/Prog/ challenge #4362

Make a HTML parser in regex.
Deadline: before the thread is deleted by the mods

>>77
Check your privilege, cisgender scum.

>>78
But then 50% of the web wont work, the page will say syntax error and that is that, 10% of the time. Which browser would you use, one that can recover from minor deformations or one that rejects the page entirely. Put aside purity. These dipshits created the page you need to access to take care of your shit.

>>81
But then 50% of the web wont work
Good fucking riddance.

>>82
These dipshits created the page you need to access to take care of your shit.

>>80
Thank you.

>>83
Who are you misquoting?

>>81
Believe me, if we used strict languages to describe data the and interfaces for representing it, we wouldn't have hipsters, shabbos goyim and Redditards trying to write pages. Instead, the people who actually know their shit would be the ones making the web.

But no, the solution for improving the web is keeping retards from failing, and encouraging to submit their halfassed work to the entire world. (Sorry, that doesn't make sense at all.)

>>85
He's misquoting >>80-san. >>80-san did say that.

>>83
You rely on CLOUD ENABLED WEB SERVICES for carrying out your daily activities? Poor misguided soul.

Before you ``call out on my retardation'', I host my own mail server and I use the Internet for this board and maybe Danbooru. I read my news on my trusty old printed newspaper, thank you very much.

>>86
And if we used strict languages to allow people to post on this board, it would be devoid of activity.

>>89
BBCode won't allow the slightest failure, though.

>>88
Some people are forced to use crappy websites a part of their job, or insert any other obligation here. And I would like to point out that this very page has malformed html in it. Look at the tag matching in >>1.

sorry, wrong thread. See https://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1284723267/1

>>91
I thought everyone here agreed on the shittiness of Shiichan, though. Now if Shii had done a proper job.

It HTML were as strict as C, this site would probably be free of imageredditors and it would have been born probably one or two months later than its original conceiving date. I fail to see what's the problem with that.

Just because everything is built with dog turds and toothpicks nowadays doesn't mean we couldn't have built the same things with better materials.

If you want strictness, use XHTML. You'll get a blank screen until it's completely rendered and nothing if there's an error, but that's what some people want.

>>94
Strictness is not the only problem with the web.

>>94
Depending on the parser.  The parser I use for XHTML gives a very informative message if there's an error.