Unicode Hebrew

http://s21.postimg.org/usjuq86vr/Screen_Shot_2013_06_29_at_4_30_03.png

yay! this filthy right-to-left languages serves well the parasites.

People this day, strappin that BlackHat wherever...

But what's the point? Most people have the file extension hidden, so if you build the executable with the default .jpg icon as its icon then people will automatically assume it's a picture.

>>3
But what's the point?
Worse is Better™

>>1
Sure it's good, but is it Lambda Arthur Calculus good?

>>4
Actually this is the exact opposite. Hiding file extensions and doing fancy text-rendering with filenames is a good example of Better is Worse.

Amusing how XP doesn't suffer from this problem:
http://www.h-online.com/security/news/item/Deceptive-file-names-under-Vista-733696.html

>>6
Hiding file extensions and doing fancy text-rendering with filenames is a good example of Better is Worse.
No. UTF8 and file extension are examples of Worse is Better and broken standards. Common Lisp from the beginning used 32-bit char-codes.

>>6
Amusing how XP doesn't suffer from this problem:
XP suffers from a lot of other problems. File Extension is one of them. Type of file should be described by its content and executables should be executed in sandbox, having no access to filesystem or anything global, besides what user explicitly provides them.

>>1
Type
Application
Well?