A new script in the page: <script type="text/javascript" src="//www.google.com/recaptcha/api/js/recaptcha_ajax.js"></script>
A new display of incompetence in the new thread area: <%RECAPTCHA%>
THANKS A LOT CHINKSPAMMER! Thanks to your high profile spamming, we now can't even sagebomb! If you had done the math and porn spam like we had fucking told you instead of being a lazy, stupid faggot, this never would have happened. But no, you had to make the slide completely obvious, like a complete retard. /prog/ is now dead. I hope your happy.
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-31 0:26
God have mercy on us.
in Christ Jesus.
Amen.
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-31 0:28
Shit. I knew it. The guy was just seeking approval and some kind of leadership with his lame python script. Captchas. Good job.
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-31 0:31
Why complain when you can make an alternative board?
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-31 0:33
>>4
I don't want moderation at all, especially not from some loser who browses w4c.
>>5
So go someplace without moderation. Take responsibility and make your own alternative.
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-31 0:37
>>4
A lot of users made alternative boards. That doesn't work. People want to go on 4chan. >>5
Come in my board, there's no moderation at all. There's no posters either.
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-31 0:38
>>6
I was here first and want things how they were a year ago. You can go make your fascist CAPTCHA'd alternative and rot there.
>>5
Well, you aren't going to get no moderation here. So you can trust one us to provide a board with no moderation, or you can stay here and continue to fruitlessly complain. Or we can make it distributed, but that's another thread
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-31 0:44
>>4
Why complain about driver errors, when you can fix the source yourself?
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-31 0:48
>>7 4chan is shit. I'll go to your board. where is it?
>>8 the alternative need not be capchaed why would it. Things can be as they were, just on a domain we have control over.
Also, we'll need to import a snap shot of /prog/ to your board please.
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-31 0:51
>>11
I'd rather at least have a front page sprinkled with antisemitism and bullshit with a few programming threads than one filled with 18 threads of "what distro do u use?/" and all the interesting programming threads pushed to page 500 and filled with meme arrows. We used to have this. Why can't we now? Where did things go so wrong? Right, when the /q/ asshole took it upon himself to `fix' the board.
>>15
Spam in prog is any thread that isn't related to programming.
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-31 0:54
>>15
Those threads wont exist when they are sage bombed by other posters that don't want to read them. Self regulation worked for /prog/ for a number of years, and we can do it again.
>>17
But how can we sagebomb when there is a CAPTCHA? Are you going to break 1000 of them just to sink one thread?
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-31 0:57
>>18
Don't worry about em. Ey'll tag along with us when we all leave. And ey wont be annoying anymore when ey no longer has a power figure to appeal to.
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-31 0:58
>>20
I'm talking about an alternative /prog/. It can be anything we want it to be.
>>26
It's not the software, it's not even published. But with the domain name, the server IP and sufficient time, you could find my real name. I don't know if it's a big deal.
There's also the liability for hate speech and such (no moderation) but I have some kind of plan for that.
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-31 2:31
>>28
I think there should 2 options:
1. Real spam gets deleted.
2.Off-topic posts get moved into their own forum in Off-topic category(so content is never lost).
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-31 3:44
>>29
Get rid of the capchta and make the website less fancy.
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-31 3:49
>>32
Its built-in feature of proboards which is always on for guests and i disabled account registration(along with avatars). Should i enable registrations?
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-31 3:57
The only place on the internet where you don't have to enter a captcha for anonymous posting is shiichan(and some obscure outdated textboards) and its probably only a few days from becoming captcha enabled.
>>38
If they had a span problem they will add it. They're not popular enough.
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-31 4:31
>>25
I don't see the problem with importing the posts. As far as I understand, the posts are owned by the posters, not by the providers of the board. It's not like you see archivers for the image boards being sued for duplicating content off of 4chan.
>>41
Think in terms of shiichan's trap. Then add in tricks malware writers use to avoid detection by virus scanners.
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-31 4:49
>>41
MMMODeration, Autobans for certain words, temporary IP bans, text filters. Obviously captcha would only slow down automated spam, but manual and outsourced captcha filling will defeat it.
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-31 5:01
>>32
I removed anything remotely "fancy"(icons and stats/descriptions). Captcha for guests can't be removed as far as i know.
I can only hope.
It would be like a dream come true.
Hopefully they put a wordfilter on "syria" and "jew" too
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-31 6:21
>>52
But you wont have anyone else to talk to here if they do! It'll be done to people willing to fill out a captcha every time they submit a post to a text board, so no one!
>>49 If you are blaming the spammer for not doing what you wanted, then why didn't you do it yourself?
He kept saying he was going to do it, but didn't do it. If he hadn't said what he said or done what he didn't do, it would be fine: someone else would have done it. But he didn't.
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-31 13:11
my sync bot is syncing all the cool spam. Thank you spammer! Now my data base is filled with cute sjis art and interesting sections of articles.
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-31 13:15
<%RECAPTCHA%>
1 Name: Anonymous 2013-08-31 12:16
stop it you fucking jap
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-31 13:35
It's a false flag. Moot paid the spammer to spam the text boards, knowing it would give him an excuse to add captcha.
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-31 14:11
The textboards survived with no moderation for years. This is a bunch of bullshit aimed at turning /prog/ into /g/ without images. The mods hate our freedom.
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-31 14:16
>>57
Nothing was stopping you from collaborating, though. What part of /prog/ says you can only have one spammer at a time?
You have no right to complain, you could have helped but you didn't do shit.
>>57
I used Unicode spam because I didn't have enough time to gather articles on math and stuff. I'm using some extracts of some articles on set theory, infinity and category theory. Latex to BBCode + Unicode was too much work, so there's some raw Latex lingering out there.
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-31 14:57
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-31 15:43
>>64 I'm not being paid by anyone.
So you JIDF for free, brah? Why you so JIDF brah?