Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

Programming thread

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-23 20:52

Has anyone here worked with a repeating Boltzmann machine? Can anyone share how it programmatically works?

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-23 20:55

Repeating, I meant restricted.

Name: Taugenichts 2013-07-24 1:58

Was ist eine Boltzmann-Maschine?

Ich habe nicht mit so einer Maschine gearbeitet,
aber ich habe doch mit der deutschen KI gearbeitet.

http://ai.neocities.org/DeKi.txt

http://www.scn.org/~mentifex/DeKi.txt

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-24 6:17

>>3

Oh wow, this is really impressive, what kind of machine is this?

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-24 7:06

>>4
What exactly is impressive about it?
If you want to learn about RBMs then http://blog.echen.me/2011/07/18/introduction-to-restricted-boltzmann-machines/

Name: Boltzmann Contraption 2013-07-24 9:26

Weird News Headlines

- Layover's End: Russia Clears Snowden to...
- Meet Weiner's Latest Sexting Partner
- Proposed USPS Fix: End Door-to-Door...
- 3rd Hiker Dies Along Stunning, Deadly Ariz....
- NC Lawmakers OK Guns on Playgrounds, in...

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-24 10:27

>>5

It is extremely well made and it seems to work correctly at least the mindJS works quite good.

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-24 10:31

He will implement true AI.

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-24 10:53

>>4,6-7
Sure thing, Mentishit.

Name: ANDRU 2013-07-24 10:59

WHAT ARE AREU YES,¿¡¿=NO

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-24 11:29

>>7
Extremely well made?

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-24 11:48

>>1t

I think it is one of the most complete theories on AI and it even has an implementation. It does work quite well. It connects sentences of the form subject/verb/object.

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-24 12:12

ConnectToMyAnus()

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-24 13:04

>>12
I disagree.

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-24 13:53

>>14

You disagree with what? You can't disagree on the completeness properties of the Sensory input system theorems for example. Thus Mind.forth doesn't work well for you. What is wrong with it? I haven't used PHP so it can be difficult for you to comprehend, but I can port it to PHP albeit a bit cumbersome.

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-24 14:14

You can't disagree
Yes, I can.

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-24 18:15

>>15
You didn't even know what arrays were until I started insisting, Mentishit.

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-24 19:19

>>17
There's no way that someone could be (on some level) programming for twenty years and not know what an array is. Mentifex has seen past the need for bloated new-age bullshit paradigms like structured programming. Don't try to feed us MindForth hackers that fucking garbage, because we won't fucking have it.

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-24 19:32

>>18
Hi Mentifex!

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-24 20:16

>>18
There's no way that someone could be (on some level) programming for twenty years and not know what an array is.
Oh yeah?
http://www.scn.org/~mentifex/mindforth.txt
var b01 = ""; // for OutBuffer(); 4jan2012[o]



var b02 = "";  // for OutBuffer();  4jan2012

var b03 = "";  // for OutBuffer();  4jan2012

var b04 = "";  // for OutBuffer();  4jan2012

var b05 = "";  // for OutBuffer();  4jan2012

var b06 = "";  // for OutBuffer();  4jan2012

var b07 = "";  // for OutBuffer();  4jan2012

var b08 = "";  // for OutBuffer();  4jan2012

var b09 = "";  // for OutBuffer();  4jan2012

var b10 = "";  // for OutBuffer();  4jan2012

var b11 = "";  // for OutBuffer();  4jan2012

var b12 = "";  // for OutBuffer();  4jan2012

var b13 = "";  // for OutBuffer();  4jan2012

var b14 = "";  // for OutBuffer();  4jan2012

var b15 = "";  // for OutBuffer();  4jan2012

var b16 = "";  // for OutBuffer(); 26mar2013[/o]



Mentishit is so smart, he declared 16 variables instead of declaring an array of 16 characters. He also commented every single one of them with their date of creation! This is something an EXPERT PROGRAMMER would totally do!



^{^{In case you don't realize it, I'm being ironic and you're fucking retarded, Mentishit. ^{Having you here means /prog/ is something more than lllleeeeelll >e/g/in le memes, so it's not like I want you to leave or anything.}}}


                    
          
            
            Name:
                            Anonymous
                                        2013-07-24 20:25
                                                               
          
            
Don't try to feed us MindForth hackers

us MindForth hackers

HAHAHAHAHAHAH MENTISHIT HAHAHAHAHAHAHA OH L-RD
                      
        
                    
          
            
            Name:
                            Anonymous
                                        2013-07-24 20:56
                                                               
          
            
>>1

hmm, yes a little. I like them too =) nearly as simple as a clustering algorithm, but it's a neural net..



So, lets see now.. 

They use a nifty forward/back/forward training method, which means the network also works as an auto-encoder at each layer..



Training is (roughly) as follows..



L^0a * weights -> L^1a

L^1a * weights' -> L^0b

L^0b * weights -> L^1b



L^0a' * L^1a' -> w^{Delta +} 

L^0b' * L^1b' -> w^{Delta -}
                      
        
                    
          
            
            Name:
                            Anonymous
                                        2013-07-24 20:57
                                                               
          
            
if it's math, it's a pseudoscience.
                      
        
                    
          
            
            Name:
                            Anonymous
                                        2013-07-24 21:06
                                                               
          
            
>>22

LLLLLLLLLLLLUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUKKKKKKKKEEEEEEE
                      
        
                    
          
            
            Name:
                            Anonymous
                                        2013-07-24 21:10
                                                               
          
            
>>22

POST SOUNDCLOUD LINKS LE LUKE FACE

LLLLLLLLLLLUUUUUUUUUUUUKKKKKKKKKKKEEEEEEEEE PPPPPPPLLLEASE
                      
        
                    
          
            
            Name:
                            Anonymous
                                        2013-07-24 21:24
                                                               
          
            
>>20

Arrays are structured programming nonsense. It's much faster than having to disreference a pointer at the front of the array (much more expensive in Forth), then waste another instruction to add the offset, then adjust the resultant for the type size. It also leads to bad programming. By having every element represented by a unique symbol, the programmer is forced to confront the reality of what his or her code is actually doing instead of obfuscating it behind loops and numbers. You can always tell exactly how much memory is being used and where.
                      
        
                    
          
            
            Name:
                                                Anonymous
                                                            2013-07-24 23:14
                                                               
          
            
>>26

Miss SQL much⸮
                      
        
                    
          
            
            Name:
                                                Anonymous
                                                            2013-07-24 23:21
                                                               
          
            
>>26

Have you ever trolled so hard, that your sides suddenly detached on le reddit, ended up on an epic meme thread, and upboated the hell out of everything on /r/programming, Hacker Jews, /g/ and social justice Tumblrs? Yeah, I know you haven't, because that was a fucking pathetic try.
                      
        
                    
          
            
            Name:
                                                Anonymous
                                                            2013-07-25 1:04
                                                               
          
            
uhm..

and then you use sigmoid neuron activations, and i think setting the learning rate to 1 / No of training examples should help.. =)
                      
        
                    
          
            
            Name:
                                                Anonymous
                                                            2013-07-25 1:41
                                                               
          
            
this is a little hacky, but i thought of shifting the sigmoid 0.5 to the left... so S = ¹ / _{1 + e^^{-z - 0.5}}

Then the sigmoid kind of equalizes at value 0.5, which may or may not be useful =)
                      
        
    
    
            
        
            
                
	Don't change these.
	
	
	
	                
                
            
            
                
                    
                        Name:
                        
                        Email:
                        
                        
                        
                    
                    
                        
                        
                            
                        
                    
                    
                    Entire Thread
                    Thread List

Programming thread

1 Name: Anonymous 2013-07-23 20:52

2 Name: Anonymous 2013-07-23 20:55

3 Name: Taugenichts 2013-07-24 1:58

4 Name: Anonymous 2013-07-24 6:17

5 Name: Anonymous 2013-07-24 7:06

6 Name: Boltzmann Contraption 2013-07-24 9:26

7 Name: Anonymous 2013-07-24 10:27

8 Name: Anonymous 2013-07-24 10:31

9 Name: Anonymous 2013-07-24 10:53

10 Name: ANDRU 2013-07-24 10:59

11 Name: Anonymous 2013-07-24 11:29

12 Name: Anonymous 2013-07-24 11:48

13 Name: Anonymous 2013-07-24 12:12

14 Name: Anonymous 2013-07-24 13:04

15 Name: Anonymous 2013-07-24 13:53

16 Name: Anonymous 2013-07-24 14:14

17 Name: Anonymous 2013-07-24 18:15

18 Name: Anonymous 2013-07-24 19:19

19 Name: Anonymous 2013-07-24 19:32

20 Name: Anonymous 2013-07-24 20:16

21 Name: Anonymous 2013-07-24 20:25

22 Name: Anonymous 2013-07-24 20:56

23 Name: Anonymous 2013-07-24 20:57

24 Name: Anonymous 2013-07-24 21:06

25 Name: Anonymous 2013-07-24 21:10

26 Name: Anonymous 2013-07-24 21:24

27 Name: Anonymous 2013-07-24 23:14

28 Name: Anonymous 2013-07-24 23:21

29 Name: Anonymous 2013-07-25 1:04

30 Name: Anonymous 2013-07-25 1:41

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-23 20:52

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-23 20:55

Name: Taugenichts 2013-07-24 1:58

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-24 6:17

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-24 7:06

Name: Boltzmann Contraption 2013-07-24 9:26

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-24 10:27

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-24 10:31

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-24 10:53

Name: ANDRU 2013-07-24 10:59

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-24 11:29

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-24 11:48

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-24 12:12

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-24 13:04

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-24 13:53

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-24 14:14

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-24 18:15

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-24 19:19

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-24 19:32

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-24 20:16

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-24 20:25

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-24 20:56

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-24 20:57

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-24 21:06

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-24 21:10

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-24 21:24

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-24 23:14

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-24 23:21

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-25 1:04

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-25 1:41