Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-4041-

Shit/prog/Says

Name: ArchangelleNikita 2013-08-17 12:48

Have you recently read a /prog/ post that was bigoted, creepy, misogynistic, transphobic, racist, homophobic, or just reeking of unexamined, toxic privilege? Of course you have! Post it here.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-17 13:10

Have you recently read a /prog/ post that wasn't bigoted, creepy, misogynistic, transphobic, racist, homophobic, or just reeking of unexamined, toxic privilege? Of course you haven't. Never mind.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-17 13:19

Name: ArchangelleMentifex 2013-08-17 13:37

>>3
The actual racists in /prog/ are kind of pathetic, but that thread was the most idiotic thing I've seen since Nikita was banned.

Though Nikita was sort of endearing, in that lunatic hobo kind of way

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-17 13:41

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-17 13:43

>>3
Hey, my post is famous!

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-17 13:47

>>1,4
Does shit(re)posting count? For example, aside from Nikita, most of our racist content is just kopipe that finds its way here from other boards, and /prog/riders typically either ignore it or mock it (e.g. by changing key words).

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-17 14:01

Hi /sps/

( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) <<---- you are forced to fap to this

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-17 14:52

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-17 16:37

Some shitlord is necrobumping racist threads: dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1207316436

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-17 16:39

>>10
Your puny efforts will never match the persistence of a necro script. Consider your thread buried. muhahahhaha

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-17 16:42

>>11
Meh, I could write that same script to post the URLs here rather than to bump them, but I can't be assed to do that.

Anyway, enjoy your evening being ed/g/y on a textboard, I'm out.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-17 16:44

In fact, it'd be easier, I would only have to scan the first 18 entries in subject.txt every so often. I'm almost tempted... naw, screw it.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-17 18:58

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-17 18:59

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-17 19:01

>>12
wait are you taking this seriously?

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-17 19:39

>>16
It's all a game.

Name: ShitShit/prog/SaysSays 2013-08-17 22:09

Have you recently read a Shit/prog/Says post that was fag-enabling, niggerish, cuntish, tranny-positive, effeminate, libtard, or just reeking of unexamined, toxic faggotry? Of course you have! Post it here.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-17 22:18

Anyone who says "shitlord" is from SRS, and is likely either Jewish, a Feminazi, a Marxist, and/or a Transexual.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-17 22:26

>>19
Or they're pretending to be from there just to piss you off.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-17 22:44

>>20
It's just too easy. And deserved.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-17 23:09

>>18
>>19
Funny how Marxists are shown to have the highest IQs compared to libertarians and that nearly half or more of all nobel prize physics winners are Jewish with a capital J.

Deal with it shitlords.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-17 23:33

PRIVILEGE MY ANUS

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-18 0:09

>>22
Marxists are drunk on emotion and the false dogmas of their religion, and are blind to the errors of their ideology. Case in point, you always have to rework anyone who is against Marxism into your economic class warfare framework. Therefore, anyone who opposes Marxism is a capitalist/libertarian. Your assumption that we care about libertarians here is wrong. We are not libertarians.

We are wizards. And if you believe that wizards only exist in tales of fantasy, I suggest you tread very carefully.

And yes, I used the word ``religion'' above to describe Marxism, because that's what it is. A religion. There is no rational basis for elevating the ``economy'' as the end-all-be-all of human existence, requiring the sole focus of human civilization. There is no rational basis for egalitarianism and equality. I challenge you to give a rational basis for these that does not invoke circular logic.

The only rational basis for promoting such ideology is if you want to trick the masses into becoming slaves. Which is what your Marxists are actually doing.

Furthermore, Marx got it completely wrong. His metaphysics and conceptions of the material dialectic is divorced from actual reality; therefore, the rest of his theories are on a very loose foundation. You see, at the time, he road on the coat-tails of Darwin and materialistic evolution to give scientific credence to his theories on the economy and class-struggle.

However, modern science has transgressed beyond materialism, and has rediscovered the immaterial world. The material world as we perceive it is an illusion, reconstructed from our perceptions of the actual immaterial world of information and process. Do you believe I jest?

http://arxiv.org/abs/0704.0646
http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0001020
http://robotics.cs.tamu.edu/dshell/cs689/papers/anderson72more_is_different.pdf

It is this immaterial world that we wizards know how to control, through the magical and universal language of computation. We have no need for your capital or your revolution. We have the power of G-d.

Yes, this is what us real Jews and righteous Gentiles are capable of. You leftist Bolsheviks are wrong, and in time you will be punished by Ha-Shem for your transgressions. A curse be upon you all!

G-d has shown us his ways, and as a result we no longer need Gentile slaves and can therefore spare them from such a life. We have the power to create automatons, robots, and indeed new life itself through his words.

Finally, everyone here knows that the Nobel committee is all Jewish--it's not even fair. Although, I hope it stays that way.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-18 2:17

NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER /prog/ NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER /g/ is better NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-18 2:23

>>24

``rational basis' is a buzzword which means nothing you came up with, you aren't a genius like Gödel. You cannot claim to be truly rational.

There is no rational basis for egalitarianism and equality
there is no pragmatic reason to believe this, you will end up on the short end of the stick if convince the current world leaders of such thing
fascism will lead to brutal suffering for nearly everybody

Atheism is as well a religion using your definition. There are more rational choices to either theism or atheism anyways, you aren't capable of being aware of such things tough.

You are also strawmaning and generalizing marxism.

Science is overrated as well.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-18 4:51

>>26
You will be impaled when the Elders decide it's time to enforce The Law. Being born a Jew won't save you if you've strayed too far from G-d. You will be sacrificed.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-18 8:33

>>22-27
No, no, no, the whole premise is silly and it's very badly written. I'm the senior /prog/rider here and I haven't had a funny line yet. So I'm stopping this sketch.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-18 10:52

I know you're all trolling, but I'll reply anyway.

>>26
``rational basis'' is a buzzword which means nothing you came up with, you aren't a genius like Gödel. You cannot claim to be truly rational.
Ad hominem. But I suppose it's okay since it's clear ey hasn't done any research.

Atheism is as well a religion using your definition. There are more rational choices to either theism or atheism anyways, you aren't capable of being aware of such things tough.
And by that you mean agnosticism, correct? Since it's impossible to disprove the existence of something anyway.

You are also strawmaning and generalizing marxism.
You are also arguing on eir terms, using potentially ambiguous umbrella terms such as ``libertarian'' and ``marxism''. Social libertarianism and economic libertarianism have absolutely nothing to do with each other, and neither do cultural/social marxism and economic marxism. I disagree with economic libertarianism since it eventually leads to a fascist utopia dystopia utopia dystopia society thanks to the slow but steady accumulation of wealth and power, and I disagree with cultural/social marxism because of THE FORCED CENSORSHIP OF THOUGHTS, THREAD OVER. I also somewhat disagree with the statement ``humans are inherently good'' as well as with the statement ``the human race shouldn't go extinct in a slow and excruciatingly painful manner''.

Science is overrated as well.
Pray tell, what should it be downplayed in the favour of? Feelings? Hunches? Voodoo? Tradition?

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-18 21:44

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-18 21:47

>>30
I made that post (really this time) and I'm a FtM transgendered queer, so I you can't post that here.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-18 21:49

>>31
You turned into an abomination because some Jew told you to do that? Fucking faggot.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-18 21:51

>>31
If only you checked your privilege as well as you checked my doubles.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-18 21:52

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-18 21:53

>>34
Stop doing that, /g/ro.

>>33
Check this.
*whips out real dick*

Now what, kiddo?

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-18 21:54

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-18 21:55


34 Name: Anonymous 2013-08-18 21:52

    https://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1376758108/32

35 Name: Anonymous 2013-08-18 21:53

    >>34
    Stop doing that, /g/ro.

    >>33
    Check this.
    *whips out real dick*

    Now what, kiddo?

36 Name: Anonymous 2013-08-18 21:54

    https://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1376758108/35

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-18 21:55

>>32
I'm transjewish as well, and very offended by your post. Please take a moment out of your fervent shitposting to check your privelege and consider becoming transdead (that means (TRIGGER WARNING) kill yourself to a cis such as you).

>>35
*sticks the dick head in mouth while massaging the shaft with both hands*

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-18 21:55


34 Name: Anonymous 2013-08-18 21:52

    https://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1376758108/32

35 Name: Anonymous 2013-08-18 21:53

    >>34
    Stop doing that, /g/ro.

    >>33
    Check this.
    *whips out real dick*

    Now what, kiddo?

36 Name: Anonymous 2013-08-18 21:54

    https://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1376758108/35

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-18 21:55


34 Name: Anonymous 2013-08-18 21:52

    https://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1376758108/32

35 Name: Anonymous 2013-08-18 21:53

    >>34
    Stop doing that, /g/ro.

    >>33
    Check this.
    *whips out real dick*

    Now what, kiddo?

36 Name: Anonymous 2013-08-18 21:54

    https://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1376758108/35

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-18 21:56


34 Name: Anonymous 2013-08-18 21:52

    https://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1376758108/32

35 Name: Anonymous 2013-08-18 21:53

    >>34
    Stop doing that, /g/ro.

    >>33
    Check this.
    *whips out real dick*

    Now what, kiddo?

36 Name: Anonymous 2013-08-18 21:54

    https://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1376758108/35

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-18 21:57

>>38
I don't take people without tangible penises seriously.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-18 21:59

>>42
We'll see what the police have to say about it then.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-18 22:08

>>38
*STICKS THE DICK HEAD IN MOUTH WHILE MASSAGING THE SHAFT WITH MY ANUS*

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-18 22:33

>>43
What does the police have to do with your ``queer'' faggotry, shabbos goy? Will the police make me check my privilege? I already did, my penis is there and yours isn't. Want me to whip you with my big black privilege?

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-18 22:40

>>45
One day my people will rule yours and you will be punished for your impudence. If you apologize, start being nice to me, and check your privilege immediately, I might consider taking you as my personal servant, and allow you to have your ballgag loosened for a few hours each day, and only use a size 7 buttplug on you.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-18 22:45

>>46
I slowly move my hand up and down on my shaft. My semprini tightens as I moan with pleasure.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-19 11:27

>>46
I don't need buttplugs, because I'm not a faggot. I also don't live in a Jewish dominated country.

I hope you enjoy being a faggot.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-19 16:25

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-19 16:40

>>49
Sorry but that one is well-deserved.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-19 17:04

what the fuck, they deleted the "Getting rid of all niggers" thread, id 1321808549. good thing it's still available on the /prog/ search engine.

☺☺☺☺☺☺☺☺☺☺☹☻☹☺☺☺☺☺☺☺
☺☺☹☹☹☹☺☺☺☺☹☹☹☺☺☺☺☹☹☹
☺☺☹☻☻☹☺☺☺☺☺☺☺☺☺☺☺☹☻☹
☺☺☹☹☹☹☺☺☺☺☺☹☹☹☺☺☺☹☹☹
☺☺☺☺☺☺☺☺☺☺☺☹☻☹☺☺☺☺☺☺
☺☺☺☺☹☹☹☺☺☺☺☹☹☹☺☺☺☺☺☺
☺☺☺☺☹☻☹☹☺☺☺☺☺☺☺☹☹☹☺☺
☺☺☺☺☹☻☻☹☺☺☺☺☺☺☺☹☻☹☺☺
☺☺☺☺☹☹☹☹☺☺☺☺☺☺☺☹☻☹☺☺
☺☺☺☺☺☺☺☺☺☺☺☺☺☺☺☹☹☹☺☺

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-19 23:09

>>51
I have it too.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-19 23:53

>>51,52
This may surprise you, but I invented claiming that I have deleted threads.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-20 0:01

>>53
I'm not those guys but I too actually did save the thread and regularly save threads on the first page.

I've noticed the mod basically only deletes racist threads.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-20 21:00

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-20 21:11

>>54
The mod deletes threads that don't contribute to programming. Topics about race are irrelevant to programming.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-20 21:58

>>56
Back to any other programming forum on the face of the internet, ``please!''

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-20 22:02

>>56
But your wrong you know. Conway's game of thug life was invented in that thread, and if it remained a while longer someone may have posted a state transfer function. But now you will never know. I may one day create conway's game of thug life, but I'll never share it with you. Only with people that provide public keys who can prove they aren't you and after they sign an agreement to never disclose it to you.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-20 23:27

>>58
So start a thread dedicated to that idea. Don't start threads that are irrelevant to programming.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-21 0:51

>>59
I doubt the person that wrote the post containing conway's game of thug life was the same that posted the op, seeing as the op was posted, in wait. let me check.

2011-11-20 12:02

Interesting information will collect in threads with an off topic op. This law holds constant in all of /prog/'s history.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-21 6:18

>>60
If there's a programming idea in a spam thread, one should start a new thread with the new idea and let the old one go. Having good discussion does not excuse the posting of spam.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-21 23:58

>>61
Interesting ideas can and do form from topics that are not related to programming. In fact, just about every programming job out there involves creating a service that escapes the constrained topic of programming. It's improving anything in the real world that can be aided with a computer.

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List