▄▒▒▒▒▒▒▒█▒
░▐░░░▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▌██▀▒▒░░░▒▒▒▀ ▌
░▌░▒▄██▄▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒░░░░░░▒▒▒ ▌
▀▒▀▐▄█▄█▌▄░▀▒▒░░░░░░░░░░▒▒ ▐
▐▒▒▐▀▐▀▒░▄▄▒▄▒▒▒▒▒▒░▒░▒░▒▒ ▒▌
▒▒▒▀▀▄▄▒▒▒▄▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒░▒░▒░▒ ▐
░▌▒▒▒▒▒▒▀▀▀▒▒▒▒▒▒░▒░▒░▒░▒▒ ▌
░▐▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒░▒░▒░▒▒▄▒▒
░░▀▄▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒░▒░▒░▒▄▒▒▒▒
░░░░▀▄▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▄▄▄▀▒▒▒▒▄▀
░░░░░░▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▀▀▀▒▒▒▒▒▄▄▀
░░░░░░░░░▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒ wow

Name: Anonymous 2013-10-10 8:23

>>14
Not have one million subforums and having to click 5 subsubsubsubtopics to get a to a "lol" post.

Name: Anonymous 2013-10-10 8:25

That said, it's not just pedorider, it's this textboard and every other textboard out there. Fuck you FV your forum is shit.

Name: Anonymous 2013-10-10 8:51

>>16
I've made minor changes to make subforums more visible and added last 20 posts link(zetaboards portal feature).
I don't know why you need to get to those "Latest & greatest" posts instead of viewing a category and selecting forums(like narrowing down with filter the precise information you want to get from the forum tree structure). I was perfectly fine with the selection, and i could use the dropdown menu in forum to quickly switch to arbitrary forum in couple clicks(its located on any forum footer).

Name: Anonymous 2013-10-10 9:21

>>6
What did you score on the putnam?

Name: Anonymous 2013-10-10 9:41

that's nice and all, but Jacob Barnett will accomplish more in his lifetime than you would if they figured out how to reverse entropy and extended your lifespan indefinitely.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/11/jacob-barnett-autistic-14-year-old-nobel-prize_n_3254920.html

>Today, Barnett -- now 14 -- is a Master's student, on his way to earning a PhD in quantum physics. According to the BBC, the teen, who boasts an IQ of 170, has already been tipped to one day win the Nobel Prize.

>Since enrolling at Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI) at the age of 10, Barnett has flourished -- astounding his professors, peers and family with his spectacular intelligence.

>The teen tutors other college students in subjects like calculus and is a published scientific researcher, with an IQ that is believed to be higher than that of Albert Einstein. In fact, according to a 2011 TIME report, Barnett, who frequently tops his college classes, has asserted that he may one day disprove Einstein's Theory of Relativity. (Watch him explain his genius to 60 minutes' Morley Safer in a 2012 interview in the video above.)

Name: Anonymous 2013-10-10 10:58

>>20
He'll be scrubbing toilets, being a debt slave and posting on /prog/ by time he gets to 20.

Name: Anonymous 2013-10-10 14:16

>>20
Is quantum physics even real?

Name: Anonymous 2013-10-10 14:20

>>22
It's as real as reality, but then one must ask the question: Is reality really that real? For me, dreams feel more real than reality!

Name: Anonymous 2013-10-10 15:51

>>23
Thats because you're more grounded/attached to the world in that dream, making it more "realistic" and therefore more physically limiting(an imprecise copy of boring normal waking life).

Name: Anonymous 2013-10-10 16:38

I feel sorry for this kid.
He is going to burn out so hard.
Everybody is building him up so much that when he finally falls it'll really damage him.
Might not even be public, might just be him suffering a breakdown in private because he can't live up to everybody's ludicrous expectations.
Instead of fostering a mindset of learning for the sake of learning they're turning him into a person who learns for the sake of glory

Name: Anonymous 2013-10-10 19:41

>>20
>le pedophile child

>>23
>le pedophile sage

Name: Anonymous 2013-10-10 19:51

>le pedophile child
Holy fuck I laughed hard, fuck you >le pedophile pedophile

>>27
>le pedophile laugh

>>28
>le pedophile >le pedophile

Name: Anonymous 2013-10-10 20:05

Nope.

TBH I don't believe in IQ numbers.

Name: Anonymous 2013-10-10 20:34

>>28
Yes.
I also often find myself disbelieving in the numbers between 60 and 150.

Name: Anonymous 2013-10-11 2:38

>>29
I mean I don't believe it's the be all end all of quantifiers of a persons worth.

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List