- manual memory management, but no malloc/free
- concurrent, parallel, no shared mutable state
- optional, user-defined GC
- bidirectional C ABI support
- single inheritance, traits
- strong typing, type erasure
- no safety compromises outside of unsafe blocks
- simd support
- arm support, android ndk support
- inline asm
- runtime optional
- inline closure definitions
Man up and deal with the fact that the language you want might not exist. Fuck, I've been waiting for Star ( http://fortune-mod-fvl.sourceforge.net/larry.wall.html ) to be implemented for years. Does that mean I spend my time bitching at other people for not telling me where it is?
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-05 3:27
>>4
It does exist. I'm trying to figure out who's aware of it.
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-05 3:29
>>5
Oh, so you're a Rust fanboy? The fuck off and go create something useful with it.
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-05 3:37
>>5
Rust is shit and will always be shit. But it might one day not be as shitty as it's common substitutes.
[#][rem] really does remove your posts Influenced by Alef, C#, C++, Camlp4, Common Lisp, Cyclone, Erlang, Haskell, Hermes, Limbo, Napier, Napier88, Newsqueak, NIL, Ruby, Sather, Standard ML
[/rem]
Go read scholarly textbooks and papers and figure out the ``rise of humans'' on your own. You cant trust what these people are saying or interpreting.
No idea what you are going on about either.
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-05 12:41
>>14
>implying you're not just backpedaling because you don't have a source
>implying I don't realize this
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-05 12:52
- manual memory management, but no malloc/free
Well what the fuck are you proposing then?
>>15
Is it that fucking hard to make a meaningful reply without retorting to Reddit level memes? You people bash so much on Reddit and their abuses of memes, yet your meme per post ratio is always greater than 1.
Why don't you fuck off back to your shitty /g/ once and for all?
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-05 12:55
>>16
>being this mad over my posts
>thinking your butthurt autismo posts will make me stop greening
>trying so hard to fit in with /prog/
>>25
That doesn't have the same power as malloc/free or gc. Also could you do us a favor and explicitly outline what you are trying to say? So we can explain why it's just a shitty reinvention of some shitty thing that is already ignored?
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-05 23:34
Oh that's Rust.
Name:
Anonymous2013-08-05 23:41
>>16
He's proposing that they keywords have COMPLETELY different names.