that's it, every touhou fan is a complete socially repressed pedophile who has a massive hard on for little girls dressed up like a preschooler bending over in suggestive positions
if I were the FBI i will keep a hard watch on all you fuckers
people who watch porn of people over 18?
people who watch videos of children being murdered, tortured, or beaten in non sexual ways?
people who advocate for a crack down of some sort on touhou fans?
Name:
Anonymous2013-07-14 2:12
>>5 people who watch videos of children being murdered, tortured, or beaten in non sexual ways?
I would in fact keep an eye on those kidn of people.
gorefags are really fucked but I think they are a bunch of sociopaths who are too chickenshit to act on their fantasies in real life and the gore actually may warn them of what may become of them if they dare act on their fantasises.
Name:
Anonymous2013-07-14 2:19
>>4
Yes, and I'm sure they do. But it is highly unlikely that they will ever do anything. To molest a kid, you have to have access to a kid, which requires making one (lel), or getting the parents to trust you (highly unlikely).
>>4
[citation needed] My 13 year old sister loves Touhou, and she thinks they are cooler than Sailor Moon.
>>6
LOL, but it none of the thing mentioned by >>5-kun are illegal. When those watching something mean you agree with it, and that you would love to make this happen in real life?
>>7
Indeed. But most rape cases are done by familiars, the people you know. So usually it takes lots of social engineering to accomplish such things.
>>10
oh fuck man please go into more detail about your sister and your life in general? any other brothers or sisters? how are her physical looks and personality and how she acts and such? man i feel so lonely being a only child with model-tier facial aesthetics
just a cute younger 10/10 sister to cuddle with and enjoy sexual mischief together and watch anime and program together naked
Name:
Anonymous2013-07-14 4:02
fuck i need a girl who is as sensitive as i am
but also with a fit body like me
of course i train only at home
train in bed if u know what i mean ;)
Name:
Anonymous2013-07-14 4:12
>>11
Lay off the /jp/ and anime for a while you delusional shithead. Little sister think you are uncool, hate you, and make fun of you in front of their friends.
Wanna chat together about our "affection"? We should meet online sometime... and share stuff.
Name:
Anonymous2013-07-14 14:57
xDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
Name:
Anonymous2013-07-14 15:47
the weirdest shit ever
the weirdest shit ever
the weirdest shit ever
Name:
Anonymous2013-07-14 17:10
>>14
you're ruining something beautiful you fuckin nigger
fuck
Name:
Anonymous2013-07-14 17:13
fuckin normalfags
seems these two may live in washington
i'll find 'em
Name:
Anonymous2013-07-14 17:19
rape
Name:
Anonymous2013-07-14 17:24
fuck a 13 year old sister? HOLY FUCK
Name:
Anonymous2013-07-14 17:41
>>1
Common Lisp is standard. It is ugly, but is fast and well supported. In most cases learning Common Lisp should be easier than learning Perl or C++. Plain C is definitely easier than Common Lisp.
Scheme is a myriad of half-assed implementations. Fun to play with, horrible to do any real work.
(if (and (brain-dead? your-compiler)
(nonexistent? '(for while do socket fork IPC etc etc etc))
(pulled-from-head? your-hair))
(lost-in-stupid-parentheses again)))
Name:
Anonymous2013-07-14 20:50
>>1
Many Common Lisps depend on the image system. I've heard these things sometimes end up as 50 meg executables even after tree shaking, if the feature is available at all. Most Schemes don't use the image system, they're usually either embeddable interpreters or command line compiler+repls. Most Scheme compilers usually compile through C to something fairly compact that still provides eval.
>>24
Most Schemes are interpreted, while those compiled through C/C++ still have interpreted eval, which is orders of magnitude slower than native code.
>>27
Oh, and how would you implement eval in a faster way?
Name:
Anonymous2013-07-15 3:29
>>28
JIT compilation. It needs the compiler inside the program.
Name:
Anonymous2013-07-15 3:40
>>29
It's debatable if that would result in faster code. The cost of compilation time at run time can be worse than interpretation, depending on the code within the eval. You can't do the JITing in another thread either, since you don't know what the code to JIT is until the eval expression is reached.
But maybe a scheme->c compiler could compile the code at run time if you give it a c-compiler library, so it could compile the expression within the eval to c, and then compile the c to a block of native code allocated on a page that is writable and executable, and then call it. Meh, scheme to native code is the best. My solution is to not support eval, as there is usually another way to do it that is more secure and gives better performance.
Name:
Anonymous2013-07-15 8:51
``Common Lisp'' removes cons, car, and cdr for no reason in particular except to be different. Really, do you want to be associated with these people? Do you want to be a space cadadr or not?
Name:
Anonymous2013-07-15 9:16
>>31 space cadadr
I'm stealing this. I hope you don't mind.