Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

Best functionnal language?

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-15 18:03

I have a basic knowledge of how imperative languages work and I'd like to try out a functionnal language. I've heard they are actually slower than imperative languages.
Is that true? If it is, what advantages do those languages bring and what's the most relevant fp language right now?

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-15 18:05

in fact, von neumann's architecture can express any conceptions, so that OOP and FP is most publicized special case of pointers to functions

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-15 18:06

Symta. Because it allows you to write 123 + if A < B then B else A

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-15 18:09

>>3
Wouldn't that make Symta an imperative language?

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-15 18:16

in C programmer can write same "declaratively recursive with inference" shit but does not
becasue he have cycles conditional and variable which far better all FP shit

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-15 18:23

Which FP? There are "FP" with side effects (as in Scheme, for example), purely FP, total FP.

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-15 18:37

REAL Purely FP are the most useless shit because you can't get the result of processing your data because [b][i]MUH SIDE EFFECTS[/b][/i]

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-15 20:16

>>4
Nope. It just allows writing stuff liek:
  Scalar * matrix.| A B
                  | C D

Parsing into
("*" "Scalar" ("." "matrix" ("|" ("A" "B") ("C" "D"))))

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-15 20:19

>>7
Useless, until you enter grid computing.

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-16 4:12

>>3
yeah because that doesn't work in haskell

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-16 4:32

The only real, mature FPL today is Haskell.
It's useless to ask which one is best if there is only one.
The real question you should be asking yourself is: "How can Haskell be improved in the future in order to become the first good programming language in the history of humanity?"

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-16 4:59

>>5
>>2
Back to /c/, please. It's working again.

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-16 6:25

>>1
First use Scheme as a trainer's wheel for a while then Erlang and Haskell because they complement each other in their weaknesses. Other than these language's predecessors most of the rest are posers that just usurp everything without too much formal reasoning ("multi-paradigm" stuff).

These languages are slower, no doubt, and by learning it you'll recognize their utility anyway... or forever be like Cudder whom also vouches for PHP.

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-16 7:25

придумывают разные хачкели-хуйчкели, мондады-хуйячкили
а программы все также разрабатываются медленно дорого и получается таже хуйня
потомушто все далвют неправильна !!!
надо всех ненужных гуманитариев отправить в концлагеря на стройки века
а людаям с нормальными мозгами назначить 3 государственных жены
пройдет 23 года и проблема высокой стоимости разработки и низкого качества программ будет навсегда решена

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-16 7:30

Okay thanks

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-16 10:10

Or ATS, really. It combines both, imperative and functional.

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List