programming paradigms

1.What is is your paradigm of choice?
2.What do think is superior about it?
3.Have looked at other paradigms? What was your opinion?
4.Are there deficiencies in your paradigm that you are forced to solve?
5.What do you think about multi-paradigm programs?
6.Do you feel the need to invent a new paradigm or modify the one you use to achieve some goals?

paradigm of choice?

costanza ishiddygit face

>>1
You'll eventually learn that none of these questions have answers.

1. functionnal programming
2. better abstraction than oop and simple stack machine can handle it
3. metaprogramming (awesome but need meta-anphetamine to manage)
4. functionnal is slower and imply more return by value
5. best of all world .... c++
6. of course, learning a paradigm result in better coding practice even if you dont use the previously learned paradigm, so invent new paradigm should help.

suggest : esotheric programming language and anti-patern

>>4

imply more return by value
That's not quite correct, especially seeing how almost all functional languages I am aware of only support pass by reference. Saying functional is slower is true in the sense that functional programming is a restriction of imperative, ie there are data structures and algorithms that are imperative that have tighter asymptotic bounds than their pure functional alternatives. You can adopt functional style in an imperative language and enjoy those benefits, but the compiler will be more liberal in it's optimizations in a functional language, as it can make much more assumptions about your code.

>>1
1.Prolog.
2.Yes.
3.No. No.
4.No.
5.No.
6.No.

>>1
1.LISP
2.LISP
3.LISP
4.LISP
5.LISP
6.LISP

Read SICP.

>>5

you are right!