Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-4041-

Newfag about to read SICP

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-06 8:00

Should I learn LISP first, or learn LISP through SICP?

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-06 8:37

Lisp sucks. Read SICP and forget lisp like a bad dream. Start programming in real languages instead.

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-06 8:44

SICP sucks. Learn LISP and forget SICP like a bad dream. Start programming in the only real language that is LISP.

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-06 8:53

>>1
The latter, sort of. SICP teaches very little about Lisp, you would think that conses and linked lists are the only data structures available right up to chapter 5, when vectors are introduced to implement a VM. SICP is a general programming book, and it only expounds on Lisp as much as it's necessary to cover its materials.

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-06 9:08

>>3
Actually, there's no such PL as "LISP".

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-06 9:13

>>5
But there is Scheme.

Checkmate.

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-06 9:19

>>6
Scheme is a PL but not a real one, just a toy.

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-06 14:26

>>7
That's funny, a toy that's more powerful and better designed  than all the ``serious'' PLs.
Shalom, hymie!

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-06 14:28

>>8
Scheme
powerful
And pigs can fly.

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-06 14:29

Common Lisp is for real work. This is why it's the C++ of Lisps.

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-06 14:36

>>10
Well put. For skeptics who love Scheme and hate Common Lisp: the guy who co-invented Scheme did lots of work on Common Lisp, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guy_L._Steele,_Jr.

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-06 14:43

>>10
Any examples of "real work" done in CL? Real work where CL wasn't replaced by Python or something else, that is.

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-06 14:56

>>11
Guy Steele worked on a lot of shitty language since Scheme, including Java and Fortress. He's the original Anti-Cudder; The Anti-Car.

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-06 15:01

>>13
Some of the Java people also used to be unix folks. For example Gosling himself is mentioned in "The Unix Programming Environment" (Kernighan/Pike 1984) - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Gosling#Contributions

In this case I guess it would be Anti-"Unix way", i.e. Anti-"tools that kind of suck but that are kept simple so they don't suck too bad"

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-06 15:05

Are we going to answer OP's question or just argue about if the languages are powerful.

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-06 15:13

SICP is worth it. You also get a book about the syntactical details and features of the language you want to learn, if you want to use it professionally.

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-06 15:24

SICP is a starter book for people exploring Computer Science.
It doesn't teach programming per se, but some principles and algorithms.
It does have some value for students, but it instills some inefficient and inferior practices with dependence on Scheme, that makes you a bad programmer(especially if you program "by the book").
I would advice taking the SICP abstractions with a grain of salt, and think of the lower-level code these abstractions run on. Providing these abstractions only for reference to learn CS topics does nothing wrong but in the real world there are many alternatives and optimized versions, some of which must be handmade for the program at hand.

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-06 19:22

>>8
If Scheme was so good, can you name great piece of software (not necessarily SCALABLE ENTERPRISE APPS, as long as it is good usable software) written in Scheme? You can't. Because it's just a toy that no one uses anymore.

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-06 19:26

>>18
>great piece of software
LEL

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-06 19:27

>>18
Give me an example of a great piece of software first.

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-06 19:30

>>18
Scheme is the great piece of software.. ^^

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-06 19:35

>>20
UNIX

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-06 20:01

>>20
D°°M

Name: Anonymous (OP) 2013-07-07 6:03

>>17 About the first useful post here. Thanks.

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-07 6:18

>>24
Fuck off you uoy ffo kcuF

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-07 7:23

>>24
SICP has been deprecated a decade ago at MIT. It was a good book in the 80ies when computer where slow and had no graphic cards. The /prog/ spamming is just an elaborate troll for newbies. Don't fall for it.

I know I shouldn't tell him and just let him spend some months on an absolutely useless knowledge, but I'm getting tired of this joke.

Name: Anonymous (OP) 2013-07-07 7:33

>>26 Fuck. On /prog/ you never know who to believe. Thanks for help anyway.

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-07 7:45

>>26
I'm not sure if I understand your argument. Are you saying it isn't possible to do GPGPU computing using scheme?

>>27
Why would you believe anything you haven't experienced first hand?

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-07 8:30

>>28 Because I trust /prog/. Actually just because I'm a lazy fucktard who can't be bothered to read the book unless it's really worth it. I am learning LISP atm though.

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-07 8:33

Your message was perhaps one of the strangest pieces of /prog/ postings I have ever received. Although it is flattering to have a ``fan club'', in fact, it is a very bad idea. Unlike most of human society, science and engineering are based on the idea that each of us is capable of evaluating evidence and thinking on our own. Each of us can do experiments, work out the reasoning, and determine the truth for ourselves. There is no room in science or engineering for ``fans'' representing group approval over individual thought. One of my heros, Galileo, put it very well:

In questions of science, the authority of a thousand is not worth the humble reasoning of a single individual.

I am pleased to talk with people about matters of science or engineering, so you and your colleagues may certainly send me mail. I hope to learn as much from your experiences as you may learn for me. But please get rid of the ``cult of personality'' way of thinking. It is unscientific and ultimately destructive.

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-07 9:06

>>30 wut

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-07 10:49

>>30
It's fine having that reasoning when you study a single subject, but nobody has the time to apply such a thinking to every field in existence.
Humanity would be much better if the vox populi was interested in computer science, in physics, in the medical field etc.. and if everyone would decide not to confine their thoughts into a single field. That's not possible because of all the junktards who troll beyond common sense.

Basically, don't read SICP, and don't learn LISP unless you already have a comfortable amount of knowledge and have time to "waste" on brainf*cking.

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-07 11:47

>>31
You must be new here.

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-07 11:49

>>31
It's from a letter by le Sussman.

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-07 13:20

>>33,34 Copypasta?

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-07 13:26

>>35
see
>>34

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-07 14:13

>>36 yet another newfag here, who the fucks le Sussman?

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-07 14:14

>>37
Just leave. This isn't a good time. Come back in a week or so.

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-07 15:01

>>35,37
/prog/ has an esoteric culture that you'll need to stick around for 2 years to understand. Also *pasta is imageboardese, we call it kopipe (コピペ) here. I'm going to guess you guys came from /q/ from the posts made by the imageboarders looking for intervention. Sage your posts to show politeness if you stick around.

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-07 15:02

>>39
(コピペ)
Take your retarded japshit somewhere else, weeaboo.

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-07 15:10

>>40
No, you take your retarded self back to from where you came.

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-07 16:55

>>39
Go back to /jp/

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-07 17:14

>>42
I can't go back to a place I've never been to, so the statement itself is logically false. Also, only LEL guy, Nikita, Mentifex and perhaps a few others don't sage, why do you want to be like them?

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-07 17:57

>>43
Sure, they are idiots. But I don't want to be like the French moron!

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-07 18:59

>>44
Va te faire enculer espèce de connard

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-07 19:14

>LE FRENCH MORON FACE

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-07 19:23

>>46
kindly stab yourself to death, please

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-07 19:50

>>45
Le french moron is so FUNNY

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-07 19:58

>>48
LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE LE

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-07 23:45

>>48
He's not funny actually. He's a pompous douche.

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-08 4:35

>>50
fuck you dipshit

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-08 5:42

>>51
Shut the fuck up you stupid fucking babycocksucking faggot snail eating frog of a kike.

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-08 7:03

>>52
fuck off and die you racist sexist homophobic transphobic piece of shit

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-08 7:04

>>53
He's not racist because he's not a kike. Only kikes are racist.

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-08 7:17

>>54
Typical goyminist with their "power + prejudice" bullshit.

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-08 7:46

>>55
check your privilege, kyrikikearchal scum.

Name: Anonymous 2013-07-08 7:48

>>54-56
if this becomes a meme i'm going to track you down and fuck you in the ass

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List