Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

SICP Haskell Edition

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-16 10:20

When?

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-16 10:37

Now, so start writing.

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-16 14:39

Is it done yet?

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-16 14:53

in fact, von neumann's architecture can express any conceptions, so that OOP and FP is most publicized special case of pointers to functions

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-16 14:56

>>4
Back to /c/.

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-17 10:05

why would you want Haskell in SICP? It's hardly a programming language useful for anything. At least Scheme is a real tool language just that it isn't used as much as other languages

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-17 22:35

How about rewriting SICP or K&R in Symta?

Symta allows readable, almost pseudocode liek expressions:
I=0; do: say square of I is I^2, while I!+1 < 10; say 'done looping. bye!'

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-17 22:41

>>7
Symta also allows expressing the same idea in a number of ways, stressing the important parts by placing them first, liek one does in English language. For example, both "say it is even, when X even" and "when X even: say it is even" read as the same Lisp code ("when" (:|#:| ("X" "even")) ("say" "it" "is" "even"))

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-18 6:05

>>7
I've never heard of Symta. It's not even Googleable.

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-18 6:29

>>9
If you you are the neewbie, you might need to recap:
https://dis.4chan.org/prog/subject.txt

We also have SEEPLES.

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-18 7:24

check  'em dubz

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-18 7:27

It's not even Googleable.
This is a Good Thing™ as it has not been corrupted by the ever-reaching hand of the JEWS.

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-18 7:54

Nikita Sadkike's seal of approval

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-18 11:25

Shalom Hymie !

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-18 12:14

I guess they're still LAZILY EVALUATING the possibility.

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-18 12:30

>>15
epic lel !!!!!

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-18 13:52

They won't write SICP in Haskell because half of exercises will be auto-solved thanks to Haskell actually being a full-featured programming language.

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-18 17:17

SICP is a book for newbies.

Haskell is a huge and overly complex language, even post-graduate students struggle to learn.

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-19 6:57

Haskell is overengineered nonsense

Scala and Erlang make better functional languages

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-19 7:10

>>18
Don't you dare anger the expert programmer.

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-19 11:56

>>19
Fucking LEL'd at Scala not being overengineered.

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-20 0:57

>>21
It's the JVM that's overengineered, not Scala itself

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-20 1:58

>>22
Scala is just piece of shit.

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-20 3:10

>>22
But Scala doesn't fully run on anything but the JVM, therefore it should be thought of as intrinsically connected to the JVM.
Actually, Scala is just a Java lib. And Java = JVM.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-31 19:36


 In addition to the team aspect, Super Sentai also has a large emphasis on super robots and big scale setpiece battles. Ultraman has big scale fights too, but lacks mecha.

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-31 19:51

SICP = teach you the basics shit
if you want haskell to be just an educational language like scheme then do it
but I'd rather a book like real world haskell

Name: Anonymous 2013-08-31 21:06


What's the 'Right' way to tie the data and the parsing steps in a nice way? One could write a big function which does the right thing for the various data types. Or one could use a monad to keep track of what's been processed so far and have each processing step get whatever it needs next from the monad state. Or one could write largely separate programs and send messages around (I don't much like this option).

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List