Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

I came from /g/

Name: originalguru !iO2WczwrpU 2013-08-10 0:04

Hello, I came from /g/ and in this thread I want to expose my opinion about /prog/.
First of all: you are not as smart as you think you are, actually you are pretty pathetic. You may ask why this guy from /g/ says this? I say this because you really believe that LISP dialects are good for programming. Let me tell you something: LISP is just for BS n00bs students. Also this is the reason why the only computer book you know/mention is SICP, you probably left the university because maths were too difficult/boring for your fragile brains.
Second, world4ch memes are as dumb as imageboards "memes". You are not more special because you do jokes about jews, russians, and arabs or because you know some BBCODE+some unicode chars. Actually I think it's very funny how many of you waste your time learning how to "hack" text styles just to feel superior.
Third, all your knowledge about Touhou characters is embarrassing even for someone like my self (I watched anime when I was in the high-school). And also there is nothing funny about repeating LAIN a thousand times, seriously, even /b/tards seems smarter than you.
And the last thing: /r/programming is better than this shitty place full of elitist faggots like all you, and in my honest opinion Reddit is one of the more disgusting and stupid communities of the whole Internet.

I hope you could think about all this I said, but I know you can't because your brain is tiny. like the brain of a rat.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-10 14:54

>>38
That might make sense if /g/ existed before /prog/, and then /prog/ was created, linked from /g/, and populated by users of /g/ that were so elite the wanted to use a text based board with a smaller user base. But it isn't true. /prog/ has existed since 2004, has gone through a domain name change, and about a year ago it was linked from /g/. We now have a conflict of cultures, the one that existed when /prog/ was it's own thing, and now that it is perceived by some /g/ users as an off-shoot of /g/. I would prefer that you think of us as a group of old people clinging to a dying culture that is closer to usenet than 4chan. Although this isn't usenet.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-10 15:03

Second, world4ch memes are
OP is lying: no one from le imageboards says ``world4ch''
This bastard probably came from /DQN/, I can recognize some patterns on his terrible grammar style...

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-10 15:18

LAIN

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-10 16:35

>>1
SCIP is a good book. It's true that it's just for beginners and there's a lot after that. But that's not the only book I've personally read (in fact I've gone way beyond with The Art of Computer Programming and ACM and IEEE articles).
LISP is a really powerfull and nice programming language. But there are other awesome languages that are rearely mentioned here (languages like J or Smalltalk).

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-10 17:17

>>41
So what is this dying culture, Anon? Instead of programming, the most discussed subjects here are jews, niggers, nikita and bunch of political topics mixed with shitposting, tons of SPAM and ironic hatred towards /g/ as >>19. I don't believe /prog/ has any kind of culture, because there's nothing that suggest otherwise. The only one sentence - "Have you read your SICP today?" can't be classified as board culture. I'm being serious here anon, /prog/ just seems as shitposters and spammers den.
There's hardly any programming discussion around.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-10 17:19

>>45
Yes, nikita and the /g/shits have pretty much killed it off. Look back in time to 2007 - 2009.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-10 17:22

>>46
So it's dead, /prog/ must stop being hipsters and just come over to /g/. The times of text boards have passed, it's time to move on guys. Seriously.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-10 17:24

>>47
No it's still alive. We're just waiting for you all to leave before we come out again. Like an endangered species hiding in a suburban development if you will.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-10 17:28

>>48
You seriously believe /g/ has a secret mission to just come here 24/7 to shitpost and destroy /prog/ board? This is paranoia, the reason why /prog/ is dead is because /prog/riders are dead, /g/ isn't involved in this board being shit. Why would they wait? I'd seriously like to read some of those threads from endangered species. Why are they holding back? This is bullshit. Get on with the times Anon, there's no more /prog/, everybody's on /g/ now. Face it. Deal with it. It's over, it's too late, there's nothing you can now do about it.
I suggest you install gentoo and move on.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-10 17:29

>>47
I thought you said we had tiny rat-like brains?  Why would you want us to soil up your glorious /g/?

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-10 17:30

>>50
I'm not OP, I didn't say that.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-10 17:37

>>49
I would post on /g/ but there's too much immaturity for me. I know you'll retort about the immaturity here, but the kind here is well crafted and postmodern. The privacy threads are interesting, but I would be more comfortable with discussing those subjects from behind an anonymity network, just in case the tide ends up swinging the other way one day.

But if you want to read our stuff, then lurk here when you can for a while and then begin contributing. Come here not as a construction worker with a pavement roller, but as a unique creature living harmoniously in the ecosystem.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-10 18:16

>>49
Everyone but you. Now's your chance! Immanantize the eschaton! Go back to /g/ and fulfill your prophecy!

Name: >>53 2013-08-10 18:23

// _why-style BBCoed DSL
// see: https://github.com/whymirror/yown/blob/master/yown/builder.io

Sequence forward := method(
    "[" .. call message name .. "]" .. self .. "[/" .. call message name .. "]"
)

// "EXPERT" b i o u
// ==> [u][o][i][b]EXPERT[/b][/i][/o][/u]

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-10 19:10


    /,. -‐'⌒ ̄⌒ー-、 \    \
         /':.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:|.:.:.:.:.:.:.:\ ヽ: /_/
       /.:.:.:.:.:/:.:.:.:,:.:.:|:.:.:ヽ.:.:.:.:.:.', } /:.:.|
      l{:.:.:.:|:.l:.:.:.:/l/'ハ:、.:.:ヽ.:.:.:.:} .{::.:.:.:.:l
      ハ:.:.:.|:|:.// ノ ‐ヾ\_|l.:.:.:i }::.:.:.:.:.',
       ヽ:.:.{. ,:=、   ==、 ノ.;./ /::.::.::.:.:.:.',
        ヽゝ  、     ソ!※}::.::.::.::.:.:.
         { `ヽ、ヽフ /イ  /‐、_:.:.:.:.:.:.
  f^)^)^)^)^)^)^)^)^)^)「-、_,{※} r′ヽ:.:.:.:.
 r''⊇、THIS THREAD l|ヽ_/  } t′  ',:.:.:.
 { =='、   WILL   l|!;r'!※{ t′   ',:.:.:
 ハ,,_う  CONTINUE  l||;;l}.  {,コ      !:.
_{'V|l  AFTER THESE l||;;;{※.},コ      !、
ゞ |l   MESSAGES l|.l;;{  },コ      }
\,,|l    DESU~   l| L{.※{,コ      /|
  |l________l|,rn}  },コ\   / 〉


GB2/reddit/ and kill yourself
That is all "DE"#SU

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-10 20:00

>>55
archived

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-10 20:04

>>38
Yeah. Let's leave these hipsters rot themselves here while we have fun at /g/! Come with me, you'd better not stay behind. Promise me we will never come back here.

See you at the desktop thread.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-10 20:05

>>34
Nothing special happened. I guess they have some archives, but basically I replied a few times, they didn't seem to care much, and about two people used e/g/in memes unironically.

Thank you for the parser.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-10 20:09

>>45
So what is this dying culture, /g/-kun? Instead of technology, the most discussed subjects here are smartphones, rate my rig, desktop/battlestation threads and bunch of image macros mixed with shitposting, tons of SPAM and legitimate hatred towards /prog/ as >>1. I don't believe /g/ has any kind of culture, because there's nothing that suggest otherwise. The only one sentence - "Install Gentoo" can't be classified as board culture. I'm being serious here anon, /g/ just seems as shitposters and meme spewers den.
There's hardly any technology discussion around.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-10 20:10

>>46
Nikita has killed /prog/? What have you done for this board, other than bitching about Nikita?

He gave us Symta, ultrafinitism and a breakthrough in the field of biology (Jew parasite cell theory).

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-10 20:12

>>60
No I love Nikita. But his coming here did mark a shift in /prog/. Or maybe it died out a little and then he filled the void with his jew spam. I'm not sure.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-10 20:14

>>49
I suggest you install gentoo
goldberg@voile-library ~ % uname -a
Linux gentoo-desktop 3.9.8-gentoo #2 SMP Sat Jun 29 17:15:34 EST 2013 x86_64 AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 5600 AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux

Already did. Could you now stop spewing your stupid memes, please? If this board is so bad, why don't you leave forever? Or do you go constantly on Reddit telling people to get out there and come to your precious memeland, where all the text is green and your prose is heavily deformed by meaningless memes?

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-10 20:18

>>61
He came here like in 2010, which is coincidentally around the time ``/prog/ went to shit'' (it was always shit, of the good kind).

Then they put the link on /g/ and everything has been going downhill since then. No, don't say it has been worse before, because even the few /b/tards who came here were actually more tolerable and less LLLLLLLLEEEEEEEEEEELLLLL than the /g/reentarded shitstains.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-10 21:14

>>63
What's with crediting him with jewspam and ultrafinitism then? Those things were around for a long time before 2010.

/prog/ is not now at its worst. The hax-my/forced-indentation-of my anus shitposting was almost intolerable around 2008-2009. I'll take the frequent but not incessant tdavis-esque threads over that.

Worst, this ``le making fun of le reddit'' trend is more annoying than redditors actually are. /prog/ isn't the worst offender here (not anymore!) The parody has the same form and reads as authentic, now there's just more of it. Guess what they don't do on proggit? Talk like or make fun of stereotypical redditors. (That's not an endorsement.) We used to hate on reddit in more creative ways.

But yes, /b/ has more for /prog/ than /g/ does. /g/ is composed of people who fancy themselves experts for having a computer and lacking social skills. That ship sailed some time in the 80s.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-10 21:24

>>60

Did you know, if you accept finitism, you also accept that you have only primitive recursive functions. Thus denying the existence of more powerful computation constructs, like a turing machine?

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-10 21:41

>>65
PR goes a long way and Coq takes advantage of it. There is no halting problem in Coq, so any valid program is subject to machine analysis.

There are some real world problems that aren't amenable to this approach, but the field of CS has invented over half of them.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-10 22:02

>>66
nice dubs

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-10 22:22

>>57
You almost got me, but desktop threads are boring.

>>59
/g/ isn't perfect, I know, but at least the discussion is somehow related to technology (consumer electronics are technology), while /prog/ is more about politics ans shitposting than programming.

>>62
I just don't agree with the popular belief that everything what's shit about /prog/ is /g/'s fault. It's simply not true.
Also, the reddit issue. This fucking argument is used almost always when someone on /prog/ has different opinion from the rest. Hurr, you must be from reddit durr. I don't like reddit, I don't go there, just please stop refering to reddit whenever I post anything. Is this sime kind of complex, or what?
See this post here >>64, again, reddit and /g/ is to blame for everything.

I'm from /g/, I don't hate /prog/, I didn't come here to shitpost, but blaming /g/ for every fucking shitpost or SPAM that appear here is just stupid.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-10 22:29

>>64
Worst, this ``le making fun of le reddit''
Get with the times, grandpa. Now we hate on Hacker Jews and anything that has to do with ENTERPRISE and Web 2.0 Cloud Javascript Enabled Social Media.

Using Back to Reddit, ``please'' is just a generic insult and lately we haven't been really hating on Reddit lately.

It's mostly /g/ who came and shitted up the place with their memes and threads like this. Hell, I dare to say proggit users are cool nowadays, because their links are (and usually have been) programming related, even if they care a bit too much about Javashit. You're just retarded if you open the comments for pure pleasure.

You seem to think the HMA meme is something cringe worthy, but actually I reminisce of those times and I'd wish we could get them back, because I'm sure as hell these /g/tards aren't helping at all.

Also, look, the dubs guy is still here.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-10 22:29

Why don't you guys just move to /g/ already. Images are fun.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-10 22:37

>>68
the discussion is somehow related to technology
The discussion here is somehow related to programming, too. Check the front page instead of ranting about the lack of /g/reentext here.

In case you haven't figured out already, nobody is putting all the blame on /g/. Why would /g/ be responsible of the rampant antisemitism, the spam bots or the I FOUND A NEW EVIL threads? They're all our issues, and we know pretty well the causes of them.

What we're blaming you of is the fact you brought your ``culture'' here. Asking for programming help (I'm pretty sure you don't like tech support threads either), replying to legitimate threads with your interrupted /g/reen texts, spewing memes like a child from Reddit would do, complaining about the state of the board after you do the things I mentioned and stuff like that are what we don't want you to do.

As I said in >>69, telling someone to fuck off back to Reddit is just another way of saying "you're a retard, get out" that just stuck because there were legitimate proggit users that came here. It does not reflect the current situation of the board.

So please, we don't mind if you want to come here, but for fuck's sake, write proper prose and communicate like a proper human (that is, not stuffing your posts with e/g/in meme foam)

>>70
No.

Name: >>64 2013-08-10 22:43

>>68
I encourage you to reread >>64 carefully. It contradicts what you've said about it.

Despite your protests, your continued presence in /prog/ reveals your conceit... or deceit. You remind me of Dawkins, who gave up his life of doing useful science to harass Christians. Except he invented the mother of all memes, and you claim to come from the land of regurgitated memes.

/g/'s influence on /prog/ (which wasn't brought up in >>64, thank you very much) has never been good. Do you remember Woodscrews? /prog/ was as bad as /g/ at that time for the same reason. With 3-5 regulars (relax, two of them are in Sußman's head—Cain and Abel-san), it's easy to tell when /prog/ is suffering from transient external influence and it's usually just as easy to identify the origin.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-10 22:50

>>70
e/g/in post /g/ro ;) install le /g/entoo XDDDDDDDDD

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-10 22:52

>>69
All those things were made fun of before, but there are a lot of assholes aping stereotypical redditors when they shit on reddit. The form you bring up is not at issue.

HMA was a real problem at times. I don't know if you managed to understand any of the content threads that were completely derailed by HMA, but it ruined a lot of good, topical conversation. The predictable HMA responses here and there were fine, but there was a point when it wasn't funny or innocuous.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-10 22:52

>>73
That. Stop it.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-10 22:58

>>74
HMA never was funny, and it did ruin some perfectly good threads, yes. But at least it was an internal cause that sorted itself out.

I don't think the link to /prog/ in /g/ is going to go away any soon, though.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-10 22:59

>>75
I can't really blame lelcunt for doing his thing. It certainly isn't the right way to go about the /g/ issue, but it is a natural response.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-10 23:08

>>76-77
Sure, but I'm not blaming /g/ for everything. So I don't care if it was /g/'s fault or not. /prog/ is better without it, and the bit of /g/ we have now is not as bad as HMA was.

This ``lelcunt'' is more annoying than the people he's responding to.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-10 23:22

and the bit of /g/ we have now is not as bad as HMA was.
Sorry, I can't agree.

Yes, lelcunt is one hell of an annoying fuck, I hope he goes away, but I don't think he will until the /g/ shits leave.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-10 23:49

>>79
I've yet to see a good thread completely destroyed by /g/ since woodscrews. HMA was peaking at that time anyway, and /prog/ was near its worst.

If you think the infrequent appearance of someone from /g/ not quite fitting in and maybe being a shit by starting a thread like this one is worse than every topical conversation being shitspammed into nothing and being pushed to page 5 by a series of identical posts then I don't know what to say.

Things were better before HMA peaked than now. It's not worse now because we have a few /g/ folks here, it's worse now because we now have less quality /prog/lodytes. We put up with that frequent, low-snr tdavis stuff, I think we can put up with the amount of /g/ bullshit that shows up.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List