Anita Sarkeesian is a confirmed fraud

Vidya shitstorm of the century. It gets worse. Just thought it wise to give you the heads up, as this is about to go viral. Everyone who gave her money is going to know.

http://pastebin.com/sTBzSLJK
http://anongamer.tumblr.com/

"Johnathan McIntosh comes from a rich family, and is the scriptwriter for Anita's tropes bullshit. Basically, a white-guilt CIS male is actually pulling the strings behind the famous "feminist." It's a known fact that /v/ mods now cater to SJW bullshit, so look forward to these threads being derailed and deleted. This IS vidya, these people are affecting our hobby so they can earn money at our expense."

"Make no mistake, this is propaganda and they are very well networked with the retards in SRS."

We already knew she was a fraud bro.

Cool.
Guess it really was a scam after all

The backlash begins, dozens of threads like this now:

https://boards.4chan.org/v/res/207014892

I sure do love how Jew aware /v/ has become: https://boards.4chan.org/v/res/207001149

That pastebin is impressive. Quite a bit of work.

>>4-5
How about you go back to the links you posted.

who cares if she doesn't write her own tropes? the points she raises are valid

/prog/ - feminism

How is this programming?

>>10
Back to /r/programming.

...

stop fucking doing that

that's not proper grammar

>>12

Stop doing what?

Also, stop not capitalizing the first letter of the first word of the sentence, and not terminating your clauses with either a period or a semicolon; it's not proper grammar.

>>13
eat... shit... nigger... shitlord...

Why are /g/itlords confusing Anita Sarkeesian with Andrea Dworkin or some crazy separatist feminist? Hell, ey's pretty tame even by Tumblr SJW ``sexism is terrible, therefore kill all men'' standards. It's not like ey's out trying to pass a law to ban sexism or sexualization in your precious ``American entertainment''. If you're angry with eir reviews then you should also be angry with people who create detailed tables and reviews on scientific inaccuracies in movies.

>>15
Please stop this ``ey'' bullshit and check your non-privileged privilege.

I have a privilege and I'm offended by your lack of one.

>>16
English doesn't have a neutral pronoun, and I don't want to acknowledge people's gender (because I hate gender, and because it sometimes alienates them which is good because I hate people too).

>>17
"They" is widely used as a neutral pronoun. You could also be indirect about it and say "those people/persons". It does sound unnatural, but you think ey sounds natural?

Andrea and Anita are clearly woman names, and you should refer to them as such.

>>18
"They" is widely used as a neutral pronoun. You could also be indirect about it and say "those people/persons". It does sound unnatural, but you think ey sounds natural?
I read ``ey'' as ``they'', and the lack of ``th'' indicates to me that it is singular.

Andrea and Anita are clearly woman names, and you should refer to them as such.
Neutral pronouns are inclusive. That being said, I really do hate gender, and if someone is offended by my partial erasure of their precious gendered identity, ey can just go fuck emself.

>>19
They is perfectly fine as a singular form. (If you think that's ambiguous: do you also say ''ou'' instead of ''you'', for singular forms?)

>>20
That's just yet another deficiency of the English language. However that one doesn't bother me as much since it doesn't cram gender down my throat.

Really, try reading ``ey'' as ``they'' and see if it's slightly better.

sage dubz