Question
Name:
Anonymous
2013-06-05 9:52
What are the three most beautiful integers?
Name:
Anonymous
2013-06-05 9:54
Primes.
Name:
Anonymous
2013-06-05 9:54
Name:
Anonymous
2013-06-05 10:03
I FUCKING LOVE JEWS
Name:
Anonymous
2013-06-05 10:07
1, 2, 7
Name:
Anonymous
2013-06-05 10:09
>>5
Are you a two year old? Out of all the integers, why would you pick such low ones?
Name:
Anonymous
2013-06-05 10:12
I LOVE FUCKING JEWS (and you should too)
Name:
Anonymous
2013-06-05 10:12
0 1 2
Name:
Anonymous
2013-06-05 10:13
-1, 0, 1
Name:
Anonymous
2013-06-05 11:39
0
1
2
With those you can represent any integer as sums.
Name:
Anonymous
2013-06-05 11:39
>>10
s/integer/positive integer plus zero/;
Name:
Anonymous
2013-06-05 12:20
Name:
Anonymous
2013-06-05 12:21
0, 1, 10
Name:
Anonymous
2013-06-05 12:22
>>10
s/positive integer plus zero/naturals/
Name:
Anonymous
2013-06-05 12:24
Name:
Anonymous
2013-06-05 12:24
Name:
Anonymous
2013-06-05 12:27
>>14
s/naturals/non-negative integer/
Name:
Anonymous
2013-06-05 12:31
>>17
s/non-negative integer/you just described the naturals in three
citation needed words instead of one/
Name:
Anonymous
2013-06-05 12:38
>>18
Whether 0 is a natural number is ambiguous.
Name:
Anonymous
2013-06-05 14:19
>>19
0 is a natural number because even animals and cavemen needed to count nothingness. Don't be a dick.
Name:
Anonymous
2013-06-05 14:21
>>20
Guess what. You'll be scrubbing toilets for the rest of your life.
Name:
Anonymous
2013-06-05 15:23
>>21
You'll be scrubbing midgets for the rest of your life you mental toilet.
Name:
Anonymous
2013-06-05 17:11
>>6
Yeah. I would've
AT LEAST gone for something like
0xdeadbeefcafebabe...
Name:
Anonymous
2013-06-05 18:52
I have always been fond of 139, because 1*3=3; 3*3=9; 13*3=39. Also it is prime.
248 is similar but non prime and therefore seems corrupted: a composite of lesser numbers.
Name:
Anonymous
2013-06-05 20:39
255, 65535, and 4294967295.
Name:
Anonymous
2013-06-06 7:07
3