Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-4041-

C# is Faster than Java on Linux now

Name: Anonymous 2013-05-23 20:04

Name: Anonymous 2013-05-23 20:06

lel javashit

Name: Anonymous 2013-05-23 20:23

lel shit#

Name: Anonymous 2013-05-23 20:23

>>1
Doesn't matter, RMS doesn't approve.

Name: Anonymous 2013-05-23 20:25

lel @ a hacked version of c# with almost no commercial support beating a multi-billion dollar backed java.

Name: Anonymous 2013-05-23 20:28

>>4

Mono has been open-source longer than openjdk. Stallmanite FAGS LOL

Name: Anonymous 2013-05-23 20:34

The problem is that both gtk and spring are shit anyway.

Name: Anonymous 2013-05-23 20:40

Even Mono is more secure than Javashit

Name: Anonymous 2013-05-23 20:41

mono
opensource
LOL

Name: Anonymous 2013-05-23 20:43

c# was made by microsoft to surpass java, just like the xbox one beat apple to steve faggots dream and has better tablets
sage

Name: Anonymous 2013-05-23 20:43

>>9

If mono isn't open-source, then what is it?

Your tin foil hat is too tight.

Name: Anonymous 2013-05-23 20:44

>>10

Apple still has i-shit. Two things are for sure. Oracle and Sony are f*cked.

Name: Anonymous 2013-05-23 20:47

>>10
What does xbox have to do with apple?

Name: Anonymous 2013-05-23 20:48

>>13

Xbox One beat Apple to the Apple TV product that they were supposed to release soon.

Name: Anonymous 2013-05-23 20:49

The current Apple TV is a joke.

Name: Anonymous 2013-05-23 20:54

Will the xbox one be able to play games too?

Name: Anonymous 2013-05-23 20:56

>>16

Yes, but these features are supposed to be coming out soon:

http://www.businessinsider.com/xbox-one-dvr-2013-5

Name: Anonymous 2013-05-23 21:04

>>17

Doesn't look like much yet

Name: Anonymous 2013-05-23 21:05

Why don't they just call it the xbox shalom to be true to their kosher roots and to directly reflect the jewish treasonous features it has
Or is it because no one would buy it? As it's shaping up it's looking like no one will want to buy it anyway

Name: Anonymous 2013-05-23 21:10

>>17
Woopdeefuckingdoo, I haven't had cable in years, just torrent the handful of shows that I watch.

Name: Anonymous 2013-05-23 21:17

Java is still a little better overall, but the margin has improved for mono on linux.


http://benchmarksgame.alioth.debian.org/u64q/benchmark.php?test=all&lang=java&lang2=csharp&data=u64q

Name: Anonymous 2013-05-23 21:25

>>9-20
What the fuck. You write like a child. Also, `sage' at the end of your post? Really?

Go back to /g/.

Name: Anonymous 2013-05-23 21:35

I thought /g/ was 4chan elite-tier?

Name: Anonymous 2013-05-23 21:44

>>23
That was as unfunny as a Reddit post.

Name: Anonymous 2013-05-24 1:46

That's just one benchmark.  If you want to cherry pick like that, there's still

http://benchmarksgame.alioth.debian.org/u64q/benchmark.php?test=all&lang=java&lang2=csharp&data=u64q

Which is frankly rather embarrassing for C# (changing machine types doesn't give C# an advantage).

Name: Cudder !MhMRSATORI!fR8duoqGZdD/iE5 2013-05-24 2:19

If you sort by efficiency you get a very different picture, although they're still far behind the leaders:


Lang   Env         Speed        Size    Efficiency
--------------------------------------------------------
Pascal  Free Pascal 34.73s       8KB  3600μHz/KB
C       gcc #4       9.09s     336KB   327μHz/KB
Fortran Intel       20.35s     260KB   189μHz/KB
C++     g++ #3      10.43s     620KB   155μHz/KB
...
Lisp    SBCL #2     37.56s   4,084KB     6.52μHz/KB
C#      Mono #3     23.09s  14,048KB     3.08μHz/KB
Java    7  #2       24.41s  13,996KB     2.93μHz/KB
...
Ruby    2.0 #2      26 min   4,884KB       131nHz/KB
...
Ruby    JRuby #2     9 min 585,428KB         3.16nHz/KB
C       CINT    20h 06 min   5,288KB         2.61nHz/KB


That Pascal one looks awfully suspicious... using less than 1/30th the memory of the second smallest.

Name: Anonymous 2013-05-24 2:55

>>26
I hope they are consistent when comparing compiled implementations to implementations that support interpretation.

Name: Anonymous 2013-05-24 9:23

>>26
Low memory use compared to other language implementations - because Free Pascal statically links programs by default, avoiding libc.
Confirmed.

n-body
Lang    Env            Time   VIRT   RES    1/(t×res)
---------------------------------------------------------------
Pascal  FreePascal  18.141s   384K    4K  13780µHz/KB
C       gcc #4       7.501s  7256K  424K    314µHz/KB

Seriously, IHNBT. How meaningful is ``Efficiency'' when you include 400K+ of library blobs (libc+libm)?

Name: Anonymous 2013-05-24 9:59

Pascal is great. I don't know why it hasn't replaced C yet

Name: Anonymous 2013-05-24 10:00

Name: Anonymous 2013-05-24 10:39

>>30
Some could be stated as advantages, like forcing parens in compound comparisons, evicting type casting and no static variables.
Other issues apply to C, like the need for declarations, weird syntax for some constructs and recompilation issues (>have you tried to make clean? >2013).

But as C is as little as possible, almost a macro assembler, there is not much to blame anyway. You have what you pay for.

Name: Anonymous 2013-05-24 10:47

>>31
>have you tried to make clean? >2013
LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEL E/G/IN >WIN >LE 2013 >LE /G/RO! XDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
>EGINGWINGIWGNIWGNWIGNWIGGONWIN /G/ROSKI! TRULY E/G/IN! LEL! XDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD

Name: jelly 2013-05-24 16:20

you guys are just all washed up oldfags obssessed with C/C++ or misguided newfags who think maekying vidya so kewl. get over your languages that no business that's smart uses.  You jelly of my six figure salary in C#(.NET) programming?

Name: Anonymous 2013-05-24 17:45

washed up oldfags
Ha, I haven't bathed in weeks.

Name: Anonymous 2013-05-24 18:26

obsessed with C++
No

You jelly
vidya
Oh, I see. You come from that place.

Ahem.

LLLLLLLLLLLLLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEELLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL E/G/IN WIN /G/RO, TRULY E/G/IN XDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD WHATAFUCK MAN UR MEMES ARE SO LE FUNNY I JUST SHAT MY LE PANTS AND I CAN'T STOP LAU/G/H HOLY SHIT XDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD LEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEL
>LE /G/ENTOO FACE!
>LE MUH MEME!
>LE 2013!
>LE IMPLYIN/G/ FUCKIN/G/ E/G/IN MEME LEEEEEEEEEL I LOVE REDDIT RE/G/G/IT XDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD LEEEEEEEEEL U LE JELLY OF MY LE /G/? LE JELLY OF LE /G/? LLLLLLLLLLLEEEEEEEEEEL XDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD

Name: Anonymous 2013-05-24 19:00

>>35
u mad ?

Name: Anonymous 2013-05-24 19:51

>>35
Back to 4chan, please.

Name: Anonymous 2013-05-25 5:39

>>44
oh my dubz

Name: Cudder !MhMRSATORI!fR8duoqGZdD/iE5 2013-05-25 7:30

>>28
Looks like something isn't quite right if just linking libc suddenly causes your program to balloon by a few hundred KB of non-shared data...

Name: Anonymous 2013-05-25 19:39

>>35
c++ or other outdated languages

Name: Anonymous 2013-05-25 19:54

>>40
I know, right! These people are such old farts :P
More amazing things like Javascript and other cloud technologies are the future of computing XD

I still don't know why I come here, these people are boring :P Maybe we should go and have more intellectual discussions at Reddit and Hacker News, as they don't cling on to the past. Let's go there, friend :)

Name: Anonymous 2013-05-25 20:49

>>41
I know ypu're trolling, but I will still bite. Both those places suck as much as this place, I'll go be EXPERT PROGRAMMER in real life

Name: Anonymous 2013-05-26 0:04

>>42
Wrong, they suck, wheras /prog/ is fucking amazing.
Will be even better when we can finally get rid of the dirty kikes.

Name: Anonymous 2013-05-26 2:51

get rid of my dirty dubs

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List