Haswell Jew Instructions

If Intel made good processors, they wouldn't need to keep adding all this crap. The number of new instructions is proof that Intel is hitting a wall and they know their ISA is a turd. Look at what these instructions are. Most of these ``advanced bit manipulation'' instructions were in RISCs for over a decade. Kikes slap their name on it and pretend they invented it. Unsigned long multiply without overwriting a source register? They call that an innovation? Pfft. They don't even have bitfield extract/insert when PDP-10 and VAX had them since before the 8086 was invented! Now that was real bit manipulation! Maybe when continuations and functional languages get popular they'll add a ``branch and link'' for making calls without using the stack. They'll advertise their 60's (or was it 50's) CPU instruction and come up with a catchy name for it like ``Advanced Functional Extensions''. They already did that with the NX bit. Nearly every CPU with virtual memory had execute permissions for decades except for Intel. They took a common feature, pretended it's something new, and called it the ``NX bit'' or ``Data Execution Prevention''. Intel is way behind the times, as usual. Intel virtualization is still inferior to the S/370 from 40 years ago. Their AVX is just catching up with where AltiVec was in the 90's Macs. The x86 is and always has been complete shit.
http://software.intel.com/en-us/blogs/2011/06/13/haswell-new-instruction-descriptions-now-available/

Why do you care about Intel? Are you some sort of CPU manufacturer who can provide a better solution to Intel CPUs?

Why do you care about /prog/? Are you some sort of imageredditor who can provide a better solution to le epic /g/ memes?

If x86 is so shit why does it deliver the most amount of gfloppers????????

All intel needs to add are mingle and interweave instructions!
>>2
Yes, not only can *I* design better cpu's than intel, so can every white suburban kid with a copy of minecraft and about 6 hours of free time.

>>5
what about black suburban kids, you racist?

>>6
They don't play minecraft.

>>5
So you're not a CPU manufacturer. You're just an Internet tough guy.

>>8
I'm curious what you do with your free time if you think cpu design is ``tough''.

>>9
CPU design doesn't mean creating toy CPU designs in VHDL. It incredibly expensive and hard.
You can't create a modern CPU in your garage.

>>9
I reverse microcode to help my community write free microcode. I'm not interested in the complexity of your CPU design, I'm interested in holding your CPU in my hand so that I can use it as part of my computer application. You can design chips all day long but it holds no benefit for me until I can hold the chip in my hand. Where is your competition to Intel's products?

I pound sand with my hammer until it becomes CPU.

>>12
Such is life in Moscow.

>>12 >>13
This made my day, thank you

>>14
Please optimize your quotes!

>>14
It's okay. You can thank him by going back to /g/.

>>15 This isn't optimal enough?

>>16 What gave me away?

>>12
How often does one appear?

>>17
Your unoptimized quotes.

To whomever is complain about making better CPUs than intel, and can prove it, we are waiting for you here:
http://opencores.net/