>>83
The standard model, the major contenders for the Grand Unified Theory of Everything, nor fringe theories that are taken seriously claim that there is an infinite amount of matter. In fact, there is pretty conclusive evidence that matter is finite. No one ever said that it was infinite, only that numbers are, which are a priori and are not dependent on the natural universe to ``exist''.
Then why the theory itself rests on infinite foundation?
He write it for fun, or maybe to please God. Who knows what his motivations are.
Well, someone then could read biology tutorials for fun. And he can even do some controlled experiments, catching a few cats and feeding them various substance, including placebo. Just imagine Terry Davis doing chemistry!
Yes, you could. It has to be horribly simplified to the point that it probably won't accurately reproduce reality though. Suppose you want to simulate the interactions of particles in a 512*512*512 area. That's 134217728 units3. Huge amount of memory for such a small space. Now lets fancy what it would mean to be realistic: Wolfram|Alpha claims that a human cell is 2.25*10-15m3, while a hydrogen atom is 6.545*10-32m3, so you can fit 3.438*1016 hydrogen atoms (the smallest particle you need to simulate for a mostly-realistic model) into a cell.
Well, we are getting close to that. At least protein folding is no possible on home computers, so you can do a lot of exploration, without any lab equipment or dangerous substance. You can probably derive most of chemistry, directly from basic nuclear laws - i.e. determinate all properties of substance from its number of protons.
We just need a SICP-level tutorial to get people started.
No. Not now, not later, not ever. You're a cannibal who eats little girls when you don't get what you want. You've already declared your intent of building biological and chemical weapons for terroristic reasons. Why would anyone want to associate with you? I'm not going to end up in a secret prison being waterboarded because of you.
That is because society injured me. How can I take my revenge?
Maybe you should change your life goal to redefining math. I'm serious, it doesn't require going to college and making connections with professors who recommend you for research positions, and you can do it all from home. The math department is cheap and used to autistic faggots who can't maintain a conversation, because they don't need to bring in grants. You have a much better shot of getting a position through math skills than you do at anything else.
People, like Norman Wildberger, already working on more sensible science foundations. In fact, a lot of less known mathematician opposed Set Theory, since its inception.
Your mother really fucked you up.
That is because my mom is no scientist and her own education was limited to communist writing and history of CPSU, while her diploma work was something like "Tibetan Paintings". So she, as humanities person, thinks that education is redundant and a person knowing history of CPSU isnt much better than person ignorant of it.