>>9
Personally, I'm a fan of Virgil. I unfortunately do not have the skills required to read Homer properly, but I can scrape through Latin authors given a dictionary and some time. Catullus and Horace are very much in vogue now, but I find both of them too crude and unpolished at times. I suspect I would prefer Virgil over Homer as well, since Homer's works were designed to be memorable and repeatable, while the Neoterics focused on applying as much skill as possible to each word and line of their poems.
To be pathologically on-topic (and hopefully not to cute), I think this translates well into programming languages. Authors such as my beloved Neoterics would write works corresponding to Assembly language programs, or perhaps APL and K, while modern ``artists'' would be web designers or UML users who don't bother to actually learning the mechanics of their trade, or at best Java and Python programmers, all performing operations in the same, cliched ways that are completely interchangable, always carefully protected from specialization without pages of boilerplate.