Schemeing in Haskell

Well, I guess this settles it. Anything Scheme can do, Haskell can do better. I think it's time to stop using a weenie language like Scheme and start programming like real men.

http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Write_Yourself_a_Scheme_in_48_Hours

Write Yourself a Scheme in 48 Hours

Most Haskell tutorials on the web seem to take a language-reference-manual approach to teaching. They show you the syntax of the language, a few language constructs, and then have you construct a few simple functions at the interactive prompt. The "hard stuff" of how to write a functioning, useful program is left to the end, or sometimes omitted entirely.

This tutorial takes a different tack. You'll start off with command-line arguments and parsing, and progress to writing a fully-functional Scheme interpreter that implements a good-sized subset of R5RS Scheme. Along the way, you'll learn Haskell's I/O, mutable state, dynamic typing, error handling, and parsing features. By the time you finish, you should be fairly fluent in both Haskell and Scheme.

There are two main audiences targeted by this tutorial:
People who already know Lisp or Scheme and want to learn Haskell
People who don't know any programming language, but have a strong quantitative background and are familiar with computers

>>40
And if C programmer doesnt know what he needs, then he shouldn't be writing the code in the first place.

>>39
You say fuck too much.

>>32
do you have some kind of problem with strcat? because if you have a problem with strcat, then you have a problem with me.

fucking fucking fuck fucking check fucking my fucking shit fucking fuck fuck fucking dubs you fucking fuck fucking fag fucking got.

>>44
told

HELP! I was using tor and got a child porn popup?
I was just using tor to look around the secret internet some (I've never been there before, do I downloaded tor and looked around some) and after a while a site poped up, and it was full of child porn. I looked around a little to make sure I knew what I was seeing, and now I'm really worried. Do you guys think I could get in any serious trouble? Could anyone even catch it because of tor?

>>46
Well, you were safe before, but now that you announced it here, moot is going to call his buddies in the FBI and they're going to lock you up and throw away the key for sure.

>>46
If you saw the picture, it was downloaded to your computer.

Answer the door. It's the cops.

>>47
Actually, no. A few pedos already got jail sentences for browsing TOR with pants off.
http://www.wcpo.com/dpp/news/region_northern_kentucky/burlington/Tor-network-at-heart-of-Northern-Kentucky-child-porn-case

>>49
99% sure they didn't catch them through technical means. probably just infiltrated the group as a sysadmin and added a little web bug to track them (because paedos are dumb). that's how I'd do it anyway.

>>46
first erase your browser cache and cookies and everything. if you're on linux, use "dd if=/dev/urandom of=/path/to/file bs=1M" to make a large file that takes up all the free space on the partition you have your browser data on. delete the file afterwards (obviously you fucking retard). also report the URL like a good citizen and stop clicking random ads like a spazing monkey.

>>50
paedos are dumb
Richard Goldberg was an aerospace engineer. Although I doubt Goldberg was a pedo himself. Just had a Geschäft selling CP.

>>46
How in the name of the specification is that even achievable?

>>50
Tell that to your Public officials, including education officials. The dumb ones are clergy types.

Also, the circumvention is easy, host the content over seas like in India. Kiddi porn is legal and taxed there. Great for the economy too.

Dumb politicians. The serious crime is the huge human trafficing industries right in the heart of the countries that ``ban′′ kiddi porn.

>>51
Still dumb